How Could You People

[Aeiyah]

I feel EXTREMELY exploited. Can't wait to be exploited again and again! Be back very soon, Sweetie! LOL

I need to hang my head in shame. I haven't been exploiting you, or any other SP's for that matter, very much as of late.

 

[Adriana✿]

I need to hang my head in shame. I haven't been exploiting you, or any other SP's for that matter, very much as of late.

Don't I know it! Get on that, Mooch!

 

[CLIT COMMANDER]

Audrey provides a full BBWFE (Ball Breaking Wife Experience). Menu varies from 7-year, 15-year and 35-year long options, with rates starting at half your house and 1/3rd of your pension plan all the way up to the removal of your balls, your freedom of movement, your sex drive and your masculinity. I don't recommend her.

In that case she could be my ex-wife posing under an alias! thanks for the heads up

 

[icemanmp1]

even god loves hookers.. and sp s......i think shes got a screw loose......

boring now... next topic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[hazbeen]

Audrey you were an old "bat" when you were on a "stripper" campaign havent changed much have you. Maybe you should try minding you own business. I feel left out you didnt comment on some of my reviews .

 

[Jessikaxxx]

my re-butt-al...

picture courtesy of Tabitha

xoxox,

jxxx

 

[Jessikaxxx]

"...These women are exploited and you are all guilty of it. ..."
-audrey j

hahahahaha...
too funny!

xo,
jxxx

 

[edmontonsubbie]

picture courtesy of Tabitha

xoxox,

jxxx

omg....too funny. I actually clicked on that link (i seldom do) and burst out laughing. Well done Miss X....how did you manage to write upside down/backwards like that? Please don't say you have some sort of assistant for such matters. Or...do...either way....wicked funny stuff and well done.

What say you to that Audrey?

kindest,

eddie.

edit note....oh crap...my guess is your assistant is/was Tabitha...duh. I just saw that.

 

[JessicaPrabbit]

Ha ..this is so funny, I typed a reply in the thread about the GFE/Hamburger comparison I started this morning and then immediately read through this thread. It is clear to me that my reply needs to appear here as well. Just before I get to that ...Trawler and Noddy tsk tsk tsk you wouldn't be exploiting anyone would you? LMAO. and BTBF ...you are certainly worth mentioning so I am dedicating this following message to Borntwobeefree ...W, you're my hero.
Ironically what follows was my heart felt thoughts typed honestly just within the past half hour and not in response to Audrey J in anyway. It speaks the truth that Audrey J does not and can not
understand.

..."I don't think nearly enough credit goes to clients overall. Clients who visit the ladies I know are FAR AND ABOVE AVERAGE BEING EXCEPTIONALLY RESPECTFUL PEOPLE who over and over impress me with the amount of consideration and respect brought into a studio with them. In 2 years I have had 3 negative experiences ...that is a remarkable average. Having worked other jobs I know full well the challenges that exist in the 'real world' working for a boss you've never met, a manager who seemingly hates you, working with customers, clients and coworkers who think they have the right to crap all over you if you make a simple error with anything. The 3 negative experiences I have had may have have been 3 a day in most retail, food, customer service positions ...
Why am I talking about this ...? I need to say it to all the clients because it has been on my mind for 2 years and since this thread has churned such respectful replies I want to say it now.

So for the record: Thanks to all clients, mine or others, for continuing to share a high level of respect with the 'working girls'. We all (clients and ladies) seem to be of a slightly higher moral standard than those who might judge us. It's so ironic.

If only the nay-sayers knew how much the girls take care of one another, support and truly bond, willing to do anything for each other ...If only they knew that no licensed lady has a criminal record of anykind ...that is huge don't you think? Any business you attend is likely to have a person or two with a criminal background, but not here, as much as there are people who would love to think this is a 'criminal world' you and I can all sleep well at night knowing that the clients and the ladies, in my humble opinion, offer one another a safe, friendly, relaxed and fun place to be. So, not only to the clients, but to all the ladies in the industry I want to say on the record that my experiences since beginning two years ago at the age of 41 have improved my quality of life and it is wonderful. Thank you."

Sincerely
Jessica P. Rabbit
www.jessicaprabbit.com

 

[HubbaHubba]

I can't believe this thread is still going

 

[mobile1]

Audrey J, you must considere that this is the only way for some of us here to even have the opportunity to have a GFE. I think you are assuming that every pooner here has the luxury of finding a SO in the normal way. Judge not, some pooners here have no other recourse.

 

[jim]

You guys responding to Audrey J do realize that this poster was banned the day of the original post right?

 

[JessicaPrabbit]

I knew she had been banned, can't speak for the others, none-the-less it appears to be a hot topic and people are getting things off their chest. Seems like good medicine at any rate.

BunnyHugs
Jessica
www.jessicaprabbit.com

 

[Bad Santa]

You guys responding to Audrey J do realize that this poster was banned the day of the original post right?

And that was on April 1.

I guess April isn't over yet, but honestly, I thought "April Fools" only lasted one day.

 

[Man Mountain]

Not all sex workers are victims

Sorry to bump this thread again but I saw the following posted on another forum and thought this thread was the most appropriate place to post it on this forum. I thought it was an interesting and insightful read.

Source - http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/14/sex-workers-victims-laws-prostitution

Not all sex workers are victims
New laws on prostitution are sexist – being paid for sex does not objectify me any more than working in a low wage job did

Thierry Schaffauser
guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 14 April 2010 11.22 BST
Article history

On the 1 April 2010, the Policing and Crime Act became effective. We are facing not a feminist measure, but an ideology that sees women as unable to be sexually independent and free of their own actions. Anti-sex-worker laws are sexist. They are essentialist, paternalist and reinforce the division of women.

It is an essentialist conception to consider sex work as always a violence whatever the period, the place, or the conditions. Sex workers are often seen only as women when many men and transsexual people are also working, and women are always seen as victims by essence. All acts of violence against a sex worker are thus analysed as intrinsically the result of sex work itself and not the conditions in which sex work is exercised.

It stops the real violence that exists in the sex industry being visible. We are told that we must stop sex work to avoid this violence. If we refuse, we become accomplices of the patriarchal system. We are accused of being responsible for maintaining an industry that harms women.

Yet bell hooks warned feminists of the dangers of a "shared victimisation" sisterhood. A victim's status for women reduce them to beings who must be protected. It participates in the denial of their capacities. It denies sex workers the free disposal of our bodies, our self-determination, our capacity to express our sexual consent like children under 16. It reinforces the idea that sex workers are too stupid, lazy, without any skills, and without consciousness of their alienation.

Many anti-sex-workers' rights activists think that rape is the conditioning to becoming a sex worker. These claims about rape in our childhood or Stockholm syndrome are used to de-legitimate political attempts to be recognised as experts on our lives and to confiscate our voice. How could we say that a victim of rape has lost her capacity to express her consent because she is traumatised for life? We never say that for other people.

Another paternalistic way to deny our voice is to claim that we are manipulated by pimps. It is a common accusation since the beginning of our movement in 1975. This strategy has been used against many groups. For instance women were accused of being manipulated by the church to be deprived their right to vote.

Instead of fighting the "whore stigma", middle-class feminists prefer to distance themselves from it, and by doing so reinforce it and exclude those who incarnate this identity. This participates in the segregation between women. This may be a form of internalised sexism by other women who think female sex workers give them a bad name. According to some anti-sex-workers' rights activists, sex workers maintain the idea that men can own women's bodies. Sex workers are told that they create a sexual pressure on the whole women class.

On the contrary, I think that it is by using expressions such as "selling your body" that we reinforce the idea of sex workers being owned and women as objects, while sex workers try to impose the term the "sale of sexual services" between two adult subjects. How can we talk about the ownership of our bodies when we are on the contrary those who impose their conditions? Isn't it an excuse not to question their own sexuality?

Being penetrated doesn't mean that I give my body. Being paid for sex doesn't make me more of an object than when I was working for the minimum wage. What makes me an object is political discourses that silence me, criminalise my sexual partners against my will, refuse me equal rights as a worker and citizen, and refuse to acknowledge my self-determination and the words I use to describe myself.

 

[ThisEndUp]

Sorry to bump this thread again but I saw the following posted on another forum and thought this thread was the most appropriate place to post it on this forum. I thought it was an interesting and insightful read.

/QUOTE]

But the Salvation Army says they are to

 

[DQ Guy]

Shoot
I didn't even make the List...

Jeeze, whats wrong with you people