Congress to start TRUMP impeachment process

Status
Not open for further replies.

marsvolta

Well-known member
Aug 31, 2009
962
834
93
Why is it now Trumps problem to solve every civil war in the world ???
Did Bill clinton or Barry Obama solve them all during their term in office???
no, no... where did you get that this was about the Syrian civil war? the Kurds were instrumental in the fight against ISIS. they are currently still holding ISIS fighters. i guess they can just let those guys go now...

he sure wasn't talking to other Repulicans about it:
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author
 

Gardener

Active member
May 9, 2017
326
66
28
no, no... where did you get that this was about the Syrian civil war? the Kurds were instrumental in the fight against ISIS. they are currently still holding ISIS fighters. i guess they can just let those guys go now...

he sure wasn't talking to other Repulicans about it:
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author
12,000 Kurdish fighters have died in the fight with ISIS. Just to frame exactly how much these people have sacrificed so that the west feels safe. Utterly shameful what trump did today. He’s a backstabbing, spineless dotard.

Speaking of dotard’s, I see that a North Korea has walked away from nuclear negotiations with the US. I wonder if trumps getting another beautiful love letter from KJU. What a fool trump is, like literally a god dammed fool.
 

badbadboy

Well-known member
Nov 2, 2006
9,544
306
83
In Lust Mostly
CNN lies.
You're not even trying to have your post taken seriously if using CNN as the source of your news.
They are the laughingstock of news everywhere!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...uraging-government-officials-to-lie?_amp=true
Do you even bother to check the reputation of your source before you post? So you stumbled upon a Conservative rag via Google with a poor reputation. There are better ones available if you look a little harder.

https://www.thoughtco.com/top-conservative-magazines-3303617

Washington Examiner weekly publication of 45,000
Whereas the Washington Posts publishing numbers:

Circulation
356,768 (Daily, 2015)
838,014 (Sunday, 2013)
1,000,000 (Digital, 2018)

They’ve been found to publish outright false stories:

Anti-immigration stories Edit
In January 2019, the Washington Examiner published a story with the headline, "Border rancher: 'We've found prayer rugs out here. It's unreal'." Shortly thereafter, President Donald Trump cited the story as another justification for a border wall amid the 2018-2019 federal government shutdown. The story in question cited one anonymous rancher who offered no evidence of these Muslim prayer rugs, such as photos. The story provided no elaboration on how the rancher knew the rugs in question were Muslim prayer rugs. The author of the story formerly worked as press secretary for the anti-immigration group Federation for American Immigration Reform. Stories of Muslim prayer rugs at the border are urban myths that have frequently popped up since at least 2005, but with no evidence to substantiate the claims.[16][17][18][19][20][21] The Examiner never issued a clarification or retracted the story.


Published another false story about The New York Times

False story about The New York Times Edit
On June 20, 2019, the paper falsely reported that The New York Times had "fed information" to the FBI about Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump's son-in-law. The paper issued a major correction within a day. Prior to the correction, Trump tweeted, "Just revealed that the Failing and Desperate New York Times was feeding false stories about me, & those associated with me, to the FBI," which was retweeted over 20,000 times.[24]


This basically shows their only goal is to post a conservative view without checking the accuracy of their reporting.
 

Shakerod

Active member
May 7, 2008
616
71
28
No matter what Trump does the MSM will criticize him for it. If he would have said he is sending more troops to Syria they would have said he is going against his campaign promise to stop these endless wars and called him a “War Monger.” My how the left has changed their tune when it comes to wars? I can remember attending the anti-war protests in 2003 in downtown Vancouver when Bush II went into Iraq after 9/11. The politicians on the left in the U.S. and Canada were all speaking out against it. Suddenly because its Trump these wars are ok? Total hypocrites.
 

Shakerod

Active member
May 7, 2008
616
71
28
I also think it’s a dumb move.

All #45 will be doing in the 2020 campaign is crowing ‘witch hunt’ and the Maga types will only see Dems as sore losers from 2016.

The way to get this guy is through Indictments following the money with the emoluments laws and corruption with money laundering.

The way their republic is structured having a majority Senate makes Impeachment impossible no matter what Congress’ investigation uncovers.
Explain something to me...because I am dying to know? They have been vetting Trump trying to find something on him ever since he declared he was going to be a candidate. They had 12 republicans running against him, which included their favoured Deep State candidate Jeb Bush. Shortly after he won the presidency Chuck Schulmer threw down the gauntlet by making a comment right out of the mafia playbook, “You take on the Intelligence community and they have six ways to Sunday to get back at you.” ( I am sure that Trump had a JFK moment flashing in his head) So now they have spent three years trying to dig up dirt on him but have yet to find anything. At what point do you say.”Let’s forget about this nonsense and let the voters decide?” Or is that all the Democrats have going for them in 2020?
 
L

LADY-VIA

lets see it happen. It's just a soap opera.. Would you like to get kicked in your LEFT NUT OR RIGHT.
 

clu

Active member
Oct 3, 2010
1,268
14
38
Vancouver
Explain something to me...because I am dying to know? They have been vetting Trump trying to find something on him ever since he declared he was going to be a candidate. They had 12 republicans running against him, which included their favoured Deep State candidate Jeb Bush. Shortly after he won the presidency Chuck Schulmer threw down the gauntlet by making a comment right out of the mafia playbook, “You take on the Intelligence community and they have six ways to Sunday to get back at you.” ( I am sure that Trump had a JFK moment flashing in his head) So now they have spent three years trying to dig up dirt on him but have yet to find anything. At what point do you say.”Let’s forget about this nonsense and let the voters decide?” Or is that all the Democrats have going for them in 2020?
Whatever argument you would use to justify Hillary still guilty after being before a Senate Committee 11 times for the same thing, it's that one.
 

badbadboy

Well-known member
Nov 2, 2006
9,544
306
83
In Lust Mostly
Explain something to me...because I am dying to know? They have been vetting Trump trying to find something on him ever since he declared he was going to be a candidate. They had 12 republicans running against him, which included their favoured Deep State candidate Jeb Bush. Shortly after he won the presidency Chuck Schulmer threw down the gauntlet by making a comment right out of the mafia playbook, “You take on the Intelligence community and they have six ways to Sunday to get back at you.” ( I am sure that Trump had a JFK moment flashing in his head) So now they have spent three years trying to dig up dirt on him but have yet to find anything. At what point do you say.”Let’s forget about this nonsense and let the voters decide?” Or is that all the Democrats have going for them in 2020?
There’s a real question in there somewhere?
 

Correct

Always
Dec 4, 2018
503
9
0
Proudly in Revelstoke BC
No matter what Trump does the MSM will criticize him for it. If he would have said he is sending more troops to Syria they would have said he is going against his campaign promise to stop these endless wars and called him a “War Monger.” My how the left has changed their tune when it comes to wars? I can remember attending the anti-war protests in 2003 in downtown Vancouver when Bush II went into Iraq after 9/11. The politicians on the left in the U.S. and Canada were all speaking out against it. Suddenly because its Trump these wars are ok? Total hypocrites.
Exactly!

When the troops were sent there, it was supposed to be for only 30 days to help out a little.
It is about time they were finally pulled many years later.

So many of you only read the left wing news, and think far left.
Twenty years ago I was naive enough to believe some of their BS as well, not any more.
I can see past the smoke and mirrors now, and get the whole picture.
Go travel the world, read some news that is centered not far left, and learn to see the truth behind the left wing corruption.
 

80watts

Well-known member
May 20, 2004
3,344
1,267
113
Victoria
I would wait until the ny state has his tax returns and begin the impeachment progress. There is a good reason why he didn't publish before the election. It tells where his eggs are in the basket. The big thing to check for is money laundering, like how much cash was going through his hotels.... Also wondering if he owned any electronic voting stations....

As for the majority of the senate being republican, the senate is coming up for re-election. Each republican senator will have to ask himself/herself did Trump willing break the law, if so was it for Trump's own benifit? The fact that you are going outside political lines of your country. The fact that he didn't do this right after he was elected, only after Biden put his name in for the Democrats did Trump start his witch-hunt.

The problem I see with Trump is he surrounds himself with yes men..... Go back and read the press talk about republicans who did not want to be in the presidential team; ever wonder why.... What I do know for sure is that the American people did not get the best people to advise the President, mainly because I think that they did not want to say every meeting, I thank you Mr President for the opportunity you have given me etc.... etc... you know like that televised cabinet meeting where everyone around the table was sucking up to him in the worst possible way.....
 

marsvolta

Well-known member
Aug 31, 2009
962
834
93
Senate Intel releases 2nd volume of report on 2016 Russian interference (no mention of it on Fox News yet of course)
https://www.axios.com/senate-intell...ort-425274e8-1780-44c3-963a-cd839ef1cbe5.html

oops! wasn't anyone sharing with senate republicans the white house talking points? that Ukraine was responsible for... getting Trump elected? because its a corrupt country? still haven't figured that line of thinking out myself...

the rift between senate republicans and the white house widens another foot.
 

Shakerod

Active member
May 7, 2008
616
71
28
There’s a real question in there somewhere?
Typical of the left nowadays...if they don’t like the question, they ignore it, or make something up.

Again, and I’ll word it another way for you: why all this effort to get rid of him if he is doing that bad of a job?
 

LM987

Active member
Dec 28, 2015
448
121
43
The master of diversion techniques may be using the Hail Mary this time. Starting a war without comprehending the long range impact on the rest of the world.
When you bail on your allies how quick will other allies be willing to help in the future?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts