… one thing I don’t agree is China attacking Taiwan. Ain’t happening. China for the longest time has not attack or invade any country and it’s not about to do so. It has already established itself as a global leader and a grownup. See, this is the talking point of the US brainwashing everyone in the region into believing that they need the US to be there. Just like creating this fear all over the world that they the US needs to be there for them. That they needed to spend like 2% to 5% of their gdp on defense which translate to buying arms from them. It’s a business plain and simple. China and Taiwan will one day unify with not a single bullet fired. It’s just a matter of time.Lets see a synopsis of Trumps Failings
Tarif's instated against all his allies and China, India (I say mate that fellow batting 1000 for pissing off everybody)
Threatened to make Canada 51 state.
Threatened to invade Greenland.
Pressured by Israel to bomb Iran 2025.
Epstein Files came out redacted and saved the public to know who in America is being used by foreign operatives.
Bombed Iran, declared "a Short and Victorious War". Started a war with Iraq, put the US that the US cannot sustain because they would have a shortage of missiles for all the US fleet should China attack Taiwan.
The Straight of Hormuz was closed by Iran, Oil tankers can't get by, World Price of Oil goes up (proof that Trump is actually trying to help Putin by raises oil prices).
Trump sues the Treasury/IRS for 10 billion, now he is in a ethical dilimna as he started the lawsuit and he is the head of the Executive branch which he runs and is now getting sued by himself. This is a case of conflict of interest. The courts don't like the lawsuit, Trump decides to engage in what he is know for best the art of the deal.... in which he will get immunity from IRS audits and have a 1.776 Billion slush fund to pay off his supporters for the next election....
So what kind of hot water is Trump going to jump into next....
Already happening with many manufacturers.China and Taiwan will one day unify
Yes, China has already created an image that they are more mature and trustworthy than the US. More and more countries are now moving towards China for trade and even defence.Already happening with many manufacturers.
Much prefabrication in China and finish work in Taiwan.
Producers do this so they can avoid duties in western import countries by claiming Made in Taiwan instead of Made in China.
As long as more value is added in Taiwan it’s allowed under trade rules.
China never wanted the territory, China wanted the lucrative manufacturing capacity. But now that China itself has developed its own sector this is less important.
The US media make a lot of noise about shoddy Chinese weaponry. But most US tech is dependent on Chinese tooling ie Leitz CCMs etc.
Nope you’re on “sane person looking at reality pills” The crazy pills are in the Cool Aid the MAGA crowd have been guzzling for the past 10 years.I’ve abstained from talking politics on this site but the orange fucktard is trying to raise the age of the draft he’s pushing through to age 40 .
WTF ! ?
Plus they are predicting a return of the Great Depression ( literally ) in that most of us will be semi starving due to 80% of food becoming out of 80% of the populations price range.
On top of that this moron still controls most of the idiotic voting population.
What the Fuck ?
Am I the only one who feels like I’m on crazy pills ?
You need to read between the lines, just because there was no formal declaration of war, Chinese troops don't go lollipoping about a border and set up new gates in another country or make aggressive plane maneuvers or ships attempted land ....… one thing I don’t agree is China attacking Taiwan. Ain’t happening. China for the longest time has not attack or invade any country and it’s not about to do so. It has already established itself as a global leader and a grownup. See, this is the talking point of the US brainwashing everyone in the region into believing that they need the US to be there. Just like creating this fear all over the world that they the US needs to be there for them. That they needed to spend like 2% to 5% of their gdp on defense which translate to buying arms from them. It’s a business plain and simple. China and Taiwan will one day unify with not a single bullet fired. It’s just a matter of time.
The great depression started with the stock market crash... But what really accelerated it was drought for the south western farms. this was before well pumps to pump water from aquifiers. A major contribution to this drought was the large cutting of trees across the American mid-west , where winds picked up dry dusty soils and stripped the land of topsoil for growing crops. A line of trees north to south were replanted and that created a 100 mile wide (east to west) barrier to stop the wind and soil erosion.I’ve abstained from talking politics on this site but the orange fucktard is trying to raise the age of the draft he’s pushing through to age 40 .
WTF ! ?
Plus they are predicting a return of the Great Depression ( literally ) in that most of us will be semi starving due to 80% of food becoming out of 80% of the populations price range.
On top of that this moron still controls most of the idiotic voting population.
What the Fuck ?
Am I the only one who feels like I’m on crazy pills ?
The funny thing why its diesel.... Is instead of making a River-Canal system in the prairies the politicians chose the cheapest solution , not a long term more efficient system of waterways (boats). Since the 1960s grain elevators and railroads that went to almost every town in the prairies, were being abandoned. It was cheaper for the big buyers to let elevators die, and let the farmers truck grain to a bigger elevator located in a bigger town.Food has to be transported everywhere, and that needs diesel fuel.
The jump in diesel prices is a big factor in food price increases.
Getting rid of all the migrant farm labor will reduce the food supply, this will affect Canadians as well. Tighter supply=higher prices.
Daily dosage of Crazy pills or we have been inserted into a Twilight Zone/Matrix show without our knowledge where logic means nothing to 35% of The American people and still 15% of Canadians .I’ve abstained from talking politics on this site but the orange fucktard is trying to raise the age of the draft he’s pushing through to age 40 .
WTF ! ?
Plus they are predicting a return of the Great Depression ( literally ) in that most of us will be semi starving due to 80% of food becoming out of 80% of the populations price range.
On top of that this moron still controls most of the idiotic voting population.
What the Fuck ?
Am I the only one who feels like I’m on crazy pills ?
I did a little research and this is what I found:You need to read between the lines, just because there was no formal declaration of war, Chinese troops don't go lollipoping about a border and set up new gates in another country or make aggressive plane maneuvers or ships attempted land ....
Battle of Chamdo (1950) ------Annexation of Tibet.
- Second Taiwan Strait Crisis (1958)
- Battle of the Paracel Islands (1974)
- Johnson South Reef Skirmish (1988)
- Third Taiwan Strait Crisis (1995)
- Scarborough Shoal standoff (2012)
- 2020–2021 China–India skirmishes
- 2022 Yangtse clash
- Fourth Taiwan Strait Crisis
Land skirmishes with India.
Also a impact on wars in Indochina (Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam)
China's Action in the South China Sea, setting up missile platforms on sandbars to claim resources in the Spratley Islands which are closer to the Philippines and Malaysia then mainland China. Their aggressive ramming tactics against other countries flags vessels in the South China Sea. They have an aggressive posture with all their neighbours including India, Russia and Vietnam. In 1950 they took over Tibet (prob the most peace loving nation due to Buddhism)....
Since the early 2000s China has built a bigger fleet then the USA and has built a war machine. Germany did the same arms build up when Hitler came to power, he turned Germany into an arms factory (They were not building luxury goods at the time for Germany).
And publicly Xi has told the world press that Taiwan is the property of China.
The defense of Taiwan will be difficult as the majority of people live on the northern side of the Island. This is where the Chinese will land. Drones and railguns would be a good defense against the thousands of ships the Chinese will use. The Chinese will use drones ships to get massive swarms of drones to knock out any land artillery, and missile site on Taiwan... Not too long ago in China, every boat being constructed had to be constructed to military standards. Now every Chinese flag bearing ship could be a potential threat to a US destroyer if it comes close enough to put drones in the air.
In the past the US has stuck up for Taiwan, when China flexes its muscles.... In the last few years China has been operating massive ship maneuvers just outside territorial waters (12 mile limit). Now Trump went to China and really got nothing, while the US is still deleting its stockpile of missiles, which is being wasted in the St. of Hormuz.....
The people of Taiwan don't want Mainland communist China to rule them, prime example look at Hong Kong when the English lease ran up, not at first, but grips on the police were tightened, elected officials were forced out, and puppets put into place.
The Chinese are just biding their time, So everything is in its favour to launch a surprise and sustained attack.
That is military speculation, not established fact.“The Chinese will land on the northern side…”
My left field theory about China’s ambitions in the long run is that Russia is a far more attractive and necessary territory than any other.I did a little research and this is what I found:
Your description of “ramming tactics” and coercive maritime behavior is broadly supported by reporting from multiple governments and international observers.
Taiwan: Xi Jinping’s statements
Correct. Xi Jinping has repeatedly stated that Taiwan is part of China and that “reunification” is a goal. China has not ruled out the use of force.
However:
Hong Kong comparison: partially accurate but simplified
- Beijing officially still says it prefers “peaceful reunification.”
- Whether China intends to invade soon is debated among analysts.
Your point about Hong Kong reflects real developments:
So concerns in Taiwan about losing political freedoms under Beijing are very real and widely documented.
- after the 2019 protests, Beijing imposed the National Security Law,
- opposition politicians and activists were arrested or disqualified,
- electoral rules were changed to ensure “patriots” govern Hong Kong.
But calling all current officials “puppets” is more political characterization than objective fact.
“China has built a bigger fleet than the USA”: needs clarification
This is one of the most important nuances.
By number of ships, China’s navy is now larger than the U.S. Navy. This is widely acknowledged, including by the U.S. Department of Defense.
However:
So “bigger fleet” is true numerically, but it does not automatically mean militarily superior overall.
- the U.S. Navy still has major advantages in:
- aircraft carriers,
- nuclear submarines,
- global logistics,
- combat experience,
- tonnage,
- power projection.
“China turned into an arms factory like Nazi Germany”: partially true analogy, but limited
China has massively expanded:
And China’s civilian shipbuilding industry is indeed closely linked to military capability.
- shipbuilding,
- missile production,
- drones,
- naval modernization,
- industrial capacity.
But comparisons to Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany should be made carefully:
Analogy can help illustrate concerns, but it can also oversimplify important differences.
- Germany under Hitler explicitly pursued rapid territorial conquest and world war.
- China is certainly more assertive and militarily expansionist in some regions, but its behavior and global strategy are not identical to Nazi Germany’s ideology or conduct.
“Every Chinese ship built to military standards”: overstated
There is evidence China promotes “military-civil fusion,” meaning civilian infrastructure and ships can support military operations.
But:
China does have:
- not every commercial vessel is literally a warship-quality platform,
- the claim that “every Chinese flag-bearing ship could threaten a destroyer with drones” is speculative.
Those are real strategic concerns.
- maritime militia fleets,
- dual-use logistics,
- large commercial shipbuilding capacity,
- growing unmanned systems capability.
Taiwan invasion assumptions: speculative
You said:
That is military speculation, not established fact.
Analysts debate possible invasion scenarios:
Northern Taiwan is one possibility, but Taiwan’s terrain and beaches make amphibious assault extremely difficult.
- blockade,
- missile strikes,
- cyber attacks,
- airborne assaults,
- amphibious landings,
- seizure of outlying islands.
“The US is deleting its missile stockpile” because of the Middle East: misleading
The U.S. has used large numbers of interceptors and munitions in conflicts involving:
But “deleting its stockpile” is exaggerated language.
- the Red Sea,
- Houthis,
- Ukraine support,
- broader Middle East operations.
There are genuine concerns among U.S. defense analysts about:
That concern is real.
- industrial production rates,
- replenishment speed,
- munitions shortages in a prolonged Pacific conflict.
Bottom line
Your overall thesis is not fringe:
Where your post becomes less factual and more speculative is:
- China has become much more militarily assertive,
- it has territorial disputes with many neighbors,
- it has rapidly expanded naval and missile capabilities,
- Taiwan is a genuine geopolitical flashpoint,
- many countries in the Indo-Pacific are increasingly worried about Chinese coercion.
So the core concerns are grounded in reality, but some conclusions go beyond what can currently be proven.
- assumptions about exact invasion plans,
- inevitability of surprise attack,
- claims about all civilian ships being military-capable,
- some comparisons to Nazi Germany,
- certainty about future war outcomes.
se7landrover97 said:I did a little research and this is what I found:
Your description of “ramming tactics” and coercive maritime behavior is broadly supported by reporting from multiple governments and international observers.
Taiwan: Xi Jinping’s statements
Correct. Xi Jinping has repeatedly stated that Taiwan is part of China and that “reunification” is a goal. China has not ruled out the use of force.
However:
Hong Kong comparison: partially accurate but simplified
- Beijing officially still says it prefers “peaceful reunification.”
- Whether China intends to invade soon is debated among analysts.
Your point about Hong Kong reflects real developments:
So concerns in Taiwan about losing political freedoms under Beijing are very real and widely documented.
- after the 2019 protests, Beijing imposed the National Security Law,
- opposition politicians and activists were arrested or disqualified,
- electoral rules were changed to ensure “patriots” govern Hong Kong.
But calling all current officials “puppets” is more political characterization than objective fact.
“China has built a bigger fleet than the USA”: needs clarification
This is one of the most important nuances.
By number of ships, China’s navy is now larger than the U.S. Navy. This is widely acknowledged, including by the U.S. Department of Defense.
However:
So “bigger fleet” is true numerically, but it does not automatically mean militarily superior overall.
- the U.S. Navy still has major advantages in:
- aircraft carriers,
- nuclear submarines,
- global logistics,
- combat experience,
- tonnage,
- power projection.
“China turned into an arms factory like Nazi Germany”: partially true analogy, but limited
China has massively expanded:
And China’s civilian shipbuilding industry is indeed closely linked to military capability.
- shipbuilding,
- missile production,
- drones,
- naval modernization,
- industrial capacity.
But comparisons to Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany should be made carefully:
Analogy can help illustrate concerns, but it can also oversimplify important differences.
- Germany under Hitler explicitly pursued rapid territorial conquest and world war.
- China is certainly more assertive and militarily expansionist in some regions, but its behavior and global strategy are not identical to Nazi Germany’s ideology or conduct.
“Every Chinese ship built to military standards”: overstated
There is evidence China promotes “military-civil fusion,” meaning civilian infrastructure and ships can support military operations.
But:
China does have:
- not every commercial vessel is literally a warship-quality platform,
- the claim that “every Chinese flag-bearing ship could threaten a destroyer with drones” is speculative.
Those are real strategic concerns.
- maritime militia fleets,
- dual-use logistics,
- large commercial shipbuilding capacity,
- growing unmanned systems capability.
Taiwan invasion assumptions: speculative
You said:
That is military speculation, not established fact.
Analysts debate possible invasion scenarios:
Northern Taiwan is one possibility, but Taiwan’s terrain and beaches make amphibious assault extremely difficult.
- blockade,
- missile strikes,
- cyber attacks,
- airborne assaults,
- amphibious landings,
- seizure of outlying islands.
“The US is deleting its missile stockpile” because of the Middle East: misleading
The U.S. has used large numbers of interceptors and munitions in conflicts involving:
But “deleting its stockpile” is exaggerated language.
- the Red Sea,
- Houthis,
- Ukraine support,
- broader Middle East operations.
There are genuine concerns among U.S. defense analysts about:
That concern is real.
- industrial production rates,
- replenishment speed,
- munitions shortages in a prolonged Pacific conflict.
Bottom line
Your overall thesis is not fringe:
Where your post becomes less factual and more speculative is:
- China has become much more militarily assertive,
- it has territorial disputes with many neighbors,
- it has rapidly expanded naval and missile capabilities,
- Taiwan is a genuine geopolitical flashpoint,
- many countries in the Indo-Pacific are increasingly worried about Chinese coercion.
So the core concerns are grounded in reality, but some conclusions go beyond what can currently be proven.
- assumptions about exact invasion plans,
- inevitability of surprise attack,
- claims about all civilian ships being military-capable,
- some comparisons to Nazi Germany,
- certainty about future war outcomes.





