‘My Sugar Daddy Pays me $12,000 a Month’

[PierreCoeur]

Some men are both man enough and intelligent enough to know hiring a professional will not end in losing half assets.

And a few men are sufficiently intelligent that they avoid either scenario and enjoy the company of many women without a requirement that anyone of them be faithful to him by way of the payment of a significant dollar amount and the request that she put her life on hold and be in servitude to him.
Of course I am just sharing an opinion.

With the statement challenging manhood, I will take the Gentleman approach and remain . . .

 

[felixthecat]

Some men are both man enough and intelligent enough to know hiring a professional will not end in losing half assets.

And a few men are sufficiently intelligent that they avoid either scenario and enjoy the company of many women without a requirement that anyone of them be faithful to him by way of the payment of a significant dollar amount and the request that she put her life on hold and be in servitude to him.
Of course I am just sharing an opinion.

With the statement challenging manhood, I will take the Gentleman approach and remain . . .

I don't think she was targeting you at all. I take "man enough" as feeling secure enough to avoid the "he/I have to pay for it" mentality. We all should be able to agree on that part. That is, paying for what you want can be a rational choice and not an indication something is wrong with you.

Everybody have their preference, whether it is to see many ladies, one, or one plus one the side. Dialing down the judgementalism, there is no absolute reason one choice is better than another. Same for timeframe: people may prefer an hour arrangement / a month / a year / a lifetime.

If an hour-long contract is ok and a lifelong contract is ok, I don't see how I could criticize somebody preferring something in between (1 year). Really a matter a preference. People may have reasons which we don't know.

By the same token, there is no inherent abuse in a year-long exclusive arrangement between consenting adults if we agree that one-hour arrangements are not all abusive and lifelong arrangements are not all abusive.

 

[604jbear]

Out of curiosity, how does the sugar daddy verify that the lady is actually exclusive and not still seeing others on the side?

 

[Addison Cortez]

And a few men are sufficiently intelligent that they avoid either scenario and enjoy the company of many women without a requirement that anyone of them be faithful to him by way of the payment of a significant dollar amount and the request that she put her life on hold and be in servitude to him.
Of course I am just sharing an opinion.

With the statement challenging manhood, I will take the Gentleman approach and remain . . .

yes, individual choice and personal preference is what it boils down to
my dominant nature peeks her volatile head out at often UNnecessary times. I try to keep a leash on her and appreciate the reminder :kiss:

 

[Addison Cortez]

I don't think she was targeting you at all. I take "man enough" as feeling secure enough to avoid the "he/I have to pay for it" mentality. We all should be able to agree on that part. That is, paying for what you want can be a rational choice and not an indication something is wrong with you.

Everybody have their preference, whether it is to see many ladies, one, or one plus one the side. Dialing down the judgementalism, there is no absolute reason one choice is better than another. Same for timeframe: people may prefer an hour arrangement / a month / a year / a lifetime.

If an hour-long contract is ok and a lifelong contract is ok, I don't see how I could criticize somebody preferring something in between (1 year). Really a matter a preference. People may have reasons which we don't know.

By the same token, there is no inherent abuse in a year-long exclusive arrangement between consenting adults if we agree that one-hour arrangements are not all abusive and lifelong arrangements are not all abusive.

thank you seeing through my unclear statement and clarifying for me :love_heart:

 

[UhOh]

Some men are both man enough and intelligent enough to know hiring a professional will not end in losing half assets.

It will if his wife finds out

 

[Addison Cortez]

It will if his wife finds out

Assuming she doesn’t know. I have met wives of gents

 

[PierreCoeur]

yes, individual choice and personal preference is what it boils down to
my dominant nature peeks her volatile head out at often UNnecessary times. I try to keep a leash on her and appreciate the reminder :kiss:

I know . . . I just didn't have a snickers bar today

 

[jamasianman]

But if they can offer 2 million dollars then its probably cheaper than dating a potential golddigger. Think about it, if he can offer two million a year for three years, then that is probably just the tip of the iceberg. I'm thinking like big oil money or relative of person who owns Walmart dollars. Instead of dating someone who is after the money, he puts a price tag on it and can have her yearly for an upfront sum.

If you're worth 50+ million dollars, why risk half or more on normal dating when you can be with a lady who you KNOW is with you for money, but can't take any more than what you have stipulated. I remember reading about a guy who is an engineer or something, he makes a lot of money but has no time to date so he only see Sp's. What is wrong with that? Sometimes people have more money than social skills or they are surrounded by people who are only into them for the money. We don't know what its like to be so rich that we are unsure who is really our friend. Its sad but it exists.

 

[Mrmotorscooter]

I remember years ago reading about the Harem girls and how they had scouts scouring the world looking for a variety of top notch gals. They had to pass a medical and sign an exclusive contract for Two years and were confined to the palace grounds, if they succeeded they were pretty well set for life by the time they left. Hard to imagine a gig like that but all that luxury might not be hard to take I guess.

 

[UhOh]

Assuming she doesn’t know. I have met wives of gents

Will your sp be there there for you though when you're recovering from surgery?
I know some sp's would like to convince us that pooning is a better alternative than marriage but I don't think many are buying that.

 

[Cami Parker]

You took the words right out of my mouth. You’ve literally left me with nothing to say as you’ve covered all the relevant points, as usual my dear sweet and brilliant friend ? hope to get together for playtime soon!!

I didn't find it unusual at all. I have been offered several exclusive arrangements over the years, ranging from 10-50K/month. The average was 30K/month, and only one offer was for 50. From a financial standpoint, it made a lot of sense, but I from a lifestyle point it didn't make any. I love the variety and freedom that having full agency of my life provides me, and signing a 1-3 year exclusive contract with somebody holds zero appeal to me.

I'm not unusual in the rates offered either. My best friend in the industry signed a contract for 2 million a year. They stayed together for 3 years. A lady who used to advertise on this board signed one last year for over 300K/year plus a large signing bonus.

Everything is perspective. What we may consider to be an exorbitant amount of money is pocket change for someone else. We do it too. Spending $30 or $50 on a meal and drinks once in a while is pretty normal for us. In other parts of the world, that is more than 2 weeks salary for a doctor....and for a regular person, just getting clean drinking water is a struggle.

In a sugar daddy relationship, you are asking somebody to put their life on hold for you. If you are hiring a companion as a sugar baby, you are asking her to put her business AND personal life on hold. It isn't the same as hiring somebody by the hour, an experience, or even an extended but finite period of time. The lady is expected to be and to remain single. She is expected to remain monogamous. She is expected to be available on his schedule. If she was a companion, she is also giving up all her regular clients, and the real and genuine relationships she has forged with them. There is a lot more involved than just how many hours of time does he get to spend with her for how much.

In the end, it really just boils down to what the individuals want. As long as both parties are happy with the arrangement, then why or how can those of us on the outside judge it?

 

[Tugela]

It is all relative to how much you have. For example, for someone who had a billion in assets, spending $12K a month on a girlfriend would be like some with a million spending $12 on her. You could afford to spend $12 a month right? What about $120? That would be what someone with 100 million would feel like spending $12k.

The only people who think that is a big number are those who are relatively poor. Rich people would not have an issue with those numbers. I mean, what else would they do with the money? Fill a tub with it and wallow around in it?

If I had a billion in assets, I would be quite happy gifting $5k a day to a suitably desirable woman if I thought that would keep her interest in me. It is chump change for someone with that sort of wealth, and I am surprised that anyone would think otherwise.

 

[PierreCoeur]

If I had a billion in assets, I would be quite happy gifting $5k a day to a suitably desirable woman if I thought that would keep her interest in me. It is chump change for someone with that sort of wealth, and I am surprised that anyone would think otherwise.

In a round about way you actually validated the viewpoints of others. By suggesting that paying to keep a suitably desirable woman's interest in you, you are supporting the notion that the wealthy man is buying a girl's affection for him, where the interest of the girl is the financial arrangement primarily. That is sad. You also say that the money is chump change. Chump means a person easily duped and fooled. I would suggest that is also correct. The man is a fool thinking he has bought loyalty and affection and the girl is a fool because she is now in the servitude of a man because of the payment of chump change. He considers her a chump and he is a chump.

Money can't buy love.

 

[UhOh]

My mother put her life on hold for a lot longer than a year or two to raise a pack of ungrateful kids. She never got anything near $2M per year for it.

 

[westwoody]

You are buying the person, not their love.
You are paying them for a service.
Lay all your cards on the table right at the start so both sides can agree on everything.
Anyone who is very successful should be able to do a cost/benefit analysis and make sure it works for them.

I think any billionaire would want extreme discretion.
The best way to avoid trouble is minimise your exposure ie see as few women as possible.
If one fills your needs that is perfect.
Stick with someone you know and is trustworthy.

 

[PierreCoeur]

I have a very wealthy uncle who would disagree I used to always say this to him and his reply was , maybe sometimmes not but it can rent or lease it he has bought the Love of 5 women and had children with all of them , one lasted over 20 years , I would have to say that might be sad in your books but I know he is very happy ."

and mothers everywhere love to tell there daughters ..ït is as easy to love a rich man as a poor man " what is sad is when other have to judge each other to feel superior over silly things like money , fame , assests etc ...

/being poor or dating loving a poor guy does not make a person virtuous as compared to loving a man with money ,

Yep. With Five women - Children with each, it can't be argued he is a happy man and purchased an awful lot of lasting true love and happiness along the way.

 

[PierreCoeur]

I welcome all opinion. Not just the ones that I agree with. The whole premise of a review forum is to express such opinions and each expression is judgement base no matter how it is perceived by others.

 

[Missy Mariposa]

Will your sp be there there for you though when you're recovering from surgery?
I know some sp's would like to convince us that pooning is a better alternative than marriage but I don't think many are buying that.

Why not? If you're paying me to spend time with you and that time is helping you recover from surgery I'm not seeing the issue.

 

[westwoody]

you just cant help but love someone that takes care of you well in the way they are capable of.

Goes both ways kiddo