Details with reviews - discussion thread

[Uncled]

Hold over from years and years ago when people thought that by using browns and reds would save them from prosecution in they were ever traced to this board. What judge or lawyer wouldn't be able to put 1 and 1 together to figure they were talking about money is beyond me.

"No your honor, we were talking about sweet potatoes, not money"

If you admit to giving anything in exchange for sex (cash, drugs, roses, chicken nuggets), you have committed an offence under the current prostitution laws.

So saying that you gave an SP "300 roses" will not save your ass in a court of law.

No one would believe that anyways. You would need a wheel barrow to bring that many flowers to her room.

 

[georgej]

I would love to see comment on language skills of visitors something like AF does

 

[carsman123]

Agreed about language and how strong their English is. Personally, I like to talk and have back and forths besides just in the moment dirty talk. I'd love to know if a gal is someone I can chat with and keep a mental note about them being an option.

 

[westwoody]

The most annoying issue with reviews is guys hijacking a review about “xxx” to tell everyone how great “yyy” is.
Second most annoying issue is the lazy dogfuckers who can’t read the whole thread and ask questions that have been answered several times already.
Lack of juicy details is no big deal by comparison.

 

[Newuser505]

The most annoying issue with reviews is guys hijacking a review about “xxx” to tell everyone how great “yyy” is.
Second most annoying issue is the lazy dogfuckers who can’t read the whole thread and ask questions that have been answered several times already.
Lack of juicy details is no big deal by comparison.

We get annoyed by the idiots asking idiot questions on a review board. Just imagine what the SPs or handlers have to go through everyday.

The 1000th "you avail?" Would have me saying yes so i could strangulate the client.

 

[westwoody]

We get annoyed by the idiots asking idiot questions on a review board. Just imagine what the SPs or handlers have to go through everyday.

It’s rampant on all kinds of boards.

I’m on a tech board. A highly regarded member posts a detailed review about a new tool, where he got it, how much it cost. Ten pages in a guy asks how much it costs and where can you get them.
Guys like go on ignore. They’re toxic and they add nothing but white noise.

 

[Newuser505]

It’s rampant on all kinds of boards.

I’m on a tech board. A highly regarded member posts a detailed review about a new tool, where he got it, how much it cost. Ten pages in a guy asks how much it costs and where can you get them.
Guys like go on ignore. They’re toxic and they add nothing but white noise.

Agree. Though i dont think theyre doing it out of spite. Its more so that they are simply incompetent.

If only they have the presence of mind to reread the review to see if their question is already answered, they could prevent themselves from looking like a total nob.

 

[ChromeGasCap]

It’s rampant on all kinds of boards.

I’m on a tech board. A highly regarded member posts a detailed review about a new tool, where he got it, how much it cost. Ten pages in a guy asks how much it costs and where can you get them.
Guys like go on ignore. They’re toxic and they add nothing but white noise.

I do not go on tech boards for that very reason.

 

[Larry's Torch]

I have been seeing people using "browns" lately and it's so unnecessary 🤧

I always thought that was the additional amount for anal

(snip)
"2 browns 1 pink"
(snip)

That's a shocker.


Sometimes this place is comedy gold.

I'm here all week.

 

[Once you go black]

My favourite are the guys who are always whining / outright complaining in the comment section of other peoples reviews ,
about other members not leaving enough reviews ,

but they themselves have not left a single review ( maybe one tops ) in the eight years I’ve been reading perb .

 

[MB Mod]

Another issue that’s been coming up lately is members piggybacking reviews, if you want to write a review about the same girl start a new thread don’t add it to an existing review. If the original review gets taken down for whatever reason yours will disappear as well.

 

[masterpoonhunter]

Another issue that’s been coming up lately is members piggybacking reviews, if you want to write a review about the same girl start a new thread don’t add it to an existing review. If the original review gets taken down for whatever reason yours will disappear as well.

Not being difficult here but this is a bit confusing.
I read this as:
Review is written by the OP.
I have seen the same SP and want to add my 2bits which could be considered an additional Review or could be Comments.
It is piggybacking on the OP's review. I have done this many times in the review boards and in fact I always thought this is what makes the boards work.
No?
Or have I interpreted this all wrong?

 

[ChromeGasCap]

IMHO
It is a good thing to contribute to a review thread, however, many times the contribution is just a means for someone to dominate the thread and ultimately highjack the thread.
When I look back, I can say that I have done this, and I am now conscious of this and try to avoid doing this.
It can be disrespectful and exposes a persons ego.

EDIT: There are some members in some threads, I swear are on there home PC using an expensive tactile keyboard.
I used to feed my ego a couple of decades ago, to hear the sound of my own key clicks..

 

[rinamood]

IMHO
It is a good thing to contribute to a review thread, however, many times the contribution is just a means for someone to dominate the thread and ultimately highjack the thread.
When I look back, I can say that I have done this, and I am now conscious of this and try to avoid doing this.
It can be disrespectful and exposes a persons ego.

There are people who piggyback on reviews knowing that most members who have participated in the thread will have the "watch" feature for the thread turned on by default. This way, they are having multiple others receive notifications for their piggybacked review, and can receive more attention this way. Who knows - maybe most people don't think this far, but this is the result regardless.

I also find it disrespectful to the original reviewer who had written the thread. I agree that it exposes the ego of the person piggybacking.

As a provider, I would prefer clients to post separate review threads.

Not being difficult here but this is a bit confusing.
I read this as:
Review is written by the OP.
I have seen the same SP and want to add my 2bits which could be considered an additional Review or could be Comments.
It is piggybacking on the OP's review. I have done this many times in the review boards and in fact I always thought this is what makes the boards work.
No?
Or have I interpreted this all wrong?

My opinion is that if the content added by your response COULD be considered a review on its own, then it's a review 😂 If it's a short corroboration of someone else's perspective and could not be considered a review, then maybe it's not a review and simply a few comments - like Wikipedia "stubs". It comes down to mod discretion what stays and what goes on this board anyways.

 

[GeeBeeP]

Not being difficult here but this is a bit confusing.
I read this as:
Review is written by the OP.
I have seen the same SP and want to add my 2bits which could be considered an additional Review or could be Comments.
It is piggybacking on the OP's review. I have done this many times in the review boards and in fact I always thought this is what makes the boards work.
No?
Or have I interpreted this all wrong?

I agree with this view.

If I see a review that echos the same experience I had with someone, posting a simple note on the same thread saying something to that effect seems much simpler. As a reader/user of PERB reviews, seeing several replies like this to a review thread is an indication that the SP is consistent (either good or bad) without clogging up the board with needless repetition.

 

[MB Mod]

Not being difficult here but this is a bit confusing.
I read this as:
Review is written by the OP.
I have seen the same SP and want to add my 2bits which could be considered an additional Review or could be Comments.
It is piggybacking on the OP's review. I have done this many times in the review boards and in fact I always thought this is what makes the boards work.
No?
Or have I interpreted this all wrong?

To clarify if you post “ nice review I agree with you“ that’s not piggybacking, if you post a full stand alone review that’s piggybacking

 

[Pumped]

I've piggybacked on a number of reviews mainly to add additional information that the OP didn't bother to include.

So many reviews are basically "Hey, I finally got laid!" and by whom (and often doesn't include her looks, attitude, service or rates which is what we're interested in).

I will stop doing it.

 

[VinVan]

This all seems to fly in the face of the orher review edict of not posting a new review of the same provider within 3 months (or whatever the time frame is - I forgot) …

 

[masterpoonhunter]

I've piggybacked on a number of reviews mainly to add additional information that the OP didn't bother to include.

So many reviews are basically "Hey, I finally got laid!" and by whom (and often doesn't include her looks, attitude, service or rates which is what we're interested in).

I will stop doing it.

Apparently I have to stop this too.
Still a confusing thing here as a lot of the fun in contributing is to share the experiences we all have and in my opinion flies in the face of forum activity

 

[Pumped]

Apparently I have to stop this too.
Still a confusing thing here as a lot of the fun in contributing is to share the experiences we all have and in my opinion flies in the face of forum activity

My take is that posting a completely new review for an SP seems worse than helping a review be better by providing missing information.

One thread on one SP that provides a fairly complete picture seems better than a number of random reviews of her.

But I guess it doesn't help boost the review count.