Give him a break. Its the first topic to pique his interest after 9 years of lurking.I am going to remember the PM’s actions as opposed to his brand and will vote acccordingly.
Are you always pedantic or just on PERB?
Give him a break. Its the first topic to pique his interest after 9 years of lurking.I am going to remember the PM’s actions as opposed to his brand and will vote acccordingly.
Are you always pedantic or just on PERB?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GMou-WAGfEI am going to remember the PM’s actions as opposed to his brand and will vote acccordingly.
Are you always pedantic or just on PERB?
The whole nation is full of sanctimonious hypocrites, hardly anybody produces any of the products consumed whether retail, wholesale or what any level of Canadian government buys in the name of Canadians. Selling Canadian real estate off to slave-masters that grew rich selling products in Canada. More people, more carbon, and more encroachment upon environment to pay for lifestyles that don't pay for themselves. Sociopaths obsess about how much more important that rule-of-law is over doing what's right for Canada. The CEO of SNC Lavalin says to the effect that skilled Canadians could likely not only be scattered and loose vital contacts overseas that provide vital foreign income to balance Canada's trade deficits, but that those skilled Canadians would leave Canada and Canada would not only loose sources of vital foreign income but loose thousands of skilled Canadians departing Canada.Rather than speculating on what would happen if Scheer was as much of a sanctimonious hypocrite as Trudeau, maybe you can explain why the Libs shut down the Justice Committee hearings, why Trudeau will not waive Cabinet privilege for Wilson-Raybould for anything subsequent to her resignation, why he will not waive cabinet privilege so Philpott can speak and how exactly SNC Lavalin in any way qualifies for a deferred prosecution? Read the legislation and case law. If you still think that SNC meets the standard for a deferred prosecution and that Wilson-Raybould was wrong not to interfere with Roussel’s decision I’d love to hear your argument.
You spelled lose wrong three times. Just so you know. Never heard of Pre war nazis raising a puppy and then having to kill it. What’s that got to do with anything?The whole nation is full of sanctimonious hypocrites, hardly anybody produces any of the products consumed whether retail, wholesale or what any level of Canadian government buys in the name of Canadians. Selling Canadian real estate off to slave-masters that grew rich selling products in Canada. More people, more carbon, and more encroachment upon environment to pay for lifestyles that don't pay for themselves. Sociopaths obsess about how much more important that rule-of-law is over doing what's right for Canada. The CEO of SNC Lavalin says to the effect that skilled Canadians could likely not only be scattered and loose vital contacts overseas that provide vital foreign income to balance Canada's trade deficits, but that those skilled Canadians would leave Canada and Canada would not only loose sources of vital foreign income but loose thousands of skilled Canadians departing Canada.
What about the rule-of-law embedded in trade treaties that guarantee access to marginalized and sometimes slave labour. What about all the rules-of-law that drove foreign branch plants out of Canada that were producing products for the Canadian market, that were helping to keep Canada's trade deficit balanced. Before that the rules-of-law that made life unpleasant for Canadian entrepreneurs who couldn't produce exportable products in Canada or even for the Canadian market and left Canada in widely publicized brain-drains. What is it about law schools in Canada that turn out so many sociopaths that can keep themselves moneyed while Canadians and a spouse spend a lifetime paying off mortgage or sleeping on sidewalks? Pre-war Nazis had to raise a puppy well into adulthood and kill the dog before going into service of the Reich. What is it that Canadian law schools and law firms require of themselves that turn out so many sociopaths and how do we prevent that? While I'm at it how about the incompetence that scuttled putting away culprits by publicly revealing identity of a witness in British Columbia casino money laundering.
Wasn't that the Kingsmen?You spelled lose wrong three times. Just so you know. Never heard of Pre war nazis raising a puppy and then having to kill it. What’s that got to do with anything?
Your response to this thread is utterly clueless and lacks any kind of rational thought or coherency.The whole nation is full of sanctimonious hypocrites, hardly anybody produces any of the products consumed whether retail, wholesale or what any level of Canadian government buys in the name of Canadians. Selling Canadian real estate off to slave-masters that grew rich selling products in Canada. More people, more carbon, and more encroachment upon environment to pay for lifestyles that don't pay for themselves. Sociopaths obsess about how much more important that rule-of-law is over doing what's right for Canada. The CEO of SNC Lavalin says to the effect that skilled Canadians could likely not only be scattered and loose vital contacts overseas that provide vital foreign income to balance Canada's trade deficits, but that those skilled Canadians would leave Canada and Canada would not only loose sources of vital foreign income but loose thousands of skilled Canadians departing Canada.
What about the rule-of-law embedded in trade treaties that guarantee access to marginalized and sometimes slave labour. What about all the rules-of-law that drove foreign branch plants out of Canada that were producing products for the Canadian market, that were helping to keep Canada's trade deficit balanced. Before that the rules-of-law that made life unpleasant for Canadian entrepreneurs who couldn't produce exportable products in Canada or even for the Canadian market and left Canada in widely publicized brain-drains. What is it about law schools in Canada that turn out so many sociopaths that can keep themselves moneyed while Canadians and a spouse spend a lifetime paying off mortgage or sleeping on sidewalks? Pre-war Nazis had to raise a puppy well into adulthood and kill the dog before going into service of the Reich. What is it that Canadian law schools and law firms require of themselves that turn out so many sociopaths and how do we prevent that? While I'm at it how about the incompetence that scuttled putting away culprits by publicly revealing identity of a witness in British Columbia casino money laundering.
Why do legal discussions berate analogy, beyond "opening the door" to something else?Never heard of Pre war nazis raising a puppy and then having to kill it. What’s that got to do with anything?
I'd love to make a one-liner that sums up what I said, but there's too much water under the bridge for what's happened to the Canadian economy.Your response to this thread is utterly clueless and lacks any kind of rational thought or coherency.
Please respond when you have a coherant thought as to the subject.
SR
:clap2::clap2::clap2::bounce::clap2::clap2::clap2:I'd love to make a one-liner that sums up what I said, but there's too much water under the bridge for what's happened to the Canadian economy.
Yeah and it has happened under the watch of Trudeau.First off the small stuff like the trip to the island of the Aga Khan at $480,000 then next up is the joke of a "state visit" to India which was a costume fantasy vacation which cost $1,500,000 then there was the $10,500,000 settlement paid to Omar Kadr a convicted terrorist who was "tortured" with sleep deprivation ( His victim an American medic sleeps in a grave thanks to the grenade Kadr threw) and these are the cheap costs of Trudeau's governance.
Move it on up to the illegal border crossers and the costs are over $500,000,000 and tack on the costs of the 50,000 Syrian economic migrants imported into canada is around $1,500,000,000.How about tacking on the untold BILLIONS it will cost Canada for buy used fighter jets from Austrailia.How about the 19 BILLION in debt added to Canada's national Debt and with the latest budget is projected to add another 22 BILLION to that debt.
What are the negative things Trudeau has done.Well right off the bat he got rid of stuff like the childrens fitness tax credit (hockey equipment for kids costs money every year because kids grow) as well as other tax credits oh but he increased the Family Tax credit(he gave more but restricted it to income and made it taxable)...in short Trudeau has FUCKED the "Middle Class" as he wants to destroy it and subjugate Canadians into a welfare state.....which would be his version of and in his own words which he admires
"China's basic dictatorship".Oh yeah how about the untold BILLIONS the Carbon Tax will cost Canadians to foolishly heat their homes and drive to work.A Tax that WONT reduce emissions but will just TAX Canadians(cant raise the GST back up so squeeze in a new TAX with the GST tacked onto it...so much more money to SPEND on SOCIALIST bullshit dogma)
You want a one liner to sum it up here it is.....Trudeau is finishing the job his father never got to do.....which is running Canada into the ground.
SR
Canadian economy is a slow motion train-wreak that started at the end of World War II.I'd love to make a one-liner that sums up what I said, but there's too much water under the bridge for what's happened to the Canadian economy.
Yeah and it has happened under the watch of Trudeau.First off the small stuff like the trip to the island of the Aga Khan at $480,000 then next up is the joke of a "state visit" to India which was a costume fantasy vacation which cost $1,500,000 then there was the $10,500,000 settlement paid to Omar Kadr a convicted terrorist who was "tortured" with sleep deprivation ( His victim an American medic sleeps in a grave thanks to the grenade Kadr threw) and these are the cheap costs of Trudeau's governance.
Move it on up to the illegal border crossers and the costs are over $500,000,000 and tack on the costs of the 50,000 Syrian economic migrants imported into canada is around $1,500,000,000.How about tacking on the untold BILLIONS it will cost Canada for buy used fighter jets from Austrailia.How about the 19 BILLION in debt added to Canada's national Debt and with the latest budget is projected to add another 22 BILLION to that debt.
What are the negative things Trudeau has done.Well right off the bat he got rid of stuff like the childrens fitness tax credit (hockey equipment for kids costs money every year because kids grow) as well as other tax credits oh but he increased the Family Tax credit(he gave more but restricted it to income and made it taxable)...in short Trudeau has FUCKED the "Middle Class" as he wants to destroy it and subjugate Canadians into a welfare state.....which would be his version of and in his own words which he admires
"China's basic dictatorship".Oh yeah how about the untold BILLIONS the Carbon Tax will cost Canadians to foolishly heat their homes and drive to work.A Tax that WONT reduce emissions but will just TAX Canadians(cant raise the GST back up so squeeze in a new TAX with the GST tacked onto it...so much more money to SPEND on SOCIALIST bullshit dogma)
You want a one liner to sum it up here it is.....Trudeau is finishing the job his father never got to do.....which is running Canada into the ground.
SR
Not that I want to start a shitstorm argument with you but I believe this statement is meant to cast doubt that this could be done.....if I'm wrong and have taken it in the wrong light, please feel free to correct me.A radio interview with an influential legal personality March 25th, 2019 says that Omar Khadr was found under rubble with a bullet in his back. That Khadr would have had to have thrown a grenade over an 8 foot wall and 80 feet beyond the wall to kill the U.S. Army medic.
It doesn't even matter whether he "could of" or not. Khadr effectively agreed to a plea deal and plead guilty - case closed. Everyone claiming he got $10 million for being tortured or subject to sleep deprivation is also way off the mark. He got a settlement because the Government of Canada violated his Charter rights, not because he may or may not have been waterboarded or subjected to other forms of "torture" by the US. Some people have a hard time understanding that it is possible for an individual to be guilty of a criminal offense and at the same time have their Charter rights violated - which is basically the case with Kahdr.Not that I want to start a shitstorm argument with you but I believe this statement is meant to cast doubt that this could be done.....if I'm wrong and have taken it in the wrong light, please feel free to correct me.
Lobbing a modern grenade eighty feet, over an eight foot obstacle like a wall, is more than possible.
A grenades weight, and design is for that distance.....I have thrown grenades in conflict that far, but the bullet wasn't in my back ...I can say with utmost certainty from experience .....it's very possible.
Thanks for the support.:clap2::clap2::clap2::bounce::clap2::clap2::clap2:
Uh No....the Government of Canada did not violate his Charter Rights as the Canadian Government did not detain him/torture him etc and he was was not "water boarded".He did throw the grenade the killed a medic(a service member who is obligated to give treatment to both comrades as well as enemy combatants under the Geneva Conventions) which also blinded another US soldier who is disabled for life.It doesn't even matter whether he "could of" or not. Khadr effectively agreed to a plea deal and plead guilty - case closed. Everyone claiming he got $10 million for being tortured or subject to sleep deprivation is also way off the mark. He got a settlement because the Government of Canada violated his Charter rights, not because he may or may not have been waterboarded or subjected to other forms of "torture" by the US. Some people have a hard time understanding that it is possible for an individual to be guilty of a criminal offense and at the same time have their Charter rights violated - which is basically the case with Kahdr.
Supreme Court of Canada already stated in, I think it was 2009 or 2010, that Government violated Kahdr's Sec 7 Charter rights. It has nothing to do with being tortured. It relates to Canadian Government officials going to Gitmo and interrogating/questioning Kahdr. Although Sec 7 is rather difficult to understand, it has to do with due process. And nothing to do with his detainment or whether or not Kahdr was tortured.Thanks for the support.
Uh No....the Government of Canada did not violate his Charter Rights as the Canadian Government did not detain him/torture him etc and he was was not "water boarded".He did throw the grenade the killed a medic(a service member who is obligated to give treatment to both comrades as well as enemy combatants under the Geneva Conventions) which also blinded another US soldier who is disabled for life.
There is video of a young Omar Khadr assembling IED's on Youtube with gusto.....in short he is a fucking TERRORIST that had the JIHADIST faith in his heart.He HAS no fucking rights IMO and the best thing that SHOULD have been done at the time was for
one of the dead medic's cohorts was to take out a side arm and put a bullet between his eyes.
Pretty fucking distgusting when Trudeau hands over 10.5 MILLION to a convicted terrorist and then says to veterans "you are asking more than Canada can give right now".....Trudeau does not care as it is tax payer money he pisses away.
SR
Thats old news.....Trudeau bought off the Canadian media a while back.....lord knows they can only talk about how pretty he is or how nice his socks are and not how he is the most incompetant twit/retard/entitled cock sucker that has ever been Prime Minister of Canada.The Buffalo Chronicle
At Trudeau’s behest, Gould instructed Google News to limit Canadian access to foreign press
Interesting article....
https://buffalochronicle.com/2019/0...ws-to-limit-canadian-access-to-foreign-press/
True about the fact his rights were violated. Trudeau grossly overpaid though. According to my well connected Liberal friends they wanted it buried before Martin had to testify under oath.Supreme Court of Canada already stated in, I think it was 2009 or 2010, that Government violated Kahdr's Sec 7 Charter rights. It has nothing to do with being tortured. It relates to Canadian Government officials going to Gitmo and interrogating/questioning Kahdr. Although Sec 7 is rather difficult to understand, it has to do with due process. And nothing to do with his detainment or whether or not Kahdr was tortured.
Whether or not, in your opinion, it was a grossly exorbitant amount is not relevant to what was being discussed. As is your "well connected "Liberal" friends.True about the fact his rights were violated. Trudeau grossly overpaid though. According to my well connected Liberal friends they wanted it buried before Martin had to testify under oath.





