Had to start a new thread on this—the other got too messy, with all the moralizing.
Are Western erotic massage parlors morally superior to AMPs?
When I think of the teeming billions scraping along in abject squalor, I can't help thinking that Asian women getting to shag guys like me in Canadian AMPs, admittedly for a relative pittance, are the privileged ones. This is what they're used to doing; it's not backbreaking work or often even a healthy workout; and they all tell me they love to be busy—rather than sitting around all week waiting for a client.
Of course we'd all love to be able to do half the work for twice the pay—but much as I love sex, 45 minutes of it simply isn't worth much more to me (and many pooners) than $$ max. So I don't see that I would alleviate the economic lot of Asian SPs by not availing myself of their (often amazing) services. I poon in part to rid myself of the irrational shame and guilt instilled by my anti-sex upbringing, and I'll be damned if I let anyone inflict a moral guilt trip on me for frequenting AMPs.
Back to my original question: What keeps so many low-mileage Western-style MPs in business?
Personally I can see 5 types of pooners going to Western MPs:
1. Those (very few, I suspect) with irrational moral scruples about AMPs
2. Quite a few more with concerns about healthwise unsafe practices at AMPs
3. A lot of newbies and other naïve pooners who don’t know their options.
4. Rich guys (or wannabies) who just love the snob appeal of being with "elite companions"
5. When I recently discussed this with an Indo-Canadian friend, his answer was: “Ethnic men.”
He said, “For many Asian, African and South American man, entering a beautiful white woman’s body is a fantasy come true. It’s not mainly about good sex, it’s the fulfillment of a long-standing obsession—almost a kind of symbolic revenge for the colonialism, oppression, insecurity and inferiority feelings instilled in them by the dominance of the white race.”
Wow. That’s his opinion.
Whether he’s right or not, I say different strokes for different folks. If you want frenzied action with an Asian, go to one of the better AMPs (e.g. Prosper, Rainbow, Angel, Swan Lake). If you want a picture-perfect non-Asian—and don’t mind rather lame, clinical sex—go to a Western MP, like Swedish Touch, Spa Sensuous, BBC, Temptations, Great Pharaoh, Cloud 9 or L’Merage.
Another interesting question: Why the difference between Asian and Caucasian providers in (generalizing here) providing hot vs. lame sex?
Here’s what I’d guess is a key part of the explanation—disagree if you want.
Western women, raised in a culture that associates shame and guilt with sex (and especially non-monogamous sex), tend to consider access to their genitals to be a big deal that becomes morally charged. This leads to inhibitions and motivates attempts to make men jump through hoops.
Asian women are far more likely to see their genitals as just another useful body part for earning a living, by giving men a bit of euphoria and relaxation, that’s all. In fact, they often (seem to) allow themselves to get turned on too. And that kind of attitude helps put men at ease. It's a sense of a woman's pleasure and arousal that stimulates many men's arousal like nothing else—and the kind of restrictions and upselling going on at Western-style massage spas isn't conducive to maximum stimulation.
Just my humble point of view.
Are Western erotic massage parlors morally superior to AMPs?
One of the most sparkling intellects on PERB, Ms*Jewel is certainly entitled to her perspective—though I remain unconvinced that Western MPs (or classy indys like her) can claim the moral high ground. In my view, morality is about respecting people's real choices in the real world—not choices they would have made if poverty weren't rampant in Asia and elsewhere.No one is 'forcing' but everyone is cashing in on the fact that these girl's have limited other options. Plain and simple, we can debate it until we're all blue in the face and nothing will change this simple fact: this is to your advantage, not these girls and if they had a choice or other options they would, like the rest of other sp's, work 1/2 as much to end up with the same amount of money they need to send back to their families.
When I think of the teeming billions scraping along in abject squalor, I can't help thinking that Asian women getting to shag guys like me in Canadian AMPs, admittedly for a relative pittance, are the privileged ones. This is what they're used to doing; it's not backbreaking work or often even a healthy workout; and they all tell me they love to be busy—rather than sitting around all week waiting for a client.
Of course we'd all love to be able to do half the work for twice the pay—but much as I love sex, 45 minutes of it simply isn't worth much more to me (and many pooners) than $$ max. So I don't see that I would alleviate the economic lot of Asian SPs by not availing myself of their (often amazing) services. I poon in part to rid myself of the irrational shame and guilt instilled by my anti-sex upbringing, and I'll be damned if I let anyone inflict a moral guilt trip on me for frequenting AMPs.
Back to my original question: What keeps so many low-mileage Western-style MPs in business?
Personally I can see 5 types of pooners going to Western MPs:
1. Those (very few, I suspect) with irrational moral scruples about AMPs
2. Quite a few more with concerns about healthwise unsafe practices at AMPs
3. A lot of newbies and other naïve pooners who don’t know their options.
4. Rich guys (or wannabies) who just love the snob appeal of being with "elite companions"
5. When I recently discussed this with an Indo-Canadian friend, his answer was: “Ethnic men.”
He said, “For many Asian, African and South American man, entering a beautiful white woman’s body is a fantasy come true. It’s not mainly about good sex, it’s the fulfillment of a long-standing obsession—almost a kind of symbolic revenge for the colonialism, oppression, insecurity and inferiority feelings instilled in them by the dominance of the white race.”
Wow. That’s his opinion.
Whether he’s right or not, I say different strokes for different folks. If you want frenzied action with an Asian, go to one of the better AMPs (e.g. Prosper, Rainbow, Angel, Swan Lake). If you want a picture-perfect non-Asian—and don’t mind rather lame, clinical sex—go to a Western MP, like Swedish Touch, Spa Sensuous, BBC, Temptations, Great Pharaoh, Cloud 9 or L’Merage.
Another interesting question: Why the difference between Asian and Caucasian providers in (generalizing here) providing hot vs. lame sex?
Here’s what I’d guess is a key part of the explanation—disagree if you want.
Western women, raised in a culture that associates shame and guilt with sex (and especially non-monogamous sex), tend to consider access to their genitals to be a big deal that becomes morally charged. This leads to inhibitions and motivates attempts to make men jump through hoops.
Asian women are far more likely to see their genitals as just another useful body part for earning a living, by giving men a bit of euphoria and relaxation, that’s all. In fact, they often (seem to) allow themselves to get turned on too. And that kind of attitude helps put men at ease. It's a sense of a woman's pleasure and arousal that stimulates many men's arousal like nothing else—and the kind of restrictions and upselling going on at Western-style massage spas isn't conducive to maximum stimulation.
Just my humble point of view.