That she is willing to do this totally blows me away. That she thinks it is ok, that she suggested it, that she told you about it all, that you felt the rather perplexing need to come here and post that it is being considered at all (I'll allow that a banned member can't come on and do it herself, but still). I think you sort of miss the point that no one, above all me, cares whether the text/pics were or were not solicited by digger. I was simply suggesting an alternate explanation, since you had not stated that you had first hand knowledge by viewing the history lol. When you "suggest" things "might" have happened a certain way, you invite others to speculate alternates that are just as believable lol.
Edmonton's Top SP??
- Thread starter Dark_Knight
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Well boys this has been fun, I am actually going to go back to work and get something constructive done today.
The truth will surface and that is going to be one hell of a funny day.
Have a wonderful afternoon.
The truth will surface and that is going to be one hell of a funny day.
Have a wonderful afternoon.
Seems to me the truth has surfaced with regard to your girl and I don't think its at all funny......Well boys this has been fun, I am actually going to go back to work and get something constructive done today.
The truth will surface and that is going to be one hell of a funny day.
Have a wonderful afternoon.
look at it from a different perspective. do you not think that if i saw my ATF in public, and just walked up to her, called her by her SP name, and started talking to her, with no regard for anything, that she would be pisssed and would more than likely never wanna have me as a client? it is called mutual respect for a reason.
Oh, and about your analogy here:
The appropriate parallel would be you, seeing your "ATF" in public, and then handing the phone to your little brother or sister and having them dial the number of said ATF before a conversation that ensued for twenty minutes.
Until you people can understand and incorporate the definition of the term "mutual", you have no business critiquing JessicaR for anything she opted to do once the other party violated the presumed "mutual respect" clause.
Hmm, the number of that phone is kinda posted up on a couple of rather racy websites. I'm pretty sure it's posted in a few places on this particular site. If she wasn't prepared to talk shop, maybe not answering the work phone would have been an option.
What do you mean jpr comming on to perb was way after the fact? She posted the very same day.
And really,if you want to be more accurate about who communicated the "personal contact information" to the SO, it was Jessica herself when she sent the pic/text to my phone which was charging in my garage. The info wouldn't have been there if she hadn't have sent it.
It kinda gets a bit less clear when you look at it that way. (<---that would look way more dramatic if I knew how to write in those large colorful letters like you use SeekSteady)
Regardless of whether "the number of that phone" is posted all over the world, the means through which your wife acquired the number was not in line with those who might wish to do business and dial Jessica for sex. Nor was it a purely random prank phone call done by a group of teenagers in Poughkeepsie. Your wife dialed that number specifically to engage in conversation a woman whom she thought you were boffing, or might be very soon.
Any phone communication between the two of you - seemingly regular client/provider - is well within the bounds of "mutual discretion". Once YOU let Jessica's number go beyond your closed circle of two, in direct violation of that understood pact of mutual discretion, then anything that happens to you in this case is on your shoulders, and not hers.
What you are doing now is akin to trying to take it out on a street walker who leaves a condom wrapper in your vehicle when your wife borrows the car and finds the wrapper. In a perfect world the girls would always take the wrapper with them and dispose of it, but at some point the condom wrapper in the car becomes your responsibility in the eyes of your wife.
Had the same mythical street-walking working girl left a bag of cocaine in your car, and had the police been the ones to find it instead of your wife, do you really imagine you would be able to play this game of suggesting somebody else is more guilty than you are?
Admittedly there is some bizzarre sense of entitlement felt by the married men who keep this business thriving, and that sort of stupidity is what gives any traction at all to your arguments and has all of these clowns chiming in and trying to support your lost cause.
Looking back on your posts... you've not been active in this biz for too long, and I truly hope there is still room for you to return to civilian life without being further drawn-in by the underworld in which we all circulate. I hope that you can remove your intense focus from JR and apply that energy to repairing things at home.
At least you admit your mistake and take responsibility for it.Actually VJ, I had texted her earlier. A reply which showed up later is what got the SO's attention. Yes I was careless leaving my phone out.
The point I was trying to make was only in response to SeekSteady's insistance that I was solely to blame for providing the contact info. The incoming text is what contained the info.
Did I ever tell her she shouldn't or couldn't text me? No. I had actually had text conversations with her in the past. Yes I should have expected the posibility that a text could show up.
OK folks, this has to end.
We're closing this thread.
We suggest that if anyone wants to keep up the discussion and the point-counter-point that you contact a mod first.
We're closing this thread.
We suggest that if anyone wants to keep up the discussion and the point-counter-point that you contact a mod first.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
