Sometimes the brutal truth is the best motivatorChip should should that he made the statement as a way of "motivating" these women to lose the weight so then they could wear his clothes?
Chip should should that he made the statement as a way of "motivating" these women to lose the weight so then they could wear his clothes?
If these quotes get less people to wear yoga pants in public, making downtown Vancouver seem less like an open air gym, I am totally for a boycotting of Lulu Lemon. It's time for adults to start dressing like adults.
If these quotes get less people to wear yoga pants in public, making downtown Vancouver seem less like an open air gym, I am totally for a boycotting of Lulu Lemon. It's time for adults to start dressing like adults.
would you still be livid if Lululemon shares hit $700?Idiotic Vancouver fashion trends aside, these are gym clothes. When women think of aspirational wear, wedding dresses, bikinis and pleather catsuits come to mind, not glorified sweatpants.
A maker of workout gear told plus-sized women that they were too fat for the clothes one is supposed to wear to the place where one gets not-fat.
If this is how he wants to comport himself, he never should have made an IPO. He has a legal obligation to his shareholders to maximise growth and profit. Making public statements which alienate the largest North American demographic (and growing), as well as simply not making products for them, is a really dumb idea.
If I were a larger lady, I would be annoyed, but if held Lulu stock, I would be outright livid.
Candy coating only prolongs denial
Sometimes the brutal truth is the best motivator
I think it's more in line with not having his cloths look bad. After all, there is nothing attractive about clothing stretched to the point that it's transparent. Also, Lululemon isn't sold as a "foundation" garment. (girdle)
Wandered by a Victoria's Secret store today......looks like not every women can wear that stuff either... I guess the owner hasn't said it a loud.
Peace
MG
Let me know what part of Japan you are in and I'll let you know where to go![]()
I've said this before here....and here I come again.Idiotic Vancouver fashion trends aside, these are gym clothes. When women think of aspirational wear, wedding dresses, bikinis and pleather catsuits come to mind, not glorified sweatpants.
A maker of workout gear told plus-sized women that they were too fat for the clothes one is supposed to wear to the place where one gets not-fat.
If this is how he wants to comport himself, he never should have made an IPO. He has a legal obligation to his shareholders to maximise growth and profit. Making public statements which alienate the largest North American demographic (and growing), as well as simply not making products for them, is a really dumb idea.
If I were a larger lady, I would be annoyed, but if held Lulu stock, I would be outright livid.
Exactly, Miss JJ!snip...It alarms me that an educated accomplished fully grown woman thinking it's ok to be so revealing in public it's weird and sad and kinda trailerish sorry but I'm in the gym on the daily they don't look good enough to wear outside for 99% of us over the age of 12.
yes, it works because her legs are visually proportionate to her body.Meanwhile, this works...!
![]()




