A controversial decision...
- Thread starter Small pleasures
- Start date
That's EXACTLY it! I guess I can stop writing this note now, cuz the secret is out.
bahh lol
My particular point re: the review was simply to emphasize that the rate requested was the rate paid. Since it was the rate itself that was questioned.
Miss T already has a history, rep, as does the reviewer. Since perb allows sps to be DNR'd and this service is new for Miss T, then it's just common sense that he find out if he can post it or not. Lot of writing down the drain if she can have it pulled, after all.
And like most smart cookies, she's going to read a potential client's posting history (if he's not already seen her before) before agreeing to book an appt with him. Most selective sps screen potential clients in some way, no one wants a mutually bad experience. Those worried too much about "getting the most bang for the buck" are never going to be preferred customers, whether they charge 100/hr or 500.
My particular point re: the review was simply to emphasize that the rate requested was the rate paid. Since it was the rate itself that was questioned.
Miss T already has a history, rep, as does the reviewer. Since perb allows sps to be DNR'd and this service is new for Miss T, then it's just common sense that he find out if he can post it or not. Lot of writing down the drain if she can have it pulled, after all.
And like most smart cookies, she's going to read a potential client's posting history (if he's not already seen her before) before agreeing to book an appt with him. Most selective sps screen potential clients in some way, no one wants a mutually bad experience. Those worried too much about "getting the most bang for the buck" are never going to be preferred customers, whether they charge 100/hr or 500.
Good for you get that $$$$!
Now if you could just run Miss. Jasmine on to this side of the fence I could put my $$$ in her hands.
Now if you could just run Miss. Jasmine on to this side of the fence I could put my $$$ in her hands.
Interlude
Perhaps a brief limerick before the tension resumes...
...there once was a mistress from Vancouver
who wanted a little more from her pooners
she raised up rates
which pissed off ingrates
But she got what she wanted and came sooner...
OK, you can now return to the previously scheduled banter.
Perhaps a brief limerick before the tension resumes...
...there once was a mistress from Vancouver
who wanted a little more from her pooners
she raised up rates
which pissed off ingrates
But she got what she wanted and came sooner...
OK, you can now return to the previously scheduled banter.
Hookers with whips have been around longer than Pro-Doms have - we judge based on what we deem to be wrong, which doesn't always add up to right. To many times I've heard kinksters say, "his kink isn't really kink" or .... or ... lol ... PLEASE give me a break !!
Being in the kink world for the better part of 12 years, I've seen it all. Unfortunately I some how knew Ms.T. would come over to this hooker side.
So reluctantly I say "Welcome"
Yeah, I know ya don't give a rats ass about my opinion. But you've obviously not scoped out the competition b4 posting your rates. More power to ya if ya get it.Small pleasure said:
I don't doubt that she did scope out rates. Took me 2 minutes to find similar donations:Yeah, I know ya don't give a rats ass about my opinion. But you've obviously not scoped out the competition b4 posting your rates. More power to ya if ya get it.
Classy Angel - 750/2hr
Nikki Amore - 400/hr
Exclusive Foxes - 1200/3hr
GFE Foxes - 600/2hr
Vanesssa - 350/hr, 600/2hr
Just examples, keep in mind a couple of the ladies are relatively new. Miss T is not, and therefor should be setting higher rates considering. (Not trying to single anybody out here, but anyone who reads ads or reviews knows these rates are common.)
Personally I couldn't care less. I just thought it was funny as hell. She contacted this guy all confident that he would just welcome her with open arms. When the dude freaked on her, her face was priceless!
smack that
am i missing something or is she saying ... for $750 for 2 hours ... we can smack that ... but not anal. not from the top.
hmmm ....
perhaps its all the mud slinging .. but i'd like to get back to the topic of
pleasure
am i missing something or is she saying ... for $750 for 2 hours ... we can smack that ... but not anal. not from the top.
hmmm ....
perhaps its all the mud slinging .. but i'd like to get back to the topic of
pleasure
Interesting thread
I haven't posted in quite some time, but this debate interested me on 2 fronts.
1. The "hooker with whip" vs. pure "Pro-Domme" issue. Played with a fair # of both over the years. Both have their virtues. But I must say, I actually favour "hookers with whips" because, if they are at all serious, once they've gained some experience, as a client there is little to no difference in the domme part, but now you've got the "bonus" of FS. Plus, I've never quite fathomed why a true Domme wouldn't want to truly "use" her sub. Whether it's acting or not, it's an extra thrill for me to feel like my top wants to use me.
2. AS for the price, especially given that dom is still on the menu. not out of range at all, and as Ms. T wisely divined (pun intended) it keeps the trash away. Pooning is like golf - if you can't afford to pay, you can't afford to play...
I haven't posted in quite some time, but this debate interested me on 2 fronts.
1. The "hooker with whip" vs. pure "Pro-Domme" issue. Played with a fair # of both over the years. Both have their virtues. But I must say, I actually favour "hookers with whips" because, if they are at all serious, once they've gained some experience, as a client there is little to no difference in the domme part, but now you've got the "bonus" of FS. Plus, I've never quite fathomed why a true Domme wouldn't want to truly "use" her sub. Whether it's acting or not, it's an extra thrill for me to feel like my top wants to use me.
2. AS for the price, especially given that dom is still on the menu. not out of range at all, and as Ms. T wisely divined (pun intended) it keeps the trash away. Pooning is like golf - if you can't afford to pay, you can't afford to play...
Controversial - NOT!
Actually I do not find Ms. T's decision controversial at all. She is a wonderful free spirit and can decide what she wants to put on the menu and what she wants to charge for it.
Petty comparisons to other SP's prices disregard that there are market makers like Rolex, Ferrari, Chanel, etc., who are extremely successful charging stratoshpheric prices. Then there are the market takers who eek out whatever table scraps are left over in the heathen wasteland of mediocrity. There are plenty of knock-offs out there. If you like shopping at Wallmart, you can get some great bargains. But let's face it, blue vests just aren't sexy if what you really want to do is fuck a domme, once in your life, before you die and your brain comes tumbling down your snout.
This subject is more intriguing than controversial IMHO. The only controversy here seems to be a few small minds that that contribute nothing of substance and denegrate an otherwise insightful topic into self-serving niggle-picking negativity. If you are one of those slow developing souls that consistently project bad energy into the world, rest assured it will only be a matter of time before Karma catches up to you. Life tends to come full circle that way. It's easy to be all blustery and self-righteous here on PERB, but then in the lonely starkness of your cold bedsheets at midnight, this is when karma bites you in the butt and makes you realize you are alone, unfulfilled, and bitter as a result of your own attitudes.
But let is get back to controversial decisions... I can understand why tying up miss T, pissing on her, and dominating her is off the menu. Not that it wouldn't be fun, but she is a domme after all. However, I do have to admit that Ms. T's ass appears extremely spankable, so I am not quite sure why that bit is off the menu. Herein lies the controversy in Punt's opinion. Honestly, wouldn't you like to smack that ass? I know I would. What if a client was ordered to smack her ass? That might make it OK. Probably won't happen, but this would be a worthy controversy for the thread.
So Please. Let's get over the price wanking and celebrate some good BDSM forum discussion about smacking asses, kissing dommes, and the endorphin rush of forbidden penetration.
Y-U-M-M.
Actually I do not find Ms. T's decision controversial at all. She is a wonderful free spirit and can decide what she wants to put on the menu and what she wants to charge for it.
Petty comparisons to other SP's prices disregard that there are market makers like Rolex, Ferrari, Chanel, etc., who are extremely successful charging stratoshpheric prices. Then there are the market takers who eek out whatever table scraps are left over in the heathen wasteland of mediocrity. There are plenty of knock-offs out there. If you like shopping at Wallmart, you can get some great bargains. But let's face it, blue vests just aren't sexy if what you really want to do is fuck a domme, once in your life, before you die and your brain comes tumbling down your snout.
This subject is more intriguing than controversial IMHO. The only controversy here seems to be a few small minds that that contribute nothing of substance and denegrate an otherwise insightful topic into self-serving niggle-picking negativity. If you are one of those slow developing souls that consistently project bad energy into the world, rest assured it will only be a matter of time before Karma catches up to you. Life tends to come full circle that way. It's easy to be all blustery and self-righteous here on PERB, but then in the lonely starkness of your cold bedsheets at midnight, this is when karma bites you in the butt and makes you realize you are alone, unfulfilled, and bitter as a result of your own attitudes.
But let is get back to controversial decisions... I can understand why tying up miss T, pissing on her, and dominating her is off the menu. Not that it wouldn't be fun, but she is a domme after all. However, I do have to admit that Ms. T's ass appears extremely spankable, so I am not quite sure why that bit is off the menu. Herein lies the controversy in Punt's opinion. Honestly, wouldn't you like to smack that ass? I know I would. What if a client was ordered to smack her ass? That might make it OK. Probably won't happen, but this would be a worthy controversy for the thread.
So Please. Let's get over the price wanking and celebrate some good BDSM forum discussion about smacking asses, kissing dommes, and the endorphin rush of forbidden penetration.
Y-U-M-M.
blush P.S. you have a very spankable tooshie there to Beautiful Anna! Not that I was peeking or anything. Grinz.
Double standard
We are available for duo's. I will adjust my rate to make a duo do-able with most SP's. I LOVE women. Purrrr.
Okay, I have a bit of a double standard. Men are not allowed to spank me, slap or smack my ass...but Anna can. Not too hard, but c'mon, it's Anna. If she asked me to walk across hot coals to get a little luvin' from her I probably couldn't rip my stiletto's off fast enough.
We are available for duo's. I will adjust my rate to make a duo do-able with most SP's. I LOVE women. Purrrr.
youre on to me ...
Im glad to see that others are coming around to my way of thinking.
Please feel free to call for any referal info regarding new clients, Miss T.
I like your no bs approach with announcing your menu changes.
If there are those who disagree with what youre doing...
...so be it.
You, and you alone must dictate what is giving you pleasure in your life.
That is my opinion.
Ill back you up 100%.
Respectfully,
xoxox,
jxxx
Im glad to see that others are coming around to my way of thinking.
Please feel free to call for any referal info regarding new clients, Miss T.
I like your no bs approach with announcing your menu changes.
If there are those who disagree with what youre doing...
...so be it.
You, and you alone must dictate what is giving you pleasure in your life.
That is my opinion.
Ill back you up 100%.
Respectfully,
xoxox,
jxxx
This is an interesting subject.
Many people misunderstand the "escort with a whip" reference and what it means.
A domme who offers FS is just that, a Domme who chooses to use her subs/slaves/etc... in this manner. A domme who does not is simply a Domme who takes that enjoyment by other means.
An escort with a whip is entirely different, they are not a Domme but an escort who provides fetish services. There's nothing wrong with that either, there's a market for everything. The reference comes down to the touchy area, which is when these escorts call themselves Domme simply because they have a whip. They usually have little to no understanding of the fetishes and are many times, dangerous. If you don't know about where and how to hit, don't understand the fetishes and just do it because you think it will make you extra cash....you can be dangerous to those who see you and in the end provide an incorrect view of what a Domme is to those who don't know better / to the public. It is this group that most Dommes have no wish to be lumped in with / confused with. It's all about knowing what you are doing and truly enjoying it.
I've never understood the tendency to lump anyone who offers FS into this category. And, for the record, Dommes have been around forever though I doubt anyone could honestly state which came first....the escort with a whip or the Domme. That's kind of like the chicken and the egg debate. In fact, the dungeons of old in the castles.... mmm... one must think that some at least held truly sadistic keepers, truly dominant people who loved their work. mmm... sorry, got pulled off into dreamland there, what a delightful thought.
Now, I don't know Miss T beyond her posts and pictures here. As such, I wouldn't consider myself qualified to judge where she fits. I do doubt, from what I've read, that she would fit "escort with a whip".
We are all different, that provides variety which is the spice of life. We are all unique and seeing each of us is a very different experience, I'm sure. I don't see the problem here.
Many people misunderstand the "escort with a whip" reference and what it means.
A domme who offers FS is just that, a Domme who chooses to use her subs/slaves/etc... in this manner. A domme who does not is simply a Domme who takes that enjoyment by other means.
An escort with a whip is entirely different, they are not a Domme but an escort who provides fetish services. There's nothing wrong with that either, there's a market for everything. The reference comes down to the touchy area, which is when these escorts call themselves Domme simply because they have a whip. They usually have little to no understanding of the fetishes and are many times, dangerous. If you don't know about where and how to hit, don't understand the fetishes and just do it because you think it will make you extra cash....you can be dangerous to those who see you and in the end provide an incorrect view of what a Domme is to those who don't know better / to the public. It is this group that most Dommes have no wish to be lumped in with / confused with. It's all about knowing what you are doing and truly enjoying it.
I've never understood the tendency to lump anyone who offers FS into this category. And, for the record, Dommes have been around forever though I doubt anyone could honestly state which came first....the escort with a whip or the Domme. That's kind of like the chicken and the egg debate. In fact, the dungeons of old in the castles.... mmm... one must think that some at least held truly sadistic keepers, truly dominant people who loved their work. mmm... sorry, got pulled off into dreamland there, what a delightful thought.
Now, I don't know Miss T beyond her posts and pictures here. As such, I wouldn't consider myself qualified to judge where she fits. I do doubt, from what I've read, that she would fit "escort with a whip".
We are all different, that provides variety which is the spice of life. We are all unique and seeing each of us is a very different experience, I'm sure. I don't see the problem here.
Last edited:
Those are excellent observations and points DominaPandora and i can offer proof of that. i have either served or befriended many dominas in Vancouver over the past 10 years, and all but a couple took on clients as either slave/lovers or just plain lovers/boyfriends. Some have probably even married them by now or have in the past. That is probably even more controversial than declaring being an outright SP, which is as clear as can be. It could even be said that MissT is being clearer about it than the others were or are currently being, especially if they are complaining about it. They should probably wake up this morning and see who it is in bed with them before making any judgments.
Regards,
submissive_one
Regards,
submissive_one
