The fact that you are a liar is a completely different issue from whether or not you have outed clients.
Care to provide some evidence to the jury? I don't know you or vice versa.
jjinvan said:
I don't recall ever saying that you outed anyone, if I did, please point out where.
I'm not sure what you meant either but I think when I said that I don't burn bridges I'd have to build them first to burn them. I've never outted clients. your following post was all the more confusing leaving to read it to believe that I have.
Creole Lady Marmalade said:
I look for dates and pics on the identification, not the names.
jjinvan said:
And all pooners just care about an SPs mind, and not her body...
And anyone who believes either of the above can PM me cuz I've got a bridge to sell them at an AWESOME price.
Your big problem is that you go off into different tangents and making strong accusations without an offer of proof as well as consistently evading the questions asked in retort.
jjinvan said:
This post is about discretion.
Someone (other than myself) points out that the OP herself asks for photo ID and refuses to answer calls unless she can record the calling phone number and name via caller ID (don't say you don't 'record' it, I have yet to see a caller ID device without any memory).
Take the time to do a little investigating with my site and the claims you and others are making. I have no shame on what I ask for.
1) If you notice the requests for photo ID are to provide for proof of age. A name just won't cut it.
2)
WHERE does it say I record the phone numbers off a call display? I clear the call logs as often as every hour.
Why would I need to keep phone numbers of say, "missed calls"? Do I call those numbers back? No.
What would be the point in keeping those numbers?
jjinvan said:
The OP then replies that she 'does not look at the names' but only the picture and birthdate (has to make sure that the 50somethings are over 19 I guess??).
Explain why a name would be relevent in producing photo ID for proof of age, or proof of educational endeavour status.
jjinvan said:
It is somehow 'wrong' to question the absurdity of insisting on photo ID and then claiming to 'not look at the name', and that a guy be naive enough to actually BELIEVE such a statement.
It isn't wrong to question, it's wrong when you haven't put any thought into your conspiracies. Think for a moment before shooting your mouth off.
One instance where I will record a name and ID number on photo identification is in the event of a credit card being used. To make sure I don't get frauded out of money as well as protecting the clients from theft and fraud. I would want to make sure the name on the card is in fact the genuine cardholder. I put "see identification" on the back of my credit card to prevent that possibility.
Just like anyone I imagine, I don't want to be taken advantage of and in this industry it happens often. If asking for photo ID to provide the necessary proof for the client to benefit from a price break is not something that is within the comfort levels of the prospective client all they have to do is look elsewhere. Nobody is hurt in the process. I'm a big girl I can handle it if someone doesn't want to produce what I've requested there are plenty of people who will. We all have options.
Again, JJ, just what are you trying to get at? Of all those instances/questions you asked, you have put very little thought into them. What am I going to do with a whole bunch of numbers that essentially mean nothing to me? Why would I keep a log of phone numbers from a call display whether they were active clients or just inquiries?
You are good at asking questions but fall short of finding a motive behind the inquiry for them to be asked in the first place.