Gigi 0598
- Thread starter Maddyloveskanax
- Start date
Arguing that refunding a victim opens the door to scammers is a fallacious deflection. The issue here isn’t about hypothetical fraud but about the agency’s verifiable poor practices and failure to deliver a legitimate service. The quick firing of the worker after the public complaint implicitly acknowledges wrongdoing. This isn’t about 'false claims’ or ‘scammers on both sides’ it’s about basic accountability. Expecting the agency to refund the customer is not generosity... that is the bare minimum when they admit fault.
It’s like if a restaurant serves numerous customers raw steak, and finally one customer complains publically. Instead of addressing the issue, someone responds with, ‘Well, customers might lie, and this could open the door to scammers claiming the food was undercooked.’ That’s a deflection from the actual issue.
I bet you would get right back in your car and whip over to Costco demanding a refund or replacement if you unboxed your el-cheapo TV set only to find it apparently isn't working as promised.
points made for and against, but as the saying goes play stupid games win stupid prize. It’s a high risk activity for many reasons at the best of times. Do you really think all these women love what they do? Imagine opening the door to a stranger and letting them have their way for a couple hundred bucks. Most of these agencies are just modern day trafficking. Some will be good, some won’t and that’s always going to be the case. What if she just had a horrible experience? Same goes for the guys, many on here are probably really good dudes, but let’s face it probably half the guys out there are pieces of shit. I’d bet every one of these women have some terrible tales. So yeah, a refund to a stranger just because they claim a bad experience is never gonna happen nor should it. If everyone was genuine and caring then sure, but that’s not the case now more than ever.
Hrmm.. Giving a refund for shit behaviour may invite abuse.. and yet, zero consequences may incentivize further shit behaviour.
The conundrum, like this argument, won't end.
The behaviour was reprehensible.. but only the OP knows if he acted appropriately with the SP.
The SP's isn't going to speak up.
And it's up to the brothel if they want to keep a client happy or not.
They are likely busy enough to not care.
This will also likely blow over in less than a week.
Now go watch the game!
