A controversial decision...

[DominaPandora]

Very well written, submissive one and very good points.

I fail to understand why a Domme taking a boyfriend, lover or husband is often considered controversial as well. We are all human and seeking to fulfill our needs and wants. A Domme is no less Domme for offering FS because she is single and horny, for taking a lover/boyfriend husband to fulfill other needs/ wants/ goals or for dressing in silk as opposed to leather.

A Domme is a Domme regardless, it's an integral part of who we are inside.

We tend to rush to judgement too quickly. Again, very well written.

 

[jeffrey_fortin]

A Domme is a Domme

The definition of a Domme is : a person who has control and take her pleasure the way She wants right ?

if her pleasure is to get pee on why not ? is it less dominating ? I dont think so because its always the Domme pleasure and the spirit of getting it is there

Also the subject of getting an FS during a session should not be a problem as its also a pleasure that the Domme wants.....yes I know you will say : Pro-Domme doesnt do sex and if they do they become an SP.....I dont think so

BDSM is a world that include everything possible and I mean everything, its onlye the limits of the person who practice it that delimit the limits, so if a Domme wants to fuck her slave, then She do it and it is not less Domme doing it

BDSM should be pleasure at first, its my way of seeing it since I am into it

Have fun

Jeffrey

 

[Hoosier Daddy]

Quite simple in my books. It's her game, she sets the rules, we choose to play.

 

[visiting]

LOL

OK let me get this straight....

Who's complaining about Miss T's menu? Not Me!!


I like Miss T, I come by the BSDM section just to see her posts,..... ok ok and pictures of her and her evil friends..... like Miss Jasmine, Nina, and Anna.... etc etc etc OOOO la la!


But I still can't figure out who is complaining? I tend to find people like to complain a lot on these boards, but yet, if there not going to use the services why bother to complain?

 

[jeffrey_fortin]

by the way

ohhh by the way

you know why does most Pro-Domme dont accept sex into their list....its because its suppose to be illegal doing it ....hahahaha what an hypocrisy

They wont do it because they say : ohhhh you know its prostitution to do that....sorry but prostitution in Canada is legal, its the solicitation that is illegal and once again you can turn it into a legal service if you offer it as a service ...or you get money as a gift, but thats not illegal for criminal activity but it might be an illegal profit for Revenue Canada, but thats another story hehehe

So when I see a pro that act like this, its a lie for me pure and simple ))))

 

[trackstar]

ohhh by the way

you know why does most Pro-Domme dont accept sex into their list....its because its suppose to be illegal doing it ....hahahaha what an hypocrisy

They wont do it because they say : ohhhh you know its prostitution to do that....sorry but prostitution in Canada is legal, its the solicitation that is illegal and once again you can turn it into a legal service if you offer it as a service ...or you get money as a gift, but thats not illegal for criminal activity but it might be an illegal profit for Revenue Canada, but thats another story hehehe

So when I see a pro that act like this, its a lie for me pure and simple ))))

Is it just me, or is nothing about that post simple???

 

[Robertdice]

I admit it, the high rate is kind of a way to deter the undesirable, disrespectful cheapskates. So far so good I guess. I'm only looking for 'A Few Good Men'

So men without money are undesirable, disrespectful cheapskates and those with money aren’t? Wow, I feel some back peddling coming.

 

[Aeiyah]

*Le Yawn*

So men without money are undesirable, disrespectful cheapskates and those with money aren’t? Wow, I feel some back peddling coming.

Someone earlier described anyone daring to question Miss T as "slinging mud".

Now we see who the real mud slinger is. Don't wanna pay $750 for a session? Then you're an "undesirable and disrespectful cheapskate".

Nice.

The discussions about rates has been beaten to death, both here and out there in the world in which a lot of us pooners earn our dollars. The only undesireables are those who complain about the rates.

Now be good little boys and go back to your sandbox and play nicely.

 

[Goldenrod]

The discussions about rates has been beaten to death, both here and out there in the world in which a lot of us pooners earn our dollars. The only undesireables are those who complain about the rates.

Now be good little boys and go back to your sandbox and play nicely.

I don't think anyone is saying she shouldn't charge what she desires but the argument is here concerning her wording. Not something us losers have read into her words, but words she wrote.

She essentially labels anyone who CAN'T or WON'T pay the $750 as 'undesireable' and 'disrespectful' and to me, that's fucking rude. If you don't want to pay 750 big ones to fuck an SP it certainly doesn't make you 'disrespectful' it makes you sensible

And it makes her unattractive and arrogant.

 

[billstar606]

RE: A controversial decision

Interesting discussion. I agree with Miss T about it being her decision. If i see a SP and we agree to do something and it isn't done that is one thing; if i agree to have her in control within the limits that are set that is what i should get her decision. Whether the session progresses to some release or not is her control.

On another post i saw where someone took care of themselves before they saw the domme. this could be for various reasons; either not wanting to have an "accident" too quickly, or knowing that the play goes longer untill there is. i remember doing that with a regular domme i saw, a couple times and the domme requireing a release before i got to go. i was tender when it was done.

i remember hinting a bit tooo hard about my desire, wish and want to have release during the session. she teased during the session and then had me get dressed. As i was about to head out the door to the waiting taxi, she stroked the front of my slacks until release. I was sent out the door to my awaiting cab and a trip to the airport. i have related that story to others and that said that was wrong and cruel; but believe me that relationship became one of real control. It is the think that many submissives seek and find it difficult to develop over a single session.

So if we decide what is going to happen..i think that should happen. if we decide to have someone else in control..then within the limits set it is their choice. if we develop the chemistry with enough trust that we give up total control then ..i guess be careful what we ask for.


On the longer sessions i think it is a great idea. I have never met Ms. T but she seems to have great energy and i would imagine has the ability to go the three hours. but as someone that advocates longer sessions, i find that many lack the repertoire to go that long. On the other hand i know i lack the stamina to keep going that long; so it does become a tradeoff of the incremental experience.

but can you really have a tease and denial session in one hour? so i think if the effort is there. and the clock isn't the issue; spending 750 for an afternoon, morning or eve is appropriate. i guess the bigger quiestion is should it 1500 for two for that period and is there incrementaal gain there?

enjoy the conversation

bill

 

[SlimShady]

So does this mean I can now get a HJ in a session?

 

[trackstar]

So does this mean I can now get a HJ in a session?

I don't think you can, no. Everyone else can, but sorry, we're going to have to turn you away at this time. Sorry, but thanks for coming.

 

[SlimShady]

we're going to have to turn you away at this time.

We're??

You mean you give guys HJ's too?

 

[Goldenrod]

We're??

You mean you give guys HJ's too?

Does that make you uncomfortable or excited?

 

[Aeiyah]

Thanks for Sharing

i remember hinting a bit tooo hard about my desire, wish and want to have release during the session. she teased during the session and then had me get dressed. As i was about to head out the door to the waiting taxi, she stroked the front of my slacks until release. I was sent out the door to my awaiting cab and a trip to the airport. i have related that story to others and that said that was wrong and cruel; but believe me that relationship became one of real control. It is the think that many submissives seek and find it difficult to develop over a single session.

So if we decide what is going to happen..i think that should happen. if we decide to have someone else in control..then within the limits set it is their choice. if we develop the chemistry with enough trust that we give up total control then ..i guess be careful what we ask for.

On the longer sessions i think it is a great idea. I have never met Ms. T but she seems to have great energy and i would imagine has the ability to go the three hours. but as someone that advocates longer sessions, i find that many lack the repertoire to go that long. On the other hand i know i lack the stamina to keep going that long; so it does become a tradeoff of the incremental experience.

but can you really have a tease and denial session in one hour? so i think if the effort is there. and the clock isn't the issue; spending 750 for an afternoon, morning or eve is appropriate. i guess the bigger quiestion is should it 1500 for two for that period and is there incrementaal gain there?

enjoy the conversation

bill

An hour, or even half an hour, can be more than long enough. Of course being a regular with Miss T makes it possible to reach an intensity level that makes it possible.

 

[trackstar]

We're??

You mean you give guys HJ's too?

Of course it does. Just close your eyes and ignore the stapler in my other hand

 

[SlimShady]

Of course it does. Just close your eyes and ignore the stapler in my other hand