No Review list
- Thread starter Moderator
- Start date
- Status
lets not over-analyze this...shak said:
411 is for info, not reviews...
And lets keep in mind too that the DNR list referes to public reviews... being on a list isnt going to stop people from talking about sp's privately...
SWG
K,I've had a few brews but still have all my marbles,,whats the debate here?stryker said:I'm going to have a beer and celebrate on this one!!!!!!
I think all the reputable ladies who might have been on "said list", would be able to reiterate that to their clients as to not post a review and if he's a gentleman,those wishes would be followed ,,,,it is very easy to distinguish between a shill/bad/troll review
Good list of rules Dakota...
How about this one:
Sp's on the No Review list MAY NOT post in any of the review sections.
How about this one:
Sp's on the No Review list MAY NOT post in any of the review sections.
I think this is a fantastic idea and I'm glad to see the ' no review ' policy end... it makes no sense on a review board to think you are above it. That is why gentleman come to the board, they want to know their money is going to be spent accordlying.
Good - Bad - Indifferent We are after all on a review board.... not a lounge board full of hookers and johns !!
YIPPIE for coming back to the REAL reason these sites where created in the first place.
~ crosses fingers hoping we dont do the NRL~
Good - Bad - Indifferent We are after all on a review board.... not a lounge board full of hookers and johns !!
YIPPIE for coming back to the REAL reason these sites where created in the first place.
~ crosses fingers hoping we dont do the NRL~
huh? I posted not more than a week or two ago asking for a moderator or someone in the know to confirm the existance or non-existance of a no review list on this boardModerator said:
I dont know if swguy is a moderator or just a guy in the know but he told me that there IS a no review list on this board
which is it? yay or nay
As one of the lapdogs in question, allow me to explain....westwoody said:
Suppose you have a wife and kids, living a fairly normal existance. Your wife operates a small esthetics salon that provides a reasonable income and you're comfortable in the knowledge that she whiles away her days plucking eyebrows and popping blackheads for men and women who are too lazy to do it themselves. Oh yeah...she gives the odd back massage now and again but whatever. No worries...
Then one day, just for kicks, you google her telephone number...
... ... That's the kind of shit that destroys families. Is our need to know how good her HJ skills are so crucial that we would allow this to happen? This site gets close to 1 million hits per day! She has good reason to be scared shitless.
Now that she's aware of the existence of this board, she'll be asking her clients to keep their yaps shut. Until then, she feels like a sitting duck.
Her review was a positive one, that's not the issue. The issue is anonymity, something we consider sacred for the pooners. Should we not extend that courtesy to SP's who, for their own personal reasons, wish to remain anonymous?
Mod, at the very least, could you edit out the name and phone number from the thread?
Of course I would do that but you need to send the link to the thread or the name of it. I checked my pm's ( and I might have missed it but I do not see one from you)R&T Addict said:
This is not a rule that is going to cause any member or person harm!
Let me know and I will do what you ask.
M
IMHO, a no review list doesn't make any sense. If you put a product out there, can you tell "Consumer Reports" to not review it? If you are an employee, can you tell you employer that you don't want a performance review? If you are a movie producer, can you tell the critics to not review your movie? If you built a shitty car, can you stop it from being put on the "lemon" List? While I sympathize with the ladies' concern about privacy, however, it is a small price to pay for making $$+ an hour instead of working a regular job. And if your concern for privacy is so overwhelming, you can always get another job. By getting in the business you expose yourself to the public domain, now deal with it.
Another reason against a no review list is that some SPs, while a very small percentage, thrive on 1st time customers only. Why, because of false advertising, bait and switch, up selling, clock watching, that sort of thing. If you are an SP like that you would probably kill to be on the no review list which kind of defeats the purpose of a REVIEW board.
Now here is an interesting question for the mod. Let's say a member posted a gigantic warning about an SP in the neighborhood watch and it appears to be legit. But the SP in question is also on the no review list. You get a PM form the SP to take the thread down. Do you comply or let the thread stand?
Another reason against a no review list is that some SPs, while a very small percentage, thrive on 1st time customers only. Why, because of false advertising, bait and switch, up selling, clock watching, that sort of thing. If you are an SP like that you would probably kill to be on the no review list which kind of defeats the purpose of a REVIEW board.
Now here is an interesting question for the mod. Let's say a member posted a gigantic warning about an SP in the neighborhood watch and it appears to be legit. But the SP in question is also on the no review list. You get a PM form the SP to take the thread down. Do you comply or let the thread stand?
Only if the list is posted publicly. Otherwise, how would we know who's on and who's not?craiglist-lover said:
That's the problem on TERB. Everyone knows there'e a no-review list, but no one but the mods knows who's on it. It's a real pissoff to spend time composing a well-written review and posting it, only to have it yanked because of a NRP you didn't know about.
There should be NO list
OK - as far as googling someone's phone number. If you are ho'ing on the side or operate a R&T - here is a concept - get a different phone number and a P.O. box to have the bill sent to!
If you are so stupid as to leave a paper trail, you deserve to be busted.
A no review list is idiotic. As someone else said, if reviews get pulled, then why would anyone visit that person??
OK - as far as googling someone's phone number. If you are ho'ing on the side or operate a R&T - here is a concept - get a different phone number and a P.O. box to have the bill sent to!
If you are so stupid as to leave a paper trail, you deserve to be busted.
A no review list is idiotic. As someone else said, if reviews get pulled, then why would anyone visit that person??
the phone # is just one way to ID a sp in a review. There can be a number of various descriptions, ie place she operates from or her own personal description or IDIOTS who start mentioning personal info as in her kids or any other kind of personal info.Ilovethemall said:
FZ, as far as I know, has always respected SP's wishes to be on such a list if the reason is a good one and they understand that once on it , Everything gets pulled not just the negative stuff. In this thread, the Mod has not written anything in stone, he is simply stating he does not know of any such list. I imagine it's because he is having a hard time getting feed back from FZ.
Just my lil ole opinion
probably right
Stewie, you are probably right about FZ.....as far as descriptions go - there must be tons of women out there described as 5'8" with 36C 24 34 - so a description would not matter. The mods can and should yank any information relating to kids, marital status, even specifics on location.....all that should be gone. BUT the review of person X that has stinky butt and flabby boobs and gives really bad service, should be allowed to exist!
Stewie, you are probably right about FZ.....as far as descriptions go - there must be tons of women out there described as 5'8" with 36C 24 34 - so a description would not matter. The mods can and should yank any information relating to kids, marital status, even specifics on location.....all that should be gone. BUT the review of person X that has stinky butt and flabby boobs and gives really bad service, should be allowed to exist!
Absolutely agree with that! The other stuff in my post were just examples to what might and in some cases already has triggered someone being recognized.Ilovethemall said:
How cheap is a pay-as-you-phone?R&T Addict said:
If I'm paying a couple of hundred bucks I have every right to know whether I'm going to get anything for it, and if I get ripped off why shouldn't I complain? You think I should just let it slide so I don't "ruin her family". Save the guilt trip for someone else.
Screw the list...
Screw the damn list... lift a pint and be glad. Who cares about the list. who cares if list appears in the future. So with all the many members out there who haven't posted... or hardly at all, get your right hand off your mouse and your left hand off your dick, dust off your keyboard and start typing.
yeah.... reviews, that's what we're here for.
whooo hooo!
Screw the damn list... lift a pint and be glad. Who cares about the list. who cares if list appears in the future. So with all the many members out there who haven't posted... or hardly at all, get your right hand off your mouse and your left hand off your dick, dust off your keyboard and start typing.
yeah.... reviews, that's what we're here for.
whooo hooo!
pay as you go phones cheap? No not really. If you want to try and use one like a reg cell phone good luck. You'll be running into $100 per day and up.westwoody said:
Yes you should have every right to know if you are going to get ripped off or not. But for you to sit there and say "SCREW HER" she deserves no consideration what so ever is just not right IMHO. Discretion goes both ways. Although reviews can be done so that is respected and you still get the info you need. It's NOT rocket science.
Also if I recall correctly, when a "list" was posted. They had a grand wopping 4 or 5 girls on it.
Last edited:
I am a newbie and I joined PERB to participate in the Escort reviewing process. I can understand why some girls would rather not be reviewed. Some of the accusations against them seem unnecessarily callous. If a girl advertises publicly as an Escort than she's given up any right not to be reviewed. The right to do or not to do a review is that of the buyer.
Even though I've not posted a review, I would honor a girl's request not to do a review providing I received barely passing and not even satisfactory service. However, if I was ripped off or received intentionally poor service, I would feel compelled to post a review.
Even though I've not posted a review, I would honor a girl's request not to do a review providing I received barely passing and not even satisfactory service. However, if I was ripped off or received intentionally poor service, I would feel compelled to post a review.
Last edited:
- Status
