How to write a review: Suggestions

[take8easy]

I will keep this short. I think a review has to be informative.

In my opinion, every review should/must have; approximate location, easy/difficult to find, parking availability, a bit about the menu, incall quality, repeat/ recommend and donation.

Personally speaking, pornographic details of an encounter are boring and useless to me. I need to read whats useful to me.

Just my two cents.

 

[ddcanz]

I understand your point, but this Board is for entertainment also.
"Pornographic details" have their place on a number of levels.
But ultimately the review should provide a certain level of desired info.

 

[islander1-1]

Agreed... But I like to see a reason why. I dislike the comments I see so often here with "Avoid at all costs" or "Bad news" without a reason why. We all have different tastes. There may be something on the menu you like or want and the poster has it on his avoid list ie BBBJ.

 

[six1961xis]

How to write a review: Suggestions

Include phone number last 4 digits!!

Makes searching sooooo much easier
But then, who uses the search function??

 

[take8easy]

How to write a review: Suggestions

Include phone number last 4 digits!!

Makes searching sooooo much easier
But then, who uses the search function??

Oh yes, I forgot to mention that.

 

[take8easy]

I understand your point, but this Board is for entertainment also.
"Pornographic details" have their place on a number of levels.
But ultimately the review should provide a certain level of desired info.

I am glad we agree to a certain level on that point. I think a review should have as much information as possible without compromising decency and privacy.

ddcanz, you have been around for a while now. So I hope you agree that providing too many graphic detaills can be detrimental. Lines like, "she kissed me on my lips and we sucked on each others tongues like long lost teenage lovers", might set expectation level a bit too high for some. We all know things like bbbj and dfk etc can be ymmv. On the other hand adding simple comments like, "lfk, dfk is on the menu" makes more sense.

I dont think review should be done for 'entertainment purposes'. I guess we disagree on that point.

 

[felixthecat]

The key info in a review is: who you are talking about / how to find the ad, and whether you recommend her or not.
If only a name is provided and no other contact info, it's fine if she's a PERB advertiser. Last 4 digits of phone number (if any) should be enough for leolist ads, otherwise please tell where the ad is posted, we are allowed to post links too.

In my opinion, every review should/must have; approximate location, easy/difficult to find, parking availability, a bit about the menu, incall quality, repeat/ recommend and donation.

Most of that is optional too. Mentioning the city makes sense, more info might be useful if it's the first review of the girl, but for known SPs/agencies it's redundant. Parking is for those who are driving. Again, subsequent reviews may not need to duplicate the info.

A template is good for those who prefer to be organized and informative. But we should welcome people to contribute even if they don't want to fit into a template.

 

[jgg]

I'm just happy no one reviews me in the forums. I'm not sure what if anything, is said in the SP lounge, PMs or DMs on twitter about clients. Some may be embarrassed and probably wouldn't like it.

Some will say we should ask for the lady's consent and how graphic a review they are comfortable with. This is what I would generally do. This is an anonymous board so at the end of it let your conscience be your judge. If the experience is terrible, is it her or is it you?

It would be nice to have the ladies perspective on this.

 

[take8easy]

The key info in a review is: who you are talking about / how to find the ad, and whether you recommend her or not.
If only a name is provided and no other contact info, it's fine if she's a PERB advertiser. Last 4 digits of phone number (if any) should be enough for leolist ads, otherwise please tell where the ad is posted, we are allowed to post links too.



Most of that is optional too. Mentioning the city makes sense, more info might be useful if it's the first review of the girl, but for known SPs/agencies it's redundant. Parking is for those who are driving. Again, subsequent reviews may not need to duplicate the info.

A template is good for those who prefer to be organized and informative. But we should welcome people to contribute even if they don't want to fit into a template.

Everything is optional my friend. There are no rules for writing a review except "Do not compromise sp's privacy".


We do not have any template, and I am not talking about template at all felix, like I said, I am just trying to make certain suggestions. Feel free not to follow them.

Parking info is fully relevant for people who are driving and people do drive. I don't see any problem with mentioning a general area eg Newton, Gateway Skytrain, Guildford, Fleetwood or K.G. Skytrain instead of just saying Surrey.

I think mentioning donation is fully relevant. Many sps do not advertise their rates. I would rather have some idea of what to expect before making initial contact.

I got no problem with people who do not follow any of my suggestions, they are most welcome. A review is better than no review, that's how I feel.

 

[Ms Erica Phoenix]

I will keep this short. I think a review has to be informative.

In my opinion, every review should/must have; approximate location, easy/difficult to find, parking availability, a bit about the menu, incall quality, repeat/ recommend and donation.

Personally speaking, pornographic details of an encounter are boring and useless to me. I need to read whats useful to me.

Just my two cents.

I'd like to see this phrase disappear, to be replaced with 'available services'. Providers are neither steakhouses nor greasy spoons. it's dehumanizing.

 

[take8easy]

I'd like to see this phrase disappear, to be replaced with 'available services'. Providers are neither steakhouses nor greasy spoons. it's dehumanizing.

As much as I think "whats on the menu" is written as "for lack of a better phrase," I totally see your point Ms E.

 

[take8easy]

Re; graphic reviews

When I was an escort, I absolutely despised them!!!
Plus some pooners will automatically expect the same experience and it’ll get up some guys asses when they don’t get the same services. “Oh well I read in your review you did xyz!!!” :eyeroll:

So because a lady did whatever with so and so... some readers with miswired brains think it’s automatic consent for them to do the same...

My point exactly (below)

,. So I hope you agree that providing too many graphic detaills can be detrimental. Lines like, "she kissed me on my lips and we sucked on each others tongues like long lost teenage lovers", might set expectation level a bit too high for some. We all know things like bbbj and dfk etc can be ymmv. On the other hand adding simple comments like, "lfk, dfk is on the menu" makes more sense.

I dont think review should be done for 'entertainment purposes'. I guess we disagree on that point.

 

[badbadboy]

I will keep this short. I think a review has to be informative.

In my opinion, every review should/must have; approximate location, easy/difficult to find, parking availability, a bit about the menu, incall quality, repeat/ recommend and donation.

Personally speaking, pornographic details of an encounter are boring and useless to me. I need to read whats useful to me.

Just my two cents.

Good thread idea.

All the basics really need to be in any review: general geographic location are i.e. Yaletown, N or S Burnaby, Marine Drive, Richmond and the areas you mention in Surrey. The donation and contact info be it phone number, email or "Outlook" or "WCA" etc are the bare minimum. It's also good to know if the area is sketchy, poorly cleaned incall and if there is decent secure parking nearby.

Other than the porno details we agree and I'm not talking like "she ripped the sheets NINE times because of my superior Sex Techniques" as a former member used to boast. Some semblance of the porno details can be a relevant indication how much she gets into the session and not in a YMMV way at all. Like is she naturally very wet, did she actively promote a MSOG soon after the first shot, did she really get into it in a very physical way and was quite vocal about her needs/wants/what she enjoys? Did she jump in the shower with the reviewer? (my fav )

Otherwise without some descriptors about the session and I got caught in this trap a few times thinking it was gonna be great and it turned out to be quite a mechanical experience. Most likely from a few years of them doing certain things in a certain sequence at the 20 minute mark, 45 minute mark and the finish etc.

I'm more of a go with the flow kind of pooner who never goes in looking for a menu in a sequence. I prefer an SP who also who has that sort of flexibility and provides that sort of GFE type date. So if I read a well written review from the likes of Girth Brooks, BigDuke6 etc; I tend to also want to see the same ladies because they give a pretty accurate description of how the date may evolve.

 

[Ms Erica Phoenix]

I'm just happy no one reviews me in the forums. I'm not sure what if anything, is said in the SP lounge, PMs or DMs on twitter about clients. Some may be embarrassed and probably wouldn't like it.

Some will say we should ask for the lady's consent and how graphic a review they are comfortable with. This is what I would generally do. This is an anonymous board so at the end of it let your conscience be your judge. If the experience is terrible, is it her or is it you?

It would be nice to have the ladies perspective on this.

Generally, the clients that need to worry about being discussed in private by SPs DON'T worry about being discussed...they think they're God's gift. We share information about the Book & Bail guys, the Boundary Pushers, the Smelly Creeps, but the respectful sweethearts that brighten our days & make our nights fly by? Well I praise them to the skies on Twitter & to other providers who ask about references. I've never had a review on PERB that I was unhappy about or asked to be revised due to overly graphic content, but that might be because I kind of like reading & reliving the juicy details from someone else's perspective. I mean, I've written some pretty graphic descriptions here & in my old blogs, and I have mentioned some favourite clients in those blogs. I've had people tell me they are going to review me, & enjoyed reading those reviews. I have had other people review me without any idea who they were, & enjoyed them (though my curiosity burns me up!); I've had one or two less than stellar reviews that I've read & reflected upon & addressed.

 

[ddcanz]

Re “is it her or you”

One reviewer slammed an sp I know recently, I responded to him at the time but didn’t check his post history.

I noticed yet another highly critical review yesterday, I was then intrigued to see what else this fella had to say, then I noticed his entire posting history is virtually pages of bad reviews. Perhaps when so many failed dates occur one should step back and take a good, hard look at them self before booking another sp...

I’m looking at you, Wakka wakka.

It's been discussed before about reviewing member's posting history- I believe most recently in a thread regarding "fat fingers" when navigating the site on a phone and "accidently" bringing up member profiles. Instant record that a member's posts have potentially been looked over. One member referred to this behaviour as "stalking". Whatevs.
I say go for it.
I've reviewed dozens of profiles to get a sense of someone's perspectives- gives me a better idea of what I'm dealing with on here.

 

[FreeG]

^^ I agree - I see nothing 'stalking'-ish about looking at a member's past reviews to get a sense of what they like/how they act. One person's PSE is another person's prudish nun. Its especially useful when you've seen the same person as someone else and can compare their review to your experience.

To the original topic, I'd add: facilities (clean shower, scentless soap/shampoo available, clean towels), age/looks *approx.* as advertised (everyone has some leeway on how close to advertised one can be; I tend to expect a closer match for higher-end ladies or those with their own websites. I don't have very high expectations for those advertising on BP). I think what's most important to comment on is her attitude - easy-going? nervous? take-charge? timid? chatty (but not too chatty)?

Point of discussion: there was one woman I saw years ago that was deaf and her speech was difficult to understand (and of course, it was hard for her to understand me - my normal mumbling doesn't make for good lip reading, apparently!). Nothing in any review hinted at that, nor in her email, text or website. I PM'd someone (on a different site) for some opinions and he let me know as an "oh by the way". But I'm glad he did - I thought about cancelling then went thru with the appt and had an AWESOME time! She was gorgeous, unbelievable body, fantastic passion. If I hadn't known beforehand, it may have thrown me off when we met; since I knew, I just thought of it as meeting someone in a foreign country (where there's not much as much expectation to connect mentally if you both speak different languages). I've thought about it afterwards - should I include that type of information myself (I didn't review her as this particular site was pretty anal about details...)? Would that possibly hurt her business? Don't know the best answer on it, to be honest..

 

[ddcanz]

..... I kind of like reading & reliving the juicy details from someone else's perspective.....

Absolutely agree with this. As do many others I've communicated with.
Although relevant, just the basic facts can be somewhat boring- the review is then not a lot different than a WHMIS data sheet.
I'm looking to get a bit of insight into the SP- beyond the usual L/A/S etc- I'm not shopping for a can of low VOC paint that hopefully won't bring on a headache.
And if the play-by-play gets me excited then great.
For instance, describing how with said SP- after loudly cumming herself from lengthy and thorough DATY- enjoyed standing half dressed in full embrace, my hard cock pressed up her belly, groping and necking like teenagers until I blew under her halter top across the underside of her full, heavy jugs.
Sound like the kinda gal you might want to hook up with?
But I can separate the reality from the fantasy side and go in with open eyes. EVERYTHING is ultimately YMMV anyway.
Otherwise might as well buy a sex-bot.

 

[robotchicken]

I will definitely bookmark this page for reference when I make my first review.

 

[Mr Quim]

Although relevant, just the basic facts can be somewhat boring- the review is then not a lot different than a WHMIS data sheet.
I'm looking to get a bit of insight into the SP- beyond the usual L/A/S etc- I'm not shopping for a can of low VOC paint that hopefully won't bring on a headache.
And if the play-by-play gets me excited then great.

But I can separate the reality from the fantasy side and go in with open eyes. EVERYTHING is ultimately YMMV anyway.
Otherwise might as well buy a sex-bot.

Not sure if this is the type of Titilation, You're suggesting, might make for an interesting Review ?

But, it seems like a nice Example, with a little more than "Just the Facts Mam" ? LOL

Somebody asked for a Female perspective ?
This might satisfy that too ?

*Originally Posted by*Miss Hunter*

What can I say... I’m a pervert lol.

Speaking of pussies and sharing... I finally had a chance to play with a well reviewed new to the industry young spinner yesterday. And I can confirm other reviewers reports... Eve definitely has a tight pussy**Honestly, hers is the tiniest and tightest one I’ve seen and felt in my life. The session was fantastic. She was originally brought in as an assistant for an edging session to perform the bj duty, but it turned into a total PSE fest.

She is one hot little lady. Perfect spinner body, barely legal looks. Service wise she performed at a 10/10. She was extremely enthusiastic throughout the entire time. I’m a highly intuitive person and it was clear she was genuinely into it at a level I’ve only previously experienced when I did duos with Ms Erica.*

Due to her size restriction, I was very gentle and used my smallest strap on dildo (5inch length & 3.5inch circumference). Daty was yummy. She’s been going for laser sessions, that peach is smooth.

Repeat: Hell yes!! Already planning on it, just haven’t set an exact date yet.

The client was very happy and tipped us generously, I gave her the majority of it considering she worked much harder



https://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?242969-SP-s-who-are-moms&p=1824492&highlight=#post1824492

Cheers

P.S. If I could offer one Critique, it would be that Miss Hunter forgot to add the 4 Digits, for easy Searching ? LOL

 

[Ms Erica Phoenix]

Not sure if this is the type of Titilation, You're suggesting, might make for an interesting Review ?

But, it seems like a nice Example, with a little more than "Just the Facts Mam" ? LOL

Somebody asked for a Female perspective ?
This might satisfy that too ?

*Originally Posted by*Miss Hunter*

What can I say... I’m a pervert lol.

Speaking of pussies and sharing... I finally had a chance to play with a well reviewed new to the industry young spinner yesterday. And I can confirm other reviewers reports... Eve definitely has a tight pussy**Honestly, hers is the tiniest and tightest one I’ve seen and felt in my life. The session was fantastic. She was originally brought in as an assistant for an edging session to perform the bj duty, but it turned into a total PSE fest.

She is one hot little lady. Perfect spinner body, barely legal looks. Service wise she performed at a 10/10. She was extremely enthusiastic throughout the entire time. I’m a highly intuitive person and it was clear she was genuinely into it at a level I’ve only previously experienced when I did duos with Ms Erica.*
LOL

ahhh those were the days...