VCman U jus wsh U R Kul lyk I M, I RUL dood!
Seriously though, it looks like I've managed to generally piss off Vancouverman. My 5 short messages did indeed make a point (whether one agrees with it or not), and they wasted an infinitesimal amount of bandwidth and overhead.
So, why are you actually irritated with me? Something I said on this thread, or another?
Back to the point, if the guy running this message board really does want to leave the email size limit to 1000 characters, to save bandwidth, I can't be too unhappy with this since he's providing me with a service which I'm not paying anything for. My feeling was that if we let him know that we'd like it raised, he might well do it. It doesn't actually save bandwidth or storage space if one sends 3 1000 character messages rather than 1 3K message. The 3 1K messages actually use up more space.
Seriously though, it looks like I've managed to generally piss off Vancouverman. My 5 short messages did indeed make a point (whether one agrees with it or not), and they wasted an infinitesimal amount of bandwidth and overhead.
So, why are you actually irritated with me? Something I said on this thread, or another?
Back to the point, if the guy running this message board really does want to leave the email size limit to 1000 characters, to save bandwidth, I can't be too unhappy with this since he's providing me with a service which I'm not paying anything for. My feeling was that if we let him know that we'd like it raised, he might well do it. It doesn't actually save bandwidth or storage space if one sends 3 1000 character messages rather than 1 3K message. The 3 1K messages actually use up more space.