Client's race
- Thread starter max999
- Start date
Really Ruffian
Ahhhh come on there are some cool east indians out there
Im not talking about the dippers dude
I hate dippers too
I no some cool east indian dudes out in my town that are first generation canadians and they are more canadian than anyone that i know
They are into heavy metal and cool old cars and harleys
all the good stuff bro..
you sound like a cool dude too
I love that dead jounal thing that rocks!!!!!
Ahhhh come on there are some cool east indians out there
Im not talking about the dippers dude
I hate dippers too
I no some cool east indian dudes out in my town that are first generation canadians and they are more canadian than anyone that i know
They are into heavy metal and cool old cars and harleys
all the good stuff bro..
you sound like a cool dude too
I love that dead jounal thing that rocks!!!!!
As I said, I found her very friendly and we had a good time. (her massage was good, but her finger tickles in sensitive spots was mindblowing!) It was one of the best SP encounters I've had - more PSE than GFE but very good.
Agree - she's a nice lady.
Agree - she's a nice lady.
I know one lady who specializes in "smaller "clientelle and so trys to avoid seeing "larger" men, eg black guys, she says she has to exercise to tighten back up afterward. she does tell men of every race if they are too big and asks them not to come back... nicely of course and after the call is done... a flattering way to be turned away?
Well, now that you mention it, I have heard that one before... gosh, shucks...I don't get the race thing, aren't we all Homo Sapiens? I mean we only emerged as a species 100-140,000 years ago so how could we have changed/evolved that much? We didn't even have an image of self until 50-70,000 years ago, so now we have taken that to the extreme of delineating tiny differences in our color and height and calling it race? I still don't get it but maybe someone with a scientific background can clear up a few things such as, are we that different or is it just skin?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Inquiring minds want to know.
I have made it a challenge to myself to see how many different visible races I can copulate with before I leave the planet. (female only! LOL)
the specification of race is just like when we classify a species.
Most critters in a group share a Genus but they are subclassified in species based on physical and genetic differences.
Humans are more different.
We all come from the genus and species Homo Sapiens but there is a subclassification of differences. All people come from one of 4 basic subtypes of homo sapiens: Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid and native americans (I forgot the actual scientific terms for the last one). Basically, we all derive from an ancestor that had either white, black, yellow or red skin and attributes linked to that subspecies.
These subtypes can be distinguished post mortem (when dead) via bone structure and genetic analysis.
That said, it is not incorrect to classify people by race because we are different enough that science already does so.
However, while species or subspecies may be different in a scientific classification scheme, because they share the same Genus, they can interbreed and thus create their own subspecies.
Similarly, humans do the same. Mixed race children often have a stronger combination of traits much like how a mixed breed dog is often genetically and physically stronger than the pure bred parents (pure breeding is actually bad in terms of genetic strength, check any science text on that one if you disagree).
So yes, we are different enough to be classified as race, but science aside, it is our ability to enjoy the properties of other races and interbreed that makes our offspring superior to the parents. However as humans, we can also be prejudicial and stick to races we like (ultimately to our detriment, strictly from a genetic pool strength perspective, so don't shoot me down with this one).
Ultimately, it is a waist of time to be prejudicial or to focus on labelling people bigots because this philosophical approach ultimately is not the best biological survival scheme for future children. Under Darwinian theory, those humans who are open to interbreeding among races stand the best chance of their progeny becoming stronger than the parents and this will insure that the parents genes will be continued to be passed on for years to come.
For those disbelievers, check the medical records. Humans are continually developing higher and higher incidence rates of what science classifies as weaker genes (eg. wearing glasses, diabetes, allergies, cancer and whole hosts of other genetic disorders or weaker attributes). This is the result of thousands of years of not interbreeding due to race and religious segregation.
My earlier point still stands. People are free to choose whoever they mate with (good or bad) and there are still tons of other mates of all kinds of races out there to choose from.
If someone turns you down, get over it and go to the next one!
Most critters in a group share a Genus but they are subclassified in species based on physical and genetic differences.
Humans are more different.
We all come from the genus and species Homo Sapiens but there is a subclassification of differences. All people come from one of 4 basic subtypes of homo sapiens: Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid and native americans (I forgot the actual scientific terms for the last one). Basically, we all derive from an ancestor that had either white, black, yellow or red skin and attributes linked to that subspecies.
These subtypes can be distinguished post mortem (when dead) via bone structure and genetic analysis.
That said, it is not incorrect to classify people by race because we are different enough that science already does so.
However, while species or subspecies may be different in a scientific classification scheme, because they share the same Genus, they can interbreed and thus create their own subspecies.
Similarly, humans do the same. Mixed race children often have a stronger combination of traits much like how a mixed breed dog is often genetically and physically stronger than the pure bred parents (pure breeding is actually bad in terms of genetic strength, check any science text on that one if you disagree).
So yes, we are different enough to be classified as race, but science aside, it is our ability to enjoy the properties of other races and interbreed that makes our offspring superior to the parents. However as humans, we can also be prejudicial and stick to races we like (ultimately to our detriment, strictly from a genetic pool strength perspective, so don't shoot me down with this one).
Ultimately, it is a waist of time to be prejudicial or to focus on labelling people bigots because this philosophical approach ultimately is not the best biological survival scheme for future children. Under Darwinian theory, those humans who are open to interbreeding among races stand the best chance of their progeny becoming stronger than the parents and this will insure that the parents genes will be continued to be passed on for years to come.
For those disbelievers, check the medical records. Humans are continually developing higher and higher incidence rates of what science classifies as weaker genes (eg. wearing glasses, diabetes, allergies, cancer and whole hosts of other genetic disorders or weaker attributes). This is the result of thousands of years of not interbreeding due to race and religious segregation.
My earlier point still stands. People are free to choose whoever they mate with (good or bad) and there are still tons of other mates of all kinds of races out there to choose from.
If someone turns you down, get over it and go to the next one!
D Duk the difference between you & I is....
You are in Deep Thought
and
I Thought I was in Deep
LOL
You are in Deep Thought
and
I Thought I was in Deep
LOL
Ladies and gentlemen of the board
Good day to you all.
It is with great pleasure that I announce to you my own take on the subject.
Its simple, concise, true, time tested; very few "regular" people would find any thing wrong with it.
"EAST OR WEST, SEX IS BEST
Good day to you all.
It is with great pleasure that I announce to you my own take on the subject.
Its simple, concise, true, time tested; very few "regular" people would find any thing wrong with it.
"EAST OR WEST, SEX IS BEST
Thanks D Duk, I had forgotten abot the 4 subtypes (is that the right word?).
That is fascinating about interbreeding (so to speak) making a stronger human being. I was of the impression that we were breeding ourselves to extinction with modern medicine preventing the culling of the herd as it does with animal species, survival of the fitest and all that. (Not any more.) But glad to hear it is balanced by something else!
A good example of the dangers of not inbreeding is the Dalmation, one of the weakest breeds genetically because of the need to keep the spots, that would be lost in a mixed breed.
That is fascinating about interbreeding (so to speak) making a stronger human being. I was of the impression that we were breeding ourselves to extinction with modern medicine preventing the culling of the herd as it does with animal species, survival of the fitest and all that. (Not any more.) But glad to hear it is balanced by something else!
A good example of the dangers of not inbreeding is the Dalmation, one of the weakest breeds genetically because of the need to keep the spots, that would be lost in a mixed breed.
You are almost right D Duk.
Of the four types you mentioned, you missed Australoid and you separated out native Americans which are Mongoloid. There are also a few groups which defy classification, Andaman Islanders and Anu (I think, small group that live on northern Japanese Islands). There are a few more which escape me right now.
As a matter of interest, New Ginea highland people are considered to be Australoid and are genetically distinct from the coastal lowlanders who are Mongoloid. Indians and Arabs are Caucasoid and the Indian sub-continent is most likely the origin of all Caucasion peoples
Fascinating subject this is, when I retire, I am ging to take some universty courses in the field.
rickoshadows
Of the four types you mentioned, you missed Australoid and you separated out native Americans which are Mongoloid. There are also a few groups which defy classification, Andaman Islanders and Anu (I think, small group that live on northern Japanese Islands). There are a few more which escape me right now.
As a matter of interest, New Ginea highland people are considered to be Australoid and are genetically distinct from the coastal lowlanders who are Mongoloid. Indians and Arabs are Caucasoid and the Indian sub-continent is most likely the origin of all Caucasion peoples
Fascinating subject this is, when I retire, I am ging to take some universty courses in the field.
rickoshadows
client's race
hi,
this is an interesting topic,but suffice to say that i am black,i have lived in canada for 37 years and consider myself 100% canuck! in my limited experience in this hobby i always tell the sp upfront of my race and i have no problems at all.i think it all comes down to treating others that way you want to be treated,grooming,being polite and keeping an open mind.did not mean to preach,thank you,map47
hi,
this is an interesting topic,but suffice to say that i am black,i have lived in canada for 37 years and consider myself 100% canuck! in my limited experience in this hobby i always tell the sp upfront of my race and i have no problems at all.i think it all comes down to treating others that way you want to be treated,grooming,being polite and keeping an open mind.did not mean to preach,thank you,map47
