Dutchman, 69, brings lawsuit to lower his age 20 years

Dec 18, 2016
773
32
18
Oak Bay, Victoria
"You can change your name. You can change your gender. Why not your age?"




Emile Ratelband, 69, wants to shift his birthday from 11 March 1949 to 11 March 1969, comparing the change to identifying as being transgender.

"We live in a time when you can change your name and change your gender. Why can't I decide my own age?" he said.

A local court in the eastern city of Arnhem is expected to rule on the case within four weeks.

However officials were sceptical about the case, believing there was no legal mechanism allowing a person to change their birth date, local reports said.

One of the judges wanted to know what would become of the 20 years that Mr Ratelband wanted to erase. "Who were your parents looking after then? Who was that little boy?" he was quoted as saying.

'Making the most of life'
Mr Ratelband argues he feels discriminated against because of his age, and that it was affecting his employment chances and his success rate on the dating app, Tinder.

"When I'm 69, I am limited. If I'm 49, then I can buy a new house, drive a different car. I can take up more work," he said.

"When I'm on Tinder and it says I'm 69, I don't get an answer. When I'm 49, with the face I have, I will be in a luxurious position."

Mr Ratelband further argued that according to his doctors he has the body of a 45-year-old, and described himself as a "young god".

He went on Facebook last year to describe how he had made the decision one day standing in front of a mirror, not because he feared getting old but because he wanted to make the most of life for as long as possible.

He also said he would renounce his pension if he switched his birth date.

Mr Ratelband, a media personality and motivational guru, converted to Buddhism earlier this year and is a trainer in neurolinguistic programming.

He voiced the character Vladimir Trunkov in the Dutch-language version of the Pixar film Cars 2.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46133262
 

Lo-ki

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2011
4,022
2,654
113
Check your closet..:)
Your only born on one date........:)
 

italian233

Member
Jan 12, 2014
204
6
18
Well alot people want to be younger but trying to knock 20 years off is delusional. Him citing tinder as a reason is funny but kinda gross.
 
Last edited:

whistlerboi

Stay frisky my friends.
Mar 25, 2017
74
45
18
Younger than your age, why not?

Ok so I get that he's actually younger than his chronological age. Age is just a number, let's be honest. Good for him, but yes 20 years might be a stretch.

I had one SP give me 15 years younger but of course I think she was just trying to make me feel good, duh. But it felt good. And I appreciated the compliment :)

On a related topic, Daylight "Saving". Why do we mess with clocks in some jurisdictions twice a year if time isn't for the fact that time is fluid and movable?
 
Last edited:
Dec 18, 2016
773
32
18
Oak Bay, Victoria
A Dutch court has rejected the request of a self-styled “positivity guru” to shave 20 years off his age, in a case that drew worldwide attention.

Last month Emile Ratelband asked the court in Arnhem to formally change his date of birth to make him 49. He said his official age did not reflect his emotional state and it was causing him to struggle to find work and love.

He claimed he did not feel 69 and said his request was consistent with other forms of personal transformation gaining acceptance around the world, such as the right to change name or gender.

In a written ruling on Monday, the court said Dutch law assigned rights and obligations based on age “such as the right to vote and the duty to attend school. If Mr Ratelband’s request was allowed, those age requirements would become meaningless.”

In a press statement, the court said: “Mr Ratelband is at liberty to feel 20 years younger than his real age and to act accordingly. But amending his date of birth would cause 20 years of records to vanish from the register of births, deaths, marriages and registered partnerships. This would have a variety of undesirable legal and societal implications.”

The court said it acknowledged “a trend in society for people to feel fit and healthy for longer, but did not regard that as a valid argument for amending a person’s date of birth”.

It said Ratelband failed to convince the court that he suffered from age discrimination, adding that “there are other alternatives available for challenging age discrimination, rather than amending a person’s date of birth”.

Ratelband was undeterred by the court’s rejection and vowed to appeal. “This is great!” he said. “The rejection of {the] court is great … because they give all kinds of angles where we can connect when we go in appeal.”

He said he was the first of “thousands of people who want to change their age”.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...quest-20-years-younger?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
 

clu

Active member
Oct 3, 2010
1,268
14
38
Vancouver
The court has a point obviously. Age of record is chronological not biological. You don't get to vote or drink earlier just because you hit puberty early. Improvements in maintaining biological age may redefine what a chronological age of 69 implies, but we're still going to call it age 69.
 

jamasianman

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2015
1,477
330
83
If he was worried about not getting a date off tinder then he will be relieved to know that no one will want to date him ever again!
 
Vancouver Escorts