Who’s talking insane, Trudeau has royally fucked us, the Germans came begging for Canadian gas and he said no, Northern gateway a 5 day shipping route to the Asian market all shut down because Steven Guilbeault the eco Nazi wants it all shut down. Now the Libs suddenly are are talking east west pipelines. This country has had nothing but very stupid politicians in power way too long, tax, tax, tax is all they come up with, we need ports and pipelines to get us off the US tit. All the added immigrants have congested our hospitals, schools and housing, it will take a long time to right this ship.
Northern gateway was an environmental abomination before, and still is now. The "climate denier" crowd were idiotic before and nothing about the political "Trump versus the world" situation today has changed the FACT that the earth is warming up rapidly thanks to carbon emissions, and every aspect of life on earth is becoming harder and more threatened because of that. The "do nothing about it, ever" crowd may score a tactical victory thanks to the political chaos (driven by some world leaders who are pushing the denial movement), but long-term, the world's prospects for survival will still be fucked. One problem does not disappear because another one arises to compete with it for attention.
That is why the east-west pipeline to send Canadian petroleum to Canadian refineries back east for serving Canadian needs is the only pipeline project I will support. (And on that, they need to build it fast, like wartime fast.)
Once that is in place and our refined fuel supply secure from US interference, we (along with Mexico) can cut the exports off, and hopefully the price shock will collapse their corrupt and demented regime.
As for the Albertans' complaints about the revenue, there are ways around that for a smart government, even a carbon-emissions reducing one, plus why would they care where the money comes from as long as it comes? Unless of course the motivation of people like Smith is not about revenue but about their true allegiances.
As for Europe, Canada did not say no to them, but when the USA engineered the Ukraine conflict over long term, part of their motivation was to get Europe to replace Russian oil and gas with exclusively US sources. The LNG projects here were all geared towards Asian customers (hmm), but that was in part because the demand in Europe was spoken for. Now Canada can act on filling that demand, but it is dependent on the Russian and US sources being shunned by the EU.
Either way, we must be self-sufficient in meeting domestic Canadian needs first, then exports to Asia and Europe are secondary, and by that point we may be supplying nothing to the US, and if their shale oil cannot meet their own demand without Canada and Mexico helping, they are fucked (and nobody will feel sorry for them).
It also needs to be said that any moves we and Europe can make simultaneously to reduce our carbon fuel demand actually make it easier to solve this problem as we go along. You might hate the idea of EV's (why?) or carbon pricing, but strategically it puts us in a improved position to benefit from having less domestic civilian demand. Like in wartime, the more fuel we save, the more the "war effort" goes well for the sharp end of our society.
So, you want Canadian investors to spend billions on infrastructure to supply Germany with gas?
What happens in a few years when the Ukraine war is over and the Germans resume buying cheap Russian gas?
I will point this fact out: in the conversation:
Since the outbreak of Ukraine hostilities the Russians also completed a number of oil and gas pipelines that go directly to China, and their trade of carbon energy to China has grown a lot, even using things like their arctic shipping route.
Even assuming the Ukraine war ends with an end to energy sanctions on the Russia to Europe trade, there is no guarantee that Europe will be able to draw upon Russian sources like they used to. That is leaving aside whether they even want to restart it on either side for political reasons.