The Porn Dude

Discretion

Status
Not open for further replies.

BcMod

SEMI RETIRED FROM PERB
Jul 7, 2006
272
8
18
Okay guys, try to stay on topic, this thread has already taken up way too much of my time. I don't want to have to edit it for hijacking too.
 

athaire

Inactive Pooner
Aug 18, 2006
2,464
14
38
59
Land of the living skies
Okay guys, try to stay on topic, this thread has already taken up way too much of my time. I don't want to have to edit it for hijacking too.
I hope they don't make you edit for Hijacking........you would be one busy Mod as almost everythread gets hijacked........;)
 

Creole Lady Marmalade

No more reviews, please.
Dec 20, 2004
1,467
2
0
And all pooners just care about an SPs mind, and not her body...

And anyone who believes either of the above can PM me cuz I've got a bridge to sell them at an AWESOME price.
JJ, I think you need to ask yourself if that were true then why would I be expanding my business instead of going down in flames like any SP would betraying or abusing privileges as described on my site as well as in posts. An SP outting even one client, gets out and is heard and in turn her being avoided.

As Ropey mentioned you are calling me a liar. I'd be curious to see just how many clients I've outted and whom since you have the inside story and all. Bring it on.
 

Quarter Mile'r

Injected and Blown
May 17, 2005
3,597
134
63
Out of Town
Creole Lady MarmaladeI didn't think we needed to get into a semantic argument over this in this particular thread however since you challenged...
Uhh, since I challenged? What was challenging in my original
statement, I was mearly stating a fact which you must have
missed?

Ummm, please clarify why you want to escalate this to an argument as you stated above. Who the hell is suggesting anything about an argument on this topic other than you?? When all I was doing was relaying his ACTUAL post about BH wanting to be deactivated??


Blowhard requested to have his account "deactivated". Now regardless of what the actual wording of it was (close, delete, deactivate, etc.) when a user requests to close their account it is still listed as "banned" under their handle if they've haven't also asked to have all their posts cleared as well.

This makes me wonder what you were thinking when you posted this:

if you knew he never wanted to be banned.:confused:
Okay, so where does the challenge you stated I put up front
when you admit to what he said above about being
"deactivated,deleted etc"? I don't get it, where was I
challenging you for christ sake???

This was BH's original request to be deactivated AS Blowhard, not to be banned. At least that way he could come back as a new entity on the same IP. Not unlike others who get banned but reregister again from a different location/IP. Guess he'll have to do the same then as others have done. Who knows.

But I don't make the rules here honey so what's the point of turning this
into an argument cuz it sure as hell wasn't my intent and I guess BH didn't
understand the rules here about deactivation/banning.

I hope that explains it cuz as they say, don't shoot the messenger.
Maybe BH should have done a bit more questioning to the Mods before
making that post in the lounge asking to be "deactivated"?



...........QM'r
 

Quarter Mile'r

Injected and Blown
May 17, 2005
3,597
134
63
Out of Town
Okay guys, try to stay on topic, this thread has already taken up way too much of my time. I don't want to have to edit it for hijacking too.

Ooooops, just noticed this. Sorry dude hope you don't mind me
answering a "challenge" ?


...........QM'r
 

spelunker

New member
Jan 10, 2006
17
0
1
Vancouver
SP's identity

To get back on topic. I have seen this SP a couple of times, she is really hot and I would like to keep seeing her. Trouble is I found out her real identity, in fact we have a common acquaintance.

Question is: should I just stop seeing her? Tell her what I know and let her decide? Or not say anything and just leave things as they are? I know she is very secretive about what she does, so I'm not sure how she will react.

Did I mention she is really hot and probably the first SP I've been with that seems to enjoy the sessions as much as I do.
 

Quarter Mile'r

Injected and Blown
May 17, 2005
3,597
134
63
Out of Town
To get back on topic. I have seen this SP a couple of times, she is really hot and I would like to keep seeing her. Trouble is I found out her real identity, in fact we have a common acquaintance.

Question is: should I just stop seeing her? Tell her what I know and let her decide? Or not say anything and just leave things as they are? I know she is very secretive about what she does, so I'm not sure how she will react.

Did I mention she is really hot and probably the first SP I've been with that seems to enjoy the sessions as much as I do.
What is so hard about understanding the word "discretion"?
Sure you might know the ladies name etc., just NEVER use it against
her or let anyone else know.

Pooning is for fun dude. If you find out things you/her would rather not know, forget them !! And move on !!

I know a few SP's real names that I've been honoured with, they will
go to my grave with me. That is what discretion is all about.


............QM'r
 

spelunker

New member
Jan 10, 2006
17
0
1
Vancouver
Duh! Of course I'm not going to tell anyone or use it against her, I understand discretion perfectly especially because it's a two way street. The complication in this case is the common friend. What if we end up at the same party or something. I think I could handle it I'm just not sure about her and if I should give her the heads up or not.
 

jjinvan

New member
Apr 4, 2005
689
0
0
This post is about discretion.

Someone (other than myself) points out that the OP herself asks for photo ID and refuses to answer calls unless she can record the calling phone number and name via caller ID (don't say you don't 'record' it, I have yet to see a caller ID device without any memory).

The OP then replies that she 'does not look at the names' but only the picture and birthdate (has to make sure that the 50somethings are over 19 I guess??).

But, according to the supposed 2 month wonder Ropey, who somehow has full knowledge of posts that were deleted much more than 2 months ago, but has never used other IDs...

It is somehow 'wrong' to question the absurdity of insisting on photo ID and then claiming to 'not look at the name', and that a guy be naive enough to actually BELIEVE such a statement.
 

apple juice

New member
Jul 7, 2006
206
1
0
Edmonton
Discretion...

1. The quality of being discreet...
2. Ability or power to decide responsibly...
3. Freedom to act or judge on ones own...

I don't see much discretion going on here...:rolleyes:
 

apple juice

New member
Jul 7, 2006
206
1
0
Edmonton
Sometimes one must needs fight fire with fire. I agree wholeheartedly with your view apple juice and hope that the future after this thread shows a higher degree of user discretion than the past prior to this thread. :D
Sounds good Ropey...but I don't understand...how can you fight fire with fire...wouldn't it just keep burning then? This doesn't sound logical to me...:p
 

apple juice

New member
Jul 7, 2006
206
1
0
Edmonton
Oh...

This is how many large and fast moving fires are fought apple juice. A "Fire-Break" is created so that when the fire reaches it, there is no more fuel left as the area reached has been already burned out. Often they will burn out a large area so that the coming fire has no fuel.

The fire then dies unless it can move past the fire-break. :)
Thank you...now I know...:)
 
Jun 20, 2005
786
0
0
The Wet Coast
1) I have had MANY pooners and SPs real names given to me by other SPs and pooners.
Why the hell would anyone give you this information? It is hard for me to conceive of any good intent behind anyone who would do such a thing.

I do know the real name of one SP and I sincerely wish I didn't know it (as nothing good came from the knowledge). I would never tell anyone this information - it is no one's business!
 

Creole Lady Marmalade

No more reviews, please.
Dec 20, 2004
1,467
2
0
The fact that you are a liar is a completely different issue from whether or not you have outed clients.
Care to provide some evidence to the jury? I don't know you or vice versa.
jjinvan said:
I don't recall ever saying that you outed anyone, if I did, please point out where.
I'm not sure what you meant either but I think when I said that I don't burn bridges I'd have to build them first to burn them. I've never outted clients. your following post was all the more confusing leaving to read it to believe that I have.
Creole Lady Marmalade said:
I look for dates and pics on the identification, not the names.
jjinvan said:
And all pooners just care about an SPs mind, and not her body...

And anyone who believes either of the above can PM me cuz I've got a bridge to sell them at an AWESOME price.
Your big problem is that you go off into different tangents and making strong accusations without an offer of proof as well as consistently evading the questions asked in retort.
jjinvan said:
This post is about discretion.

Someone (other than myself) points out that the OP herself asks for photo ID and refuses to answer calls unless she can record the calling phone number and name via caller ID (don't say you don't 'record' it, I have yet to see a caller ID device without any memory).
Take the time to do a little investigating with my site and the claims you and others are making. I have no shame on what I ask for.
1) If you notice the requests for photo ID are to provide for proof of age. A name just won't cut it.
2) WHERE does it say I record the phone numbers off a call display? I clear the call logs as often as every hour. Why would I need to keep phone numbers of say, "missed calls"? Do I call those numbers back? No. What would be the point in keeping those numbers?
jjinvan said:
The OP then replies that she 'does not look at the names' but only the picture and birthdate (has to make sure that the 50somethings are over 19 I guess??).
Explain why a name would be relevent in producing photo ID for proof of age, or proof of educational endeavour status.
jjinvan said:
It is somehow 'wrong' to question the absurdity of insisting on photo ID and then claiming to 'not look at the name', and that a guy be naive enough to actually BELIEVE such a statement.
It isn't wrong to question, it's wrong when you haven't put any thought into your conspiracies. Think for a moment before shooting your mouth off.

One instance where I will record a name and ID number on photo identification is in the event of a credit card being used. To make sure I don't get frauded out of money as well as protecting the clients from theft and fraud. I would want to make sure the name on the card is in fact the genuine cardholder. I put "see identification" on the back of my credit card to prevent that possibility.

Just like anyone I imagine, I don't want to be taken advantage of and in this industry it happens often. If asking for photo ID to provide the necessary proof for the client to benefit from a price break is not something that is within the comfort levels of the prospective client all they have to do is look elsewhere. Nobody is hurt in the process. I'm a big girl I can handle it if someone doesn't want to produce what I've requested there are plenty of people who will. We all have options.


Again, JJ, just what are you trying to get at? Of all those instances/questions you asked, you have put very little thought into them. What am I going to do with a whole bunch of numbers that essentially mean nothing to me? Why would I keep a log of phone numbers from a call display whether they were active clients or just inquiries?
You are good at asking questions but fall short of finding a motive behind the inquiry for them to be asked in the first place.
 

Creole Lady Marmalade

No more reviews, please.
Dec 20, 2004
1,467
2
0
Are you fuckin' shittin' me, right now?

Uhh, since I challenged? What was challenging in my original
statement, I was mearly stating a fact which you must have
missed?

Ummm, please clarify why you want to escalate this to an argument as you stated above. Who the hell is suggesting anything about an argument on this topic other than you?? When all I was doing was relaying his ACTUAL post about BH wanting to be deactivated??




Okay, so where does the challenge you stated I put up front
when you admit to what he said above about being
"deactivated,deleted etc"? I don't get it, where was I
challenging you for christ sake???

This was BH's original request to be deactivated AS Blowhard, not to be banned. At least that way he could come back as a new entity on the same IP. Not unlike others who get banned but reregister again from a different location/IP. Guess he'll have to do the same then as others have done. Who knows.

But I don't make the rules here honey so what's the point of turning this
into an argument cuz it sure as hell wasn't my intent and I guess BH didn't
understand the rules here about deactivation/banning.

I hope that explains it cuz as they say, don't shoot the messenger.
Maybe BH should have done a bit more questioning to the Mods before
making that post in the lounge asking to be "deactivated"?



...........QM'r
QM, there really is no need for you to get bent out of shape over this. Geez, why so testy? It's no big deal.

-It was you who asked Blowhard was banned for creating drama. YOU made that statement.
Quarter Mile'r said:
And Blowhard was banned for creating drama??
-I corrected you and said that Blowhard requested to be banned.
-You then stated that Blowhard requested to have his account "deactivated" not banned

Is there really a need to get into technical terms over this? Regardless of what word is used "banned" or "deactivate" they mean the same thing when the user requested it as Blowhard had!

Now, did we really need to get into the semantics over a word when they meant the same thing? The challenge came when you responded and tried to "correct". The argument came when you, again, responded and insisted on going over, possibly correcting, technical terms of Blowhards plans for his account.


Sheesh!
What a fuckin' waste of time. That's 3 minutes of my life I will never get back responding to this post and other related posts.
 

metoo113

Member
Aug 2, 2002
407
0
16
Somewhere Down The Crazy River
Good Lord, some of you people need to get out more. Too much drama!!!!
 

TotallyTouchin

TOTALLY TOUCHABLE
Oct 22, 2005
602
3
0
44
Vancouver
Haha!

Has anybody seen TTT at VRZ yet?:D

Yeah I saw this guy named Michael Johnson. He lives at 928 Richards st. unit 705...I don't know the buzzer number though...DARN IT! He told me he has a daschund who likes the green type of milkbones...on mondays mostly. He said he once tried the milkbones and kinda liked the taste....but not to tell. So no one say anything ok?

He was having some relationship problems which is because his penis is only 4.5 inches (it seemed more like 4.2 to me...). It's too bad too because he looks really good when he dresses up in my panties and dances around...(that's his private fetish...don't tell k?) He said he likes Bette Midler when he dances in satin and Liza when dances in silk...just a private thing he has to make it special:) Too bad about his hairy back...oh well!

I just felt bad because he wants to get back together with his girlfriend-so nobody call him at 604-555-1234. He said his girlfriend is usually home at 5 so for SURE no one call then ok?:D

Anyways....let's get back to discretion.....:D



(tongue firmly planted in cheek for those people who didn't get that....);)

EDIT!

OH YEAH...I want to be discreet but if you want to hear about our session, pm him! HINT! His handle begins with T and ends with WISTER....so if you want to hear more, just pm him...just don't say I said anything K?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Vancouver Escorts