Arguing that refunding a victim opens the door to scammers is a fallacious deflection. The issue here isn’t about hypothetical fraud but about the agency’s verifiable poor practices and failure to deliver a legitimate service. The quick firing of the worker after the public complaint implicitly acknowledges wrongdoing. This isn’t about 'false claims’ or ‘scammers on both sides’ it’s about basic accountability. Expecting the agency to refund the customer is not generosity... that is the bare minimum when they admit fault.There’s always someone who will exploit any situation.
Bazzinga You nailed it brother!points made for and against, but as the saying goes play stupid games win stupid prize. It’s a high risk activity for many reasons at the best of times. Do you really think all these women love what they do? Imagine opening the door to a stranger and letting them have their way for a couple hundred bucks. Most of these agencies are just modern day trafficking. Some will be good, some won’t and that’s always going to be the case. What if she just had a horrible experience? Same goes for the guys, many on here are probably really good dudes, but let’s face it probably half the guys out there are pieces of shit. I’d bet every one of these women have some terrible tales. So yeah, a refund to a stranger just because they claim a bad experience is never gonna happen nor should it. If everyone was genuine and caring then sure, but that’s not the case now more than ever.
Hrmm.. Giving a refund for shit behaviour may invite abuse.. and yet, zero consequences may incentivize further shit behaviour.points made for and against, but as the saying goes play stupid games win stupid prize. It’s a high risk activity for many reasons at the best of times. Do you really think all these women love what they do? Imagine opening the door to a stranger and letting them have their way for a couple hundred bucks. Most of these agencies are just modern day trafficking. Some will be good, some won’t and that’s always going to be the case. What if she just had a horrible experience? Same goes for the guys, many on here are probably really good dudes, but let’s face it probably half the guys out there are pieces of shit. I’d bet every one of these women have some terrible tales. So yeah, a refund to a stranger just because they claim a bad experience is never gonna happen nor should it. If everyone was genuine and caring then sure, but that’s not the case now more than ever.
And that's why it's not up to the public to decide. I've known people who buy things, almost instantly break them because they don't know what they are doing, and then attempt to return it. Cell phones being returned with water damage, for instance. Each individual case needs to be assessed. A blanket statement of accepting all returns isn't a good policy. Besides, comparing products to services isn't and one-to-one.Arguing that refunding a victim opens the door to scammers is a fallacious deflection. The issue here isn’t about hypothetical fraud but about the agency’s verifiable poor practices and failure to deliver a legitimate service. The quick firing of the worker after the public complaint implicitly acknowledges wrongdoing. This isn’t about 'false claims’ or ‘scammers on both sides’ it’s about basic accountability. Expecting the agency to refund the customer is not generosity... that is the bare minimum when they admit fault.
It’s like if a restaurant serves numerous customers raw steak, and finally one customer complains publically. Instead of addressing the issue, someone responds with, ‘Well, customers might lie, and this could open the door to scammers claiming the food was undercooked.’ That’s a deflection from the actual issue.
I bet you would get right back in your car and whip over to Costco demanding a refund or replacement if you unboxed your el-cheapo TV set only to find it apparently isn't working as promised.
I dont think it should be like vip i had tried numerous times to get into vip..They even went as far to tell me they would call me back which never happened.An agency needs to filter clients and maintain a list like VIP. It's mind boggling they would let girls take whoever is booking. Only then you can have good SP work for you.
I still see her ads on leolistSorry to hear that we are come to kick her out right away.
I'm able to keep my expectations in check when I mentally categorize this agency as being more like a roadside brothel. Somehow it all makes more sense that way.An agency needs to filter clients and maintain a list like VIP. It's mind boggling they would let girls take whoever is booking. Only then you can have good SP work for you.
I've never been interested in VIPOTG, but the majority of the worst reviews I've come across here are about misleading Asian service providers. It’s hard to believe that anyone is missing out on much of an experience unless they've been living under a rock. I even think that the ones claiming to have won the "Best Service Provider of the Year" award must be a joke or for people who don't know any better.This agency a big scam, they still advertise for Gigi, and what I discovered they recruit some of girls was working in flaw massage and allocate them in south , worst service ever,
It’s partially a local thing. Most asian ads may not show the real pic for various reasons. But in larger markets there are many agencies that offer good/great experiences 95% of the time.I've never been interested in VIPOTG, but the majority of the worst reviews I've come across here are about misleading Asian service providers. It’s hard to believe that anyone is missing out on much of an experience unless they've been living under a rock. I even think that the ones claiming to have won the "Best Service Provider of the Year" award must be a joke or for people who don't know any better.






