Ann Coulter with her pants down!

Previous Thread Next Thread
Restless

Restless

Tyrannosaurus Lix
Feb 9, 2004
212
12
18
Winnipeg
Here's a thought.

I don't give a flying F**k whether Americans, Europeans, Belgians, Kenyans, Australians, or anyone else, thinks we have our own culture and identity. I know we do. I know what being Canadian means and I'm proud to be one. I have no particular interest in explaining it to anyone who isn't interested in listening.

Most people from other countries, who have actually spent time here, love this country as well. Some don't. Because, you know what, were not perfect.

All this mud-slinging, back and forth between Americans and Canadians reminds me of a bunch of monkeys standing on 2 banks of a river, screaming and throwing pebbles at each other. No real reason, except "they are the other guys". Just proof that we've still got a lot of evolving to do.
 
G

Ghostwalker

Member
Aug 17, 2004
448
6
18
Lower Mainland
LonelyGhost said:
luckydog,George Bush is nothing but a charismatic dictator and you are no better than a brown shirt who believes ignorance is a virtue defensible by violence.

Don't dissagree with your general premise, but George Bush, charismatic???? You need to get out more....As an American conservative, and as a guy who misspent some of his lost youth in S.E Asia in the early 70's, I have nothing but contempt for a man who has become the political patron saint of mediocraty, stupidity and mendacity.... He is a guy who was born on third base, and everytime he hits a single....everybody thinks its a homerun...

Indeed, maybe if he had seen true action during his military service, he would be far less willing to squander American lives on a military campagne that makes the Viet Nam fiasco look positively brilliant.

The fact that Americans of any political persuasion could elect this dufus to the highest office in the country....is absolutely baffling and speaks volumes to the quality of canditate that the Democrats put forward...Gen Wes Clark or Senetor John McCain could had either of these signifcantly flawed candidates for breakfast either in the battlefield or the debating form....

These guys....both Bush and Kerry....make me ashamed to be American
Click to expand...
 
D

dirtydan

Banned
Oct 7, 2004
1,059
0
0
58
Herb_The_Perb said:
And don't forget William Shatner, Celine Dion, Art Linkletter, and Giselle McKenzie.

Oh, I forgot, we're talking about culture.
How about Glenn Gould, Mordecai Richler and Marshall McLuhan, then?
Better at what they did than anyone else in the world.

Yep, that's a lot more like it.
Click to expand...
Margaret Laurence, Oscar Peterson, The Guess Who, Stephen Leacock, The Group of Seven, Wayne & Shuster, Will Ferguson, Pierre Burton.
 
LonelyGhost

LonelyGhost

Telefunkin
Apr 26, 2004
3,935
0
0
Ghostwalker said:
LonelyGhost said:
luckydog,George Bush is nothing but a charismatic dictator and you are no better than a brown shirt who believes ignorance is a virtue defensible by violence.

Don't dissagree with your general premise, but George Bush, charismatic???? You need to get out more....
Click to expand...
Charismatic: adj 1. Spiritually endowed; divinely inspired. 2. Having the power to command.

and while 'charisma' is used to incorrectly denote a pleasant personality, it actually refers to "a unique personal power conceived of as belonging to exceptional individuals capable of securing the allegience of large numbers of people."

Hence: a charismatic leader.
Click to expand...
 
H

hooterman

why argue?

Not even worth it. Just back and forth with the same bullshit that America is so much better than Canada. I don't take cheap shots at the US to make myself feel better as a Canadian, so you Americans should keep your mouths shut too if all you're going to do is start a cross border argument. Be proud of your country, whether it be Canada or America, and leave it at that. No one is going to win this argument as it is a matter of personal pride and love for your country. We don't need to here the "my country is better than your country" crap because we all need each other in some way or another.
 
B

BillyC

New member
Feb 8, 2004
172
0
0
All about
Cheap Shots

Hooterman,

If you turn on your average American TV show you see that "taking cheap shots at others" is pretty much widely accepted as cool and proper etiquette nowadays! LOL

As for being proud of ones country and leave it at that... well, normally when one has to 'take shots' at others its BECAUSE one is not particularily proud of him/her self. Probably this 'nationalism' stuff is simply one symptom of a deeper problem becoming pervasive in society.

That all said, I agree... why argue, no one is getting anywhere.

BillyC
 
D

dittman

New member
Jan 22, 2003
730
0
0
75
seattle
actually sw and i agree on something, shock of shocks, a fighter plane would never be allowed to get that close to a carrier group besides the carrier group it also has awacs up aabove looking down and also a fighter cap that is usually out about 150 to 200 miles so no plane can get that close.
 
Maury Beniowski

Maury Beniowski

Blastocyst
Mar 31, 2004
1,869
1
0
In a nice wet pussy!
Actually, there is a way to settle this Americans vs. Canadians score...

But I fear we Canadians would not come out stronger than they are, because they have better steroids than we do, and they're experts at cheating!
 
Maury Beniowski

Maury Beniowski

Blastocyst
Mar 31, 2004
1,869
1
0
In a nice wet pussy!
That was Ben Johnson, he got caught. But Carl Lewis, who was awarded the gold didn't {get caught}, and is still snickering to this day, conspicuously shielded by America's Olympic Track & Field Association.


Carl getting spanked by Ben Johnson...

Wait, there's more!

Read This!
 
Last edited:
G

greenvalley

New member
Sep 19, 2004
110
0
0
Ben johnson was caught because his test was spiked.
Take a look at this. Particularly #4 Taken from http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,9080-826073,00.html
---------------------
Why does Johnson’s positive test for stanozolol not make sense?

1) Because stanozolol would not have helped to enhance performance. If anything, it would have hindered it. Stanozolol is a steroid that helps to build muscle; a cheat would use a steroid in the months pre-competition, never during competition. Johnson’s high level of stanozolol suggests that he took it in the immediate days before racing.

2) Because while Johnson’s entire camp later acknowledged that they were guilty of following a finely prescribed drugs programme, they said that it was furazobol they were on, not stanozolol.

3) Because even if, by some massive mistake, Johnson’s camp had been giving him stanozolol instead of furazobol as intended, they all say that Johnson had his last shot on August 28, 26 days before the final. It would have taken 14 days for it to clear his system.

4) Because later laboratory tests showed that the stanozolol in Johnson’s sample was pure. Stanozolol that has been ingested and urinated would be a broken-down version of the drug.
------------------
Ben Johnson wasn't caught previously because he was doing what everyone was doing, yes everyone even the USA, and knew how to beat the tests.

Here is another article showing info on your beloved Flo-Jo and many other big names. I just needed to see Flo-Jo's legs to know she was on something. Her legs would look perfect on a man but not possible on a woman that wasn't on something.

Quote From: http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/sport...ne=-Athletics--Drug-cheats-die-name_page.html
-----------------
But Flo-Jo had transformed her body in her mid-20s, and was later accused of using hGH. Her post-mortem showed some signs of excessive growth of her organs, including her heart, which contributed to her death which may have been a direct result of drug use.
--------------------------

The olympics has devolved into an arena of politics and my country is better than your country crap. So with that in mind lots of things are done in the name of national pride. I don't think there has been a clean sprinter in years same goes for lots of other sports. The people that get caught are the ones that don't have access to the right help in avoiding detection.
 
D

dirtydan

Banned
Oct 7, 2004
1,059
0
0
58
dittman said:
actually sw and i agree on something, shock of shocks, a fighter plane would never be allowed to get that close to a carrier group besides the carrier group it also has awacs up aabove looking down and also a fighter cap that is usually out about 150 to 200 miles so no plane can get that close.
Click to expand...
A carrier group has a layered defence involving aircraft and ships. Each group includes an AGEIS crusier or two supported by a few AEGIS destroyers and some destroyers or frigates for anti-submarine defence. The AEGIS in short a system where dozens and dozens of targets can only be tracked by these ships but also fired upon with guided missiles. With vertical launch containers rather than single or twin arm missile launchers more missiles can be quickly fired.

Then there is air cover, with the E-2 Hawkeye at the heart of it. With its powerful radar mounted ontop of the plane they too can track a great many targets that may be a threat to the carrier group.

For about 3 decades the F-14 Tomcat has been the air superiority fighter for the USN. Carriers used to have 2 squadrons on board, but now many have only 1. A Tomcat can use a variety of missiles from the short-range Sidewinder, the medium range Sparrow, and the long range Phoenix. And if need be there is the 20mm rototary cannon for close-in defence.

Replacing the Tomcat are newer versions of the Hornet, such as the F/A-18E. While these can't use the long range missiles like the Phoenix, they are very capable in air defence as well as attacking surface targets.

Should aircraft or anti-ship missile get passed all that there are the close-in defence systems on the carriers and its supporting ships.
 
T

timec98

Banned
Mar 5, 2005
84
0
0
Coulter's pissed at the cover pic --- she's whining about "thick ankles" or sumthin :D




.
 
B

burnabyguy5

Active member
Oct 31, 2002
126
94
28
Ann Coulter with her pants down?

When you say she has her pants down, I expect a little bit of ass and pussy.
How about a nude Ann Coulter, preferably with some rightwing asshole fucking her
 
T

timec98

Banned
Mar 5, 2005
84
0
0
Last edited:
luckydog71

luckydog71

Active member
Oct 26, 2003
1,117
0
36
75
Washington State
burnabyguy5 said:
..... How about a nude Ann Coulter, preferably with some rightwing asshole fucking her
Click to expand...
Timec I appreciate your endorsement. I was worried that burnabyguy would not believe me when I said I was the perfect "rightwing asshole" to lay the wood to ann. With your endorsement I am a shoe in.

BTW - I tried your link and it did not work for me, I do not have the right software to see it.
 
T

timec98

Banned
Mar 5, 2005
84
0
0
luckydog71 said:
Timec I appreciate your endorsement. I was worried that burnabyguy would not believe me when I said I was the perfect "rightwing asshole" to lay the wood to ann. With your endorsement I am a shoe in.

BTW - I tried your link and it did not work for me, I do not have the right software to see it.
Click to expand...
luckydog, ask and you shall receive --- I've edited the post to add another format for ya

.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Ashley Madison
Previous Thread Next Thread
Vancouver Escorts
Top Bottom