LonelyGhost said:okay, I listed what i thought was wrong ...
tell me how he was 'great' for business.
really? at least i stick to the topic and not personal attacks.massageseeker said:Add: Lonley you only come on this board to argue anywayz ..
offering an opinion is suddenly an ignorant ranting???KingLeer said:ignorant rantings
thanks for the personal attack.wilde said:Take a long hard look at the Anaheim Ducks and compare the state of affairs before and after Brian Burke arrived. If you are still wondering why people regard him as one of the best GMs in the game today, then you are truly clueless.
.
I agree with you about Burkekehoe said:while he has the ability to be a class A asshole, no one can deny his business savvy and his knack for evaluating talent and acquiring the right players to make a successful team. He does however need to keep improving on his playoff record which, until this past year was piss poor. He is the perfect guy to bring in to right the ship and set it on the correct path of profitability and success in the standings as well as the community. Given the troubles on Long Island, I bet he could turn that mess around inside of three years.
Anyone who doesn't "like" Brian Burke is basing it mostly on his personality and dealings with the media. As a hockey man though, he's the best there is.
LonelyGhost said:thanks for the personal attack.
i didn't realize that asking questions of people who putatively
present themselves as knowledgable 'pros' on hockey is an
invitation to derogatory comments.
exactly what should i compare??? the signing of Rob Niedemeyer? "rumour"
has it that he didn't want to play in Van but wanted to play with his bros.,
so what does that have to do with Burke??? smart enough to sign a great player that wants to play for you?
fuck, even I'm smart enough to sign him up!
And how much better were the Ducks than the Nucks? Care to point me
at meaningful stats to compare? salary? points? points per salary dollar?
do we just compare the 'names'? how many games were won? how far they
went in the playoffs? teams they beat the nucks didn't beat? teams that beat them but not the nucks?
you're the flipping expert, you tell me what matters and I will go and look at it.
and meanwhile shove your personal attacks up your fucking stinking ass.
JackFrost said:Expect Cooke to be moved, for a defenseman..or perhaps even a top 6 forward
Another name to be moved, is Kesler.The Canucks have signed Chouinard,and Santala..two checking faceoff specialists. So, you either move Kesler to the wing, or trade him
Come on now. Bertuzzi was and is a joke and he should have been suspended indefinitely from all hockey for what he did on the ice.roadwarrior said:Burke didn't have Bertuzzi during that playoffs in which he was fired after. Granted it is hard to tell how much Bertuzzi could have helped them, since he seems to be inconsistent the last 3 years, however other teams still treat Bertuzzi with the utmost in defensive coverage, so he does free up his teammates.
Burke wore out his welcome with MacCammon.
I don't mind criticism as long as it is constructive: you've had amplewilde said:You can continue to think of yourself as Sam Pollock (which you are not) and make a complete ass of yourself by talking shit like trading unrestricted free agents. I for one, will not bother to comment anymore. Instead I'll just LMAO in private, how's that?
.
I was going to until I saw that stuff it up your stinking ass comment.LonelyGhost said:instead you continue to make snide comments and still can't back up
one thing that you have said to me, or point me in a direction where i
can read it for myself.