Search results

"you're a RAGING anti-dentite" "I'm huge, Jerry"

Can't sneak anything past you (for the record, the B6/B7 chassis in S4 and RS4 model has the 4.2 w/manual and AWD...with a sportier 60/40 bias toward the rear). Unfortunately, The States never got The B6/7 RS4 in Avant body style :(

lol, the '68/'69 A-body had the option of either a BumbleBee Stripe around the trunk, a longitudal stripe along the side, or a stripe delete. The GTS had buckets and a console where The Swinger was more stripped-down.

My 1st car was a '69 340 Dart GTS (alas w/a torqueflite) Reilly Motorsports makes a disc/coil-over K-member that eliminates those awful torsion bars (https://www.reillymotorsports.com/?target=product&product_id=16247) they also have a 4-link rear. I put a Gen-III hemi/Tremec 6-Speed in a '68...

a car isn't an appliance for me...if I'm going to spend time doing something/anything, I will certain take strides in making that endeavor enjoyable. My preference is for a German, naturally aspirated V8 backed by a 6-speed manual (both my current dailies..one being a wagon and...

...make it a simple 'meritocracy' whereby each team (male or female) receive the same percentage of the receipts (gate+merch+ratings)... as an aside, am I a sexist/misogynist for wanting to have crazy-sex w/Megan??

Atlantis, (similar to Great Pharaoh, Tiger, etc.) Fk/DFK is very YMMV. I'd go-in with the expectation of a 'hard no', but there have been exceptions

unfortunately, the ego-investment of the sheep disallow objectivity and self-reflection. Bigotry (and all the other personality traits this president possesses) are cloaked in the lie of protectionism and fueled through the fear-mongering of his base.

...and neither has he. Divide all his financial claims by 100 and I'm betting that's closer to the 'real' number. If you believe for one second he's a billionaire, I've got a golf course to sell you which brings me back to my previous question...why is it so important to come to his defense...

which is the focus of this thread...why is it sooooo obvious to some and either not seen or deemed forgivable by others? I'm not being facetious...I really want to know what the attraction is.

I'm certain if your dad funneled you over 400 million dollars you'd amass a far greater fortune w/out having to declare bankruptcy multiple times. He's the only guy to BK a casino, lol. The presidency is just a cash-grab...he's no builder/businessman

this list is dubious at best, the majority of which are easily refuted and the remaining have an opposite (more detrimental) effect. They're banking on making the 'thinking public' so exhausted by the lies/rhetoric that they'll throw up their hands in frustration... let's face it, this...

substitute utilitarian with ignorant, and as far as fun goes, it's the antithesis

World issues have been a mess since the beginning of time (we just happen to stick our noses into any/every conflict that suits our needs), so no sense arguing that the current policy(ies) are anyone's doing...but tweeting threats is certainly a new phenomenon. Domestically, that's definitely...

only when it comes to their daughters, lol

stats say their numbers are shrinking. I can hardly wait to see a few mixed-race babies being produced...wonder if Roe v. Wade would make a quick come-back then :)

exactly...and chock-full of hypocrisy (like everything else). If there's a way for The Government to profit from legalizing it, it'll gain traction, but the religious-right will scream from their self-proclaimed 'moral high-ground' and kill it. Too bad, cuz it's the only way most of them would...

pulled out of Syria after declaring that The US has defeated ISIS?? We still maintain about 400 troops in Syria which creates an opportunity for any of the territory fought (and won) to be at risk. ISIS being an 'idealism' isn't 'defeated'...it just finds somewhere else to be. The premise of...

My original post was specific to the current administration and my 'what-aboutism' comment was just an illustration of the tactics used by his supporters in an attempt to change the discussion from his behavior (which I believe is wholly indefensible) to the conduct of any/every one that...

I thought this was specific to the current occupant of The White House? If we're wanting to go down the classic Fox News tactic of 'what-aboutism', I'd cede that the vast majority of our leaders (especially in the last 30 years + Nixon) lied/obscured/equivocated with impunity...but no where...