Look, we're just playing semantics here.
Nothing wrong with CBJ is that's what an SP prefers to provide (and I've heard a few guys actually do prefer it....for safety, sensitivity.... or whatever reason).
But you can't call it GFE.
That term was invented to differentiate from "regular" service and implies a much more intimate experience. In my opinion, CBJ doesn't fit that branding.
So, an SP can choose to try and pass off CBJ service as "GFE" , but, UNLESS she's clear about it upfront, my guess is she'll run the risk of disappointing/misleading clients in the process - thereby damaging her own brand.
Far better to be clear and upfront - not confuse the two - so that what people buy matches their expectations.
Well said!
I personally wouldn't have a girl friend in my life that didn't deep french kiss me, or bbbj me with CIM.
So i long ago came to accept it as false advertising if they claim GFE but don't offer those services.
But hey, maybe some guy somewhere would allow a girl friend to not do those things.
In a perfect world all Service Providers would advertise in a simple and clear way.
The customers ( us pooners ) could expect all services unless they specifically advertised something as a restriction.
That would make it so much clearer and si.pler for everyone.
But the odds of the industry every accepting such a policy are basically zero. It is too logical and well conceived to become adopted as the rule of the industry.
I've found that many in this industry like chaos and games, not concise and clear rules. Maybe the top 10% of providers would like to have such a good policy in place. But the other 90% would never follow these rules. Heck many are so dishonest they use fake photos, lie about their age, and many more deceitful practices.
Again for the true professional providers like many on this review board, these comments are not directed at you. But more at the backpages scammer types, of which there are far too many of.
