The thing with stereotypes is, they do tend to be true, and those who focus solely on the outliers believe that proves the truth incorrect, when in fact it's the opposite. That's a fallacy. Because the outlier would be you in this case; that being one who is a "higher-tier escort" as opposed to those who work the mid-track, or lower.
I understand that all providers come from all walks of life, but I'd place good money that most who work the "high-track" are intelligent and well-adjusted, coming from strong family backgrounds and values. And of that breed of people, there are those with a certain cultural mindset, that could navigate through the hardships better than most who work on tracks of lower tiers. That people like you have a plan, long term goals, tracking milestones to know when to bow out of the game before "the house takes you" for playing too long...
...but that doesn't mean these stereotypes aren't valid either. For myself, I look for the middle of the mid-track and high-track, and I can obviously see that at least one of these stereotypes apply to them.
>She’s an escort, she must not have a present father or father figure.
This can go either way. Even with a strong parental figure in their life, telling them "not to do a thing" if they wanted to be a good strong productive person, they'll do it anyway. "Eve ate the apple", right? The provider in question would have a strong sense of self-entitlement to go ahead and do it anyways. I know this from personal experience as a girl I went to high-school with, hung out in the same circles, turned to prostitution because (no joke) her parents wouldn't buy her a cellphone. This was in the late 90s, fyi; before Iphones and the internet. The father was a lawyer, told her if she wanted something like that, she should get a job and pay for it herself. A lesson of self-reliance, that normal parents impose on their child. So she chose prostitution instead of going to Wal-Mart or McDonalds; and yes, she was a senior in high-school. She was an upper-middle class princess, high GPA, who chose the easy path, instead of the righteous one.
>She was probably se*ually abused as a teen*ger.
There's an opinion on this. But the last time I mentioned it I got flamed to hell, except one guy telling me: Women hold two cards in this game: "Consent and Deniability"...and that's all I'll say.
>They’re all on dr*gs, there’s no way they can do this job sober.
Went to this one incall where she had a glass bong and a bottle of 1942 on the shelf. She was sober and coherent, had a great time. But to imply that their "body is a temple" otherwise, I don't buy it.
>I know they don’t actually find their clients attractive.
Heck, even I know I'm not attractive anymore, I hit the wall a long time ago. But I have a great personality (contrary to how I present myself on PERB), and if the provider I seek won't judge me too harshly, then we're all good.
>She charges X/hour, that means she must make YY per year
Not really my business to know, much less care about their gains. I mean, if she uses her gains to represent herself well, then my only judgement would be that she knows how to handle her business, and must be good at what she does to maintain her lifestyle.
>She for sure doesn’t pay taxes
Wouldn't care about this either way. Pay your taxes under the assumption the system works for you, or screw the government (especially with who our PM is) and keep all that under the table cash... That said, never understood why Escorts would pay taxes anyways? I mean, is it out of principle? Trying to legitimize the sex-trade in the eyes of the government, thinking they'll be taken more seriously? "Even though we do illegal and taboo things, we still pay our taxes, so listen to us!". Or out of fear of being audited if the taxman is curious about your luxurious lifestyle? Even certain providers moonlight from their regular job, so if that job keeps the rent and bills paid, so why report the extra cash?