Canada Creep @Twitter

[uncleg]

https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=...-media&usg=AFQjCNEqOnmCosICKMQJehrQQ6m1qEFk7w


Going to assume a lot of people here, if not most of us have seen this story over the past couple of days. Don't know what was on the Twitter Account, but from what the media showed it was probably as much wishful thinking as it was being a pervert, though sometimes there seems to be a thin line there. What gave me some pause for thought though was our own little community.

How many threads have started with pictures and comments about the attributes of various people, mostly female, that are in the public domain. Let's go with Fiona Forbes as an example. Does anybody here really think she would appreciate or be thrilled to know she was the subject of discussion here ? The same question for the many other females that, because of there employment have come to the attention of the little head of some of our membership. From my way of thinking, those types of threads are really not that far from the type of activity this hump was involved in.

Your thoughts, especially the ladies that may have had a "review too far"....

 

[MissingOne]

I get uneasy when I see threads on PERB about "who is the hottest (pick high-profile profession here)?" It is likely that many women who happen to have high public profiles really wouldn't want their physical attributes discussed by a bunch of pooners on this site. If they were to learn of such a discussion, it might feel somewhat like being stalked.

I think that objective and respectful descriptions of SPs are fair in the review sections. Their physical attributes are part of what SPs are marketing. Such discussions of civilian women on this site, even in the lounge, seem rather disrespectful.

 

[apl16]

I get uneasy when I see threads on PERB about "who is the hottest (pick high-profile profession here)?" It is likely that many women who happen to have high public profiles really wouldn't want their physical attributes discussed by a bunch of pooners on this site. If they were to learn of such a discussion, it might feel somewhat like being stalked.

I think that objective and respectful descriptions of SPs are fair in the review sections. Their physical attributes are part of what SPs are marketing. Such discussions of civilian women on this site, even in the lounge, seem rather disrespectful.

It can be difficult being a public figure. It comes with positive and negative attention.

 

[sevenofnine]

we discussed it at work,

the guy was charged with voyeurism as the sun reported today.

I think it comes down to bad taste or lack of class.
we have all looked at women we have all talked about women and discussed them.
yeah public women might not want to be discussed in sexual way, especially on an escort review board. but you live a very public life and want the attention.
its like a women, showing some skin, and then screaming don't look at me you pervert.

you can't stop people from thinking, your on tv or live a public live, you can't stop me from having an opinion or looking.

the way I understand the law, its call a reasonable expectation of privacy.
your in public, you can't stop people from looking or even taking a picture,
but you don't expect that camera to be looking up your dress, and the picture being posted on the internet.
that is where he crossed the line.

I watched with some interest the erin Andrews thing, the sports reporter, filmed naked in her hotel room through the key hole.
first the quality was so bad, hardly worth watching, and no I didn't really run at first chance and google it to find her on the net.
only years latter, watching her on tv, and seeing her, on tv, talking about it and testifying in court.

what crossed my mind, was, perhaps im totally wrong was, not the fact that she was naked on the internet, but this guy made money off of me, I want my cut, where is my share,
that is how it struck me, the whole thing, maybe im wrong.

and I think in some ways, too, this is how the creep.ca plays out,
some guy is using an image of me, in a way I don't approve, and or with out my knowledge
the secrecy of it the sneakiness of it is freaking the girls out, like what the fuck else is this guy doing.

 

[westwoody]

There have been threads about retail clerks and cashiers. And waitresses of course.

 

[clu]

The guy was filming upskirt which is where the violation of the reasonable expectation of privacy comes in despite his victims being in public, and how he can be charged.

 

[uncleg]

The guy was filming upskirt which is where the violation of the reasonable expectation of privacy comes in despite his victims being in public, and how he can be charged.

Actually the majority was not up skirt...just women going about their daily business. Had he stayed with that, probably nothing would have happened...but he went a step beyond and it seems one of the victims was under 16.

 

[westwoody]

I bet there is all kinds of stuff on his home computer.
Maybe more charges will follow.q

We just had a manager fired for creepy.
IT found a bunch of porn on his company phone.
Something about porn makes certain guys nuts.
Not all, but some definitely.

 

[clu]

Didn't mean to imply that he only had upskirt photos nor that anything less would not make women uncomfortable, but just that the portion of photos that were upskirt are what his criminal charges come from, based on the most clear-cut violation of "reasonable expectation of privacy".

 

[sevenofnine]

here is a thought,
he was charged with child pornography charges. some of the girls were underage,

were they all on his computer or did he post underage girls, to the twitter account.
if so, wouldn't the 300 thousand or so followers, to that twitter feed be guilty of accessing child porn.

and interesting thought, I suppose you could always plead ignorance I had no idea how old she was.

 

[clu]

here is a thought,
he was charged with child pornography charges. some of the girls were underage,

were they all on his computer or did he post underage girls, to the twitter account.
if so, wouldn't the 300 thousand or so followers, to that twitter feed be guilty of accessing child porn.

and interesting thought, I suppose you could always plead ignorance I had no idea how old she was.

As I understand it his invasion of privacy charges for the upskirts he posted gave them probable cause to search his computers and the search turned up a private collection of child porn.

 

[storm rider]

Did not read a single post and my response/take on the guy is......he is a total fucking IDIOT.In this day and age of advanced technology etc why oh fucking why did this tool figure he could post this stuff on social media and not out himself and be caught.Eventually some person is going to see it and get outraged and then the investigation starts and ends quickly.The charges got added on the weekend to child pornography and now he is double fucked.

This like a darwin award for crime.It is akin to idiot drug addicts buying fentanyl KNOWING full well they will die from using it.

SR