Yes, but most of the other polls are more or less consistent, but theirs is not. So, they doing something differently from the other pollsters. They all have about the same sample size, so I think that something about their sampling methodology is not the same.EKOS today says that the Harper Conservatives have lost some of the senior's vote. Since they do vote, this isn't good news for the Conservatives.
http://www.ekospolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/final_report_october_18_2015.pdf
All of the public pollsters have released their final polling for October 18 2015. There is an amazing agreement between the polls, both on the Liberal lead and on seniors voting.Yes, but most of the other polls are more or less consistent, but theirs is not. So, they doing something differently from the other pollsters. They all have about the same sample size, so I think that something about their sampling methodology is not the same.
I was hurt on ship a few years ago. It wasn't combat, but we were doing training in rough seas. The way Veterans Affairs used to work is a medical pension. They switched before I joined to the lump sum payment. If you do receive a lump sum, it's all fine and dandy. You can try to receive another lump sum in two years time. You can keep going like this, but it's not easy and the burden of proof falls solely on the person submitting the claim. If other conditions develop, you have to prove it and the process of attributing it to your time in uniform is exponentially more difficult.westwoody:
I have a friend who was very badly hurt in training. He was paid off with a lump sum and is now a mess.
Had a big argument with a co worker yesterday. She said Harper supports vets blah blah. I told her about my friend and she just did not understand at all. She kept saying he could get help but I know he has tried everything.
The ultimate insult was one counselor said it wasn't as serious as an actual combat injury so he should not expect much. Wtf? Poor guy can barely walk, but how dare he ask for help eh?
I'm not going to claim that training is just like combat. But, military training is not a cakewalk either. It most certainly is not like a typical workplace. There are also a lot of extra stresses that push people to the limit. If you want people to be combat ready/seaworthy/ready to fly, you need training that gets as close to the real thing as possible.Tugela:
Injuries in training are not combat. They are more along the lines of workplace accidents, and should be lumped together along with generic WCB incidents.
Yes it is. I served in the military as well (just not in Canada).I was hurt on ship a few years ago. It wasn't combat, but we were doing training in rough seas. The way Veterans Affairs used to work is a medical pension. They switched before I joined to the lump sum payment. If you do receive a lump sum, it's all fine and dandy. You can try to receive another lump sum in two years time. You can keep going like this, but it's not easy and the burden of proof falls solely on the person submitting the claim. If other conditions develop, you have to prove it and the process of attributing it to your time in uniform is exponentially more difficult.
If you live close to an office, there's some help with submitting claims, but VA staff have heavy case loads. The rest, those that live too far to make it to an office, have to mail claims in. Closing down 9 centres sure doesn't help veterans. Using Service Canada also doesn't help veterans. It's not the claims they typically deal with on a daily basis.
That counselor was completely out of line saying what they said. It doesn't matter if it was a combat injury or not, it's the nature of the injury and it's affect on a person that matters.
I'm not going to claim that training is just like combat. But, military training is not a cakewalk either. It most certainly is not like a typical workplace. There are also a lot of extra stresses that push people to the limit. If you want people to be combat ready/seaworthy/ready to fly, you need training that gets as close to the real thing as possible.
Incidents in the military should not be lumped together with generic WCB incidents. We're on duty 24/7. We can be called at a moment's notice to deal with whatever needs to be done. We don't get paid overtime, we don't have a union and we can't just quit if we don't like something. We're under contract and to break that contract requires a minimum of 6 months. It's not the same as a typical job.
Well, it looks like the public pollsters had this one nearly correct.All of the public pollsters have released their final polling for October 18 2015. There is an amazing agreement between the polls, both on the Liberal lead and on seniors voting.
http://www.ekospolitics.com/index.php/2015/10/deadlock-broken-liberals-surging/ (Liberal lead, more over 50 voting Liberal)
http://www.ipsos-na.com/news-polls/pressrelease.aspx?id=7031 (Liberal lead)
http://www.nanosresearch.com/library/polls/20151018 Ballot TrackingE.pdf (Liberal lead, more over 50 voting Liberal) (they actually report 4 surveys. usual 3 day rollup, Friday, Saturday, Sunday)
http://poll.forumresearch.com/data/... News Release (2015 10 18) Forum Research.pdf (Liberal lead, more over 45 years voting Liberal)
http://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/our-prediction/ http://www.mainstreetresearch.ca/canadas-choice-2015/ (Liberal lead)
The range of Liberal support reported is 38% to 40% which is all majority territory and Forum's seat distribution prediction is for a Majority Liberal government.
So, the EKOS poll is consistent, it was just the first released this evening. There is supposed to be an EKOS seat distribution prediction released tomorrow morning, but I won't see it until the counting is all done.
Up until today, it was looking like the Conservatives could still slide into a minority government. I don't think that is possible now. In fact, I think the Trudeau Liberals are on their way to a Chretien style Liberal victory. Large Liberal Majority government. The Conservatives appear to have worn out their welcome and the NDP has just been steamrollered. The only beneficiary other than the Liberals is the Bloc who will be regaining seats temporarily held by the NDP.
If the Liberals are rewarded with 170+ seats, the Conservatives probably will be Official Opposition, the Bloc will probably be the third party and the NDP will be the fourth party. That's because the Liberal win will mostly be at the expense of the NDP who were already losing seats to the Bloc.
I think that the internal polling of the Conservatives and NDP reflects what the public pollsters are picking up. Both Harper and Mulcair were showing desperation as they did their events today.
Trudeau on the other hand was talking Majority as he asked for people's support today.
The amazing thing is that EKOS is owned and run by connected Liberals. If they have a bias, one would expect it to be towards the Liberals. So, I don't know if they were overcompensating or if their polling system is screwed up - but they were wrong by too much during the federal election. Now, they release a self-serving "retrospective" and make a bullshit claim that they were the most accurate. Remember in 2011 they were also wrong http://www.ekospolitics.com/index.php/2011/05/a-brief-post-mortem-on-polling-election-41-may-3-2011/ They didn't see the effect of the "NDP Wave" and their May 3, 2011 "post mortem" is also bullshit.Most of the regular pollsters were pretty close, except for Ekos, who were consistently putting the Cons as stronger than they really were. When you have a situation were everyone is coming up with more or less the same numbers except for one guy, who have to think that bias was affecting what that guy was reporting.
... But when the Governor General mentioned electoral reform, a chill will have run along the Conservative side of the Senate looking for a spine to run down.
The government will take actions to ensure the 2015 general election was the last conducted under the first-past-the-post voting system, Johnston said.
The repeated commitment to look at the prospect of electoral reform, specifically use of a preferential ballot system, represents an existential threat to the Conservative Party of Canada. It’s a sleeper issue that could dramatically change the complexion of politics in this country.
Justin Trudeau has made no secret of the fact that he wants to change the way we elect governments in Canada.
He has promised to bring in electoral reform legislation within 18 months of forming government, with preferential balloting being his personal preference. ...
Since the Trudeau Liberals would not have formed a government under Proportional Representation, I doubt that PR has a lot of support with the Trudeau Liberal Government.... The reason this is such a hazard for the Tories is that brokerage parties like the Liberals do exceedingly well under ranked ballots.
Parties that polarize voters and are rarely picked as second choice, like the Conservatives, fare badly.
Under the ranked system, voters make first, second, third and subsequent choices. If no candidate receives a majority on the first ballot, the last place candidate falls off the list and his or her second choice votes are counted. This continues until one candidate receives more than 50%.
Since the Conservatives were as popular as halitosis with much of the electorate, the threat is obvious.
A poll for the Broadbent Institute by Abacus Data released this week suggests how the October election may have looked under a preferential ballot system.
In October, the Liberals won 184 seats with 40% of the vote. Under a ranked or preferential ballot system, the poll suggested they would have added 33 seats, making big gains in British Columbia and Ontario.
The Conservatives won 99 seats with 32% of the vote under the current system but would have seen their seat count fall to 66 under a ranked ballot system.
The NDP would have added six seats to the 44 won in October; the Bloc Québécois would have lost six; and the Greens would be stuck at one seat. ...
I'm sure that we will end up with an Electoral System that ensures that each MP has 50% +1 of the vote in her/his Electoral District. But I'm betting on Preferential or Ranked Ballots as our new Electoral System.... Abacus also looked at a straight division of seats on a proportional basis, where seats are divvied up according to the share of votes won by each party in each riding. PR was not nearly so favourable to the Liberals — under which they would have won 136 seats, well short of a majority. In this scenario, the Conservatives would have won nine more seats; the NDP would have gained 23 ridings; the Bloc would have added five; and the Greens a further 10 seats. ...
That isn't fair. It would be more accurate to say that the Liberals have the leader the NDP would like. That is why they have bled so much support to the center.The polling just get's worse for the Conservatives and NDP. Forum just released a Poll that shows that if the election was held now, The Liberals would win 240 seats, the Conservatives 91 seats and the NDP 6 seats. Boy, what a great leader Thomas Mulcair is! My brother in law told me when Mulcair won the NDP leadership that he would decimate their support. And he has.
Forum Poll: http://poll.forumresearch.com/post/2460/trudeaus-popularity-stays-high






