for all those against the first past the post system - how would you like to be governed by a coalition that included the recently defeated conservatives?
just asking...
just asking...
Sure. Not all Conservatives are evil or dumb. And their voice should be represented in the governing of the country.for all those against the first past the post system - how would you like to be governed by a coalition that included the recently defeated conservatives?
just asking...
Not majorities. Being in power corrupts. A coalition would experience the same forces and infiltration by opportunists that a majority government experiences.Sure. Not all Conservatives are evil or dumb. And their voice should be represented in the governing of the country.
I would much rather a coalition over an absolute majority. Absolute majorities tend to become corrupt (in the broadest sense of the word) over time.
A very good point. Around the time of the C-36 senate hearings I started wishing that the Senate used their powers (They actually have similar powers to the Commons). They would only be right in doing so if they were more democratic.Not majorities. Being in power corrupts. A coalition would experience the same forces and infiltration by opportunists that a majority government experiences.
In fact, a majority is better because it provides clear direction, and periodically is replaced by a majority from a different group of people. That constant turnover weeds out the bad apples that inevitably accumulate. A constant coalition government would not provide that dynamic, and the bad apples would become entrenched in the system.
Have you forgotten our new PM's big showy dissolving of all Liberal senators? lol I guess we'll see how serious he was...Luckily for Justin Trudeau, Harper didn't appoint an additional 22 Senators as he could have. Since the Conservative Senators are now promising to block Liberal legislation, Trudeau can fill the empty seats and put a stop to that. He won't even have to do what Brian Mulroney did and "create" new Senate seats when the Liberals were blocking his legislation. http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/andrew-coyne-trudeau-facing-a-senate-conundrum
Coalitions can and do dissolve over time as there is movement away from a consensus or differing agendas make it harder to compromise.Not majorities. Being in power corrupts. A coalition would experience the same forces and infiltration by opportunists that a majority government experiences.
In fact, a majority is better because it provides clear direction, and periodically is replaced by a majority from a different group of people. That constant turnover weeds out the bad apples that inevitably accumulate. A constant coalition government would not provide that dynamic, and the bad apples would become entrenched in the system.
No government has been able to whip the vote of all the Senators. Harper had his own appointments vote against his legislation often. With 22 new Senators appointed by Trudeau and the Senators that couldn't support Harper despite being Conservative appointees, Trudeau should be able to pass most of his agenda. If the Senators won't vote to pass Trudeau's legislation, maybe it needs some additional work.Have you forgotten our new PM's big showy dissolving of all Liberal senators? lol I guess we'll see how serious he was...
technically what you have described is called an anarchyA participative democracy is probably the best, but difficult and cumbersome (Iceland as an example).
noun: anarchy
- a state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority.
- absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political ideal.
No. What I am describing is a system where there is a high degree of input from citizens. And Iceland and Finland are examples of where this can be seen, and I don't think either of those countries could be remotely described as under anarchy. There is still an ultimate authority, but the government is more accountable to the citizens.technically what you have described is called an anarchy
lol, the National Post is still peeved that their recommendation of Harper wasn't followed. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/c...r-takes-on-carnival-atmosphere-at-rideau-hallThe full list of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's new 31-member cabinet, in order of precedence, being sworn in today at Rideau Hall in Ottawa (with their province in parenthesis):
Justin Trudeau (Quebec) - Prime Minister, Intergovernmental Affairs and Youth.
Ralph Goodale (Saskatchewan) - Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
Lawrence MacAulay (P.E.I.) - Agriculture and Agri-Food.
Stéphane Dion (Quebec) - Foreign Affairs.
John McCallum (Ontario) - Immigration, Citizenship and Refugees.
Carolyn Bennett (Ontario) - Indigenous and Northern Affairs.
Scott Brison (Nova Scotia) - Treasury Board President.
Dominic Leblanc (New Brunswick) - Leader of the Government in the House of Commons.
Navdeep Bains (Ontario) - Innovation, Science and Economic Development.
Bill Morneau (Ontario) - Finance Minister.
Jody Wilson-Raybould (B.C.) - Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Judy Foote (Newfoundland and Labrador) - Public Services and Procurement.
Chrystia Freeland (Ontario) - International Trade.
Jane Philpott (Ontario) - Health.
Jean-Yves Duclos (Quebec) - Families, Children and Social Development.
Marc Garneau (Quebec) - Transport.
Marie-Claude Bibeau (Quebec) - International Development and La francophonie.
Jim Carr (Manitoba) - Natural Resources.
Mélanie Joly (Quebec) - Heritage.
Diane Lebouthillier (Quebec) - National Revenue.
Kent Hehr (Alberta) - Veterans Affairs, and Associate Minister of National Defence.
Catherine McKenna (Ontario) - Environment and Climate Change.
Harjit Sajjan (B.C.) - National Defence.
MaryAnn Mihychuk (Manitoba) - Employment Workforce Development and Labour.
Amarjeet Sohi (Alberta) - Infrastructure and Communities.
Maryam Monsef (Ontario) - Democratic Institutions.
Carla Qualtrough (B.C.) - Sport, and Persons with Disabilities.
Hunter Tootoo (Nunavut) - Fisheries and Oceans, and Canadian Coastguard.
Kirsty Duncan (Ontario) - Science.
Patricia Hajdu (Ontario) - Status of Women.
Bardish Chagger (Ontario) - Small Business and Tourism.
It looks like - VERY SERIOUSHave you forgotten our new PM's big showy dissolving of all Liberal senators? lol I guess we'll see how serious he was...
When Prime Minister Justin Trudeau unveiled his cabinet Wednesday, there was a notable absence: no appointment for a government leader in the Senate.
One constitutional law professor says that’s a significant change that signals a new direction, but could also present challenges for the new Liberal government.
“It certainly indicates that he’s going to stick to his plan of not having any senators in his caucus,” University of Ottawa professor Carissima Mathen told CTV’s Canada AM Thursday.
Enbridge’s proposed Northern Gateway plan is, at least for now, dead in the water after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau released a letter of instruction Friday telling his transport minister to ban oil tanker traffic on British Columbia’s north coast.
A ban would prevent hundreds of tankers each year from carrying diluted bitumen extracted from Alberta’s oilsands and piped to northern B.C. from being shipped for export overseas.
“It will mean that Northern Gateway will never happen,” said Gerald Graham, a Victoria consultant specializing in oil spills for more than 40 years.
Graham said it remains to be seen what oil and gas activities will be permitted and which communities could be affected.




