SP asked me to do her bareback!!! YIKES!

[InTheBum]

Had a session last night with an asian SP off CL. I blew my load pretty fast during the BBBJ and during round 2, I couldn't cum if my life depended on it...at least for the first 20 minutes...tons of pounding action, tit fucking, BBBJ, multiple HJ's...then the woman suggested I pump her without a condom!

This startled me quite a bit, since I have never been asked to do that with a SP. Marrying their relatives and then bring them to Wangcouver...sure ...but pumping bareback...YIKES! This was totally unexpected since at the beginning of the session the SP stated no kissing and for her to lather herself up in the shower...in other words...hands off. I was expecting pretty piss poor service, in the first 5 minutes, then she did a 180. Also, she asked me to come stay with her in Hong Kong in the future.

I know I can be an ass sometimes on this board just to get a reaction, but when it comes to girls providing service, I don't lie or exaggerate. Also, I obviously declined the bareback invite, and stated to her it wasn't safe...

In addition, this isnt a drugged out crack whore off of Hastings. This Asian SP would get tons of guys hitting on her at a club. She was petite, busting out, and had a cute face with nice teeth.

What do you folks make of all this? LAG couldn't understand it...and I told him, she said I was hot.

 

[mpeg]

hey don't hide it ... share the SP so we can avoid.

 

[Stew]

What is to avoid? Always use a condom and decline BB FS. As long as you stick to that with every escort the fact that some escort might offer BB FS should not put you at risk, should it? It is not as if she pulled off the condom right before cowgirl or something like that. If an escort pulls the condom off and tries to sneak in BB FS then the community needs to be warned, but if she is offering BB FS just decline and keep on the condom.....

hey don't hide it ... share the SP so we can avoid.

 

[Aeiyah]

I would stay clear of any SP that would offer bareback FS , even if I was playing with a condom. I would never have intercourse with someone that didn't insist on playing safe all the time. Although using condoms reduces risk, it's not risk free. Condoms can fail and accidents do happen. I don't want to be the accident victim with someone who may have allowed others in her playpen without the safety net.

 

[littlejimbigher]

Maybe she wanted your baby and child support.

 

[slamma]

I just returned to pooning about nine months ago after a ten year hiatus and I haven't had it happen to me lately. But this happened to me twice when I first came into the hobby. I think this occurs a lot more often than we hear about. I doubt that many SPs who have been around for a while can honestly claim to never have had BBFS with any client.

 

[ihatemyskirt]

She is tired of being an sp and wants to get pregnant so you and she can live happily ever after on your ranch with all your beautiful little half asian babies.
Duh.

 

[Stew]

True, accidents happen. I think we should keep in mind that many SPs and many clients are already having condom-less sex with people in their lives, be it SOs or friends with benefits. Thus, the playpen has already been entered without a safety net. That applies to both clients and SPs. That is the backdrop against which we all play.

Does the fact that this SP offered this one client BBFS change the risk appreciably? If she was offering to all clients then maybe it does. Otherwise it is one anecdotal report.....

I would stay clear of any SP that would offer bareback FS , even if I was playing with a condom. I would never have intercourse with someone that didn't insist on playing safe all the time. Although using condoms reduces risk, it's not risk free. Condoms can fail and accidents do happen. I don't want to be the accident victim with someone who may have allowed others in her playpen without the safety net.

 

[Aeiyah]

True, accidents happen. I think we should keep in mind that many SPs and many clients are already having condom-less sex with people in their lives, be it SOs or friends with benefits. Thus, the playpen has already been entered without a safety net. That applies to both clients and SPs. That is the backdrop against which we all play.

Does the fact that this SP offered this one client BBFS change the risk appreciably? If she was offering to all clients then maybe it does. Otherwise it is one anecdotal report.....

There is a considerable difference between someone who has a single fluid-bound significant other that they have condom-less sex with and someone who would offer to have condom-less sex with a virtual stranger. I have no problem with having safe sex with someone from the first category. I would never touch someone in the second category.

I would have concerns about any one that would knowingly have sex with someone else who is known to practice non-safe sex. Condom-less sex with your s.o., where you know that each other is clean, is safe as long as both you and you s.o. are the only partners you go condom-less.

There's still risk involved and there is only one way to eliminate it completely. It's a matter of what degree is acceptable. Knowing that a potential partner is willing to engage in unsafe practices is one that is unacceptable to me.

 

[slamma]

I don't get it. I consider myself to be the average dude. Every club / bar pick-up that I have ever had in my life ended with BB intercourse. Most if not all of these bar stars are banging a different guy every Friday and Saturday night and pretty much every guy I know has no problem with it. But when it comes to an SP doing BBFS with a select client(s), she is talked about as if she is some pariah. Why ?

 

[Aeiyah]

Most if not all of these bar stars are banging a different guy every Friday and Saturday night and pretty much every guy I know has no problem with it.

The crowd I hang out with is thinks differently. And sorry, you wouldn't be welcome amongst my group of play friends.

 

[slamma]

Damn it ! My loss. Oh well, life goes on.....

 

[leelee]

I don't get it....

How come you guys ONLY become concerned about safety when it is YOUR health that is on the line?

I find it rather hypocritical of anyone to suddenly be concerned about safety after a girl has performed a bbbj on them.

Perhaps your "deeply rooted" health concerns should extend to the lady that you are seeing - not just yourselves.

 

[Stew]

I appreciate your points that you make. Yet given the level of cheating going on can it truly be said that you know for certain someone is clean and that that person is not going condom-less with others? SOs and friends with benefits may have sex with others. We hope they use condoms but....

Thus, we may be having safe sex with all sorts of people who are involved in "unsafe" sex without them even knowing about it (that is, SPs and clients with cheating SOs). I appreciate that there is a difference between sex with the cheating SO and sex with the Sp or client of that SO.

There is a considerable difference between someone who has a single fluid-bound significant other that they have condom-less sex with and someone who would offer to have condom-less sex with a virtual stranger. I have no problem with having safe sex with someone from the first category. I would never touch someone in the second category.

I would have concerns about any one that would knowingly have sex with someone else who is known to practice non-safe sex. Condom-less sex with your s.o., where you know that each other is clean, is safe as long as both you and you s.o. are the only partners you go condom-less.

There's still risk involved and there is only one way to eliminate it completely. It's a matter of what degree is acceptable. Knowing that a potential partner is willing to engage in unsafe practices is one that is unacceptable to me.

 

[LittleAsianGuy]

Sp who would have sex without a condom could also poke holes in the condom before a session. You should post the name of this sp so we can all advoid her. She might have some disease which she wants to spread or seriously fucked in the head. When i talk to you on offline i always get the impression you're making this shit up. Im sure all the sp you had sessions with would love to have your baby or marry you

 

[heavenly.holly6]

Think about it, if she wanted you to do her bareback your probably not the first. We should definatly know who this SP is. Her practices are unprofessional and unsafe. Some may be ok still seeing her wrapping it up, but even then knowing the practices that she uses even with a condom it makes the risk that much higher. In no way do I feel that posting her name would unacceptable, its no different than if you were writing a review on her.

 

[FortunateOne]

I don't get it. I consider myself to be the average dude. Every club / bar pick-up that I have ever had in my life ended with BB intercourse. Most if not all of these bar stars are banging a different guy every Friday and Saturday night and pretty much every guy I know has no problem with it. But when it comes to an SP doing BBFS with a select client(s), she is talked about as if she is some pariah. Why ?

Remember that athlete who picked up a girl in a club, had bbfs? She got pregnant, duh. Let alone the stds, pregnancy is for life, dude.

Bar stars doing a different guy every Friday and Saturday night do this with 2 guys a week.

Sps do this with 20-30 (in the case of asian sps) a week. You do the math. That's why these guys want to know who and where in order to avoid her. The guy who says yes to bbfs is usually the same guy who has an std (another athlete in the news, brought up on charges with 2 different women for having unprotected sex knowing he was HIV.) The trouble with the HIV guys is that they seek out bar stars or whoever in order to have unprotected sex, I can only assume that they hate their life and want to hurt as many people as they can.

I should add, that every now and then someone comes up with this claim of bbfs offer from an sp and to this date no one ever comes back to say who it was. I do think that bbfs is an urban legend.

 

[slamma]

I won't dispute most of what you are saying - be it fact or conjecture. What I am suggesting is that if any pooner wanted a list of experienced SPs who have never had BBFS with a client, then that list would be an awful short one. If one were to avoid all SPs who have done this then one should just simply quit pooning.

As Auld Ball points out, any pooner that has been around long enough ( and is not unhygenic or butt fucken ugly ) would have had this offered up once or twice. You are entitled to your opinion but if you think BBFS is urban legend then you are mistaken.

 

[brad333]

i would never bareback an sp girls in a million years ! or any working girl ! period ! thats just fcked up

 

[InTheBum]

If you name a SP who does BBFS then you get all the guys who do this giving her a call. It's a no-win situation.

I agree with Timid, so I won't be giving out her name. I didn't get the impression she is a freak at all, so I don't want some nutcase on this board planting his seed in her and or worse...