Gigi 0598

Maddyloveskanax

New member
Dec 2, 2024
19
3
3
She is the girl living with candy.
Ratings 0/5.
Expectations: wished never paid
Once I was in, she was rushing me to give the money. Sent me to shower, was checking my bag when i was in shower and maybe stole some cash. Then for bj she was just stroking inside outside her mouth not even taking inside. When came to sex, she was hiding her pussy, when my boy came near she was using hands not letting me go inside. When I said i want doggy, she became aggressive and finally when I in her, she kicked me so hard. I told her to give my money back, she then stopped everything and thought corporates but I was already in off mood. Don’t do the mistake which I did. This was for the boys I took the plunge. Really disappointed, photos don’t match too. I will never ever go to this agency. There are better fishes in the market , I would wait and get 200$ plus but will never repeat this cheap disgusting sp’s.
https://www.luxygirls.cc/gigi/
 

Ygg

Member
Aug 20, 2024
30
24
8
In my previous comment about this agent, I said sometimes they will give you a gem girl, sometimes you will get a biggg scam. Every time when you booked them just be like open a mystery box.

If a girl not matching with pics, even worse, the only way just turn around, leave fast, without any thinking. (If you still thinking-damn I’m already here, anyway let’s do it.-you will lose your moneys and 100% regrets after) that’s also how they stole your money. anyway sorry to heard your experience, and thanks for sharing.
 
Last edited:

Maddyloveskanax

New member
Dec 2, 2024
19
3
3
She took like 10-15 bucks. Yeah ygg you are correct, but what I have realised it’s better to go for quality anything less than 200 sp is waste.
 

vancouveroriental2023

Supporting Member
Jul 24, 2023
151
111
43
Vancouver
www.vancouverasianescort.com
She is the girl living with candy.
Ratings 0/5.
Expectations: wished never paid
Once I was in, she was rushing me to give the money. Sent me to shower, was checking my bag when i was in shower and maybe stole some cash. Then for bj she was just stroking inside outside her mouth not even taking inside. When came to sex, she was hiding her pussy, when my boy came near she was using hands not letting me go inside. When I said i want doggy, she became aggressive and finally when I in her, she kicked me so hard. I told her to give my money back, she then stopped everything and thought corporates but I was already in off mood. Don’t do the mistake which I did. This was for the boys I took the plunge. Really disappointed, photos don’t match too. I will never ever go to this agency. There are better fishes in the market , I would wait and get 200$ plus but will never repeat this cheap disgusting sp’s.
https://www.luxygirls.cc/gigi/
Sorry to hear that we are come to kick her out right away.
 

String_Slayer

Member
Oct 3, 2023
40
36
18
That would invite abusers of good faith.
That’s a slippery slope argument by assuming that refunding one verified victim will somehow unleash a wave of scammers. Accountability doesn’t work that way. When an agency admits someone was assaulted and robbed, refunding isn’t generosity, it’s the bare minimum.
 

SuggestiveTitle

Can’t ReMember
Feb 28, 2022
149
206
43
Which is why I was surprised the handler posted on PERB about firing the lady without even yet talking to her.
yeeaahhh.. pretty sure that was to dowse the brush fire that was kicking up.. one name change and photo swap later and it could be the same girl working for quite awhile. But to the points already made.. it may take more than one client's withdrawal of support to trigger a full return of funds.. but withdrawal of the many might be felt deeply enough. That behaviour should simply not be allowed to stand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coldwinter

nbones

New member
Nov 8, 2024
20
23
3
Holy crap that is the worst I've read in a long time.Thanks for the info. I will never book with this agency. The travelling asian sps are all assumed to be fake at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tro63man

Final Impact

Member
May 19, 2010
55
31
18
That’s a slippery slope argument by assuming that refunding one verified victim will somehow unleash a wave of scammers. Accountability doesn’t work that way. When an agency admits someone was assaulted and robbed, refunding isn’t generosity, it’s the bare minimum.
And that's where the issue lies. There can be scammers on both sides. It's naive to say that either side has pure intentions 100% of the time. It will be up to both parties discretion. Remember the "me too" and "trust all women" movements? Sure there were legitimate claims but it opened up discussions to the point where a ton FALSE claims were being made to socialy persecute guys without the claimant women ever filing official reports.
 
Vancouver Escorts