Peter MacKay quits: good riddance to bad rubbish!

phreak

Banned
Oct 3, 2007
367
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/peter-mackay-set-to-confirm-he-won-t-seek-re-election-1.3092480

The fascist arrogant self-righteous corrupt scum is leaving politics, but his legacy remains. And the issue of his legal prosecution still remains as well.

I'm surprised that so called opposition have never come up with this idea. Isn't it something expected? You can't just retire as the mastermind of the first inherently persecutory law in the modern Canadian history and get away with it. Make no mistake that the fact of Bill C-36 passing the Parliament procedure makes it legit. I would say this fact alone makes the Parliament look not so legit. But prosecution of Peter MacKay could fix this issue...
 

Lo-ki

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2011
4,022
2,654
113
Check your closet..:)
I am sure he's worried....NOT....with a FAT pension ....what does he care.
 

westwoody

Well-known member
Jun 10, 2004
7,746
7,386
113
Westwood
Dbl post plz delete
 
Last edited:

westwoody

Well-known member
Jun 10, 2004
7,746
7,386
113
Westwood
I am sure he's worried....NOT....with a FAT pension ....what does he care.
He will be a partner in a high priced law firm, and throw in a bunch of seats on boards where he gets a nice cheque for showing up one day a month and an annual meeting. Just like pretty much every ex PM.
He will be making so much his pension will be irrelevant.
 

phreak

Banned
Oct 3, 2007
367
0
0
He will be a partner in a high priced law firm, and throw in a bunch of seats on boards where he gets a nice cheque for showing up one day a month and an annual meeting. Just like pretty much every ex PM.
He will be making so much his pension will be irrelevant.
Correct. But legal prosecution may prevent this scenario: criminal record and possibly jail time won't make him a good asset for anyone. Besides that, he obviously sucks as a lawyer - Bill C-36 has so many fundamental contradictions that a first year legal student would probably do better than that!
 

phreak

Banned
Oct 3, 2007
367
0
0
Govt will always find amendments to the law making them exempt from prosecution
Deliberately persecuting knowingly innocent people based on bizarre extremist ideology, and knowingly abusing authority / violating Charter of Rights in order to do so can only be qualified as a crime. That's exactly what Hitler started doing when he was legitimately elected. History repeats itself...
 

Tugela

New member
Oct 26, 2010
1,913
1
0
There is an election due in October, the next government will most likely be a Liberal/NDP coalition and he knows it. He will no longer be a cabinet minister, just an ordinary MP, and that loss of power doesn't interest him.

That is the reason he quit. I imagine that there will be quite a few more from the current crop that does the same before too long.
 

morementum

Member
Aug 22, 2012
787
13
18
Deliberately persecuting knowingly innocent people based on bizarre extremist ideology, and knowingly abusing authority / violating Charter of Rights in order to do so can only be qualified as a crime.
You are describing precisely what life would be like if Mulcair gets remotely close to having influence to governance even in an unholy alliance with the hair that is disguised as a Trudeau.
 

phreak

Banned
Oct 3, 2007
367
0
0
You are describing precisely what life would be like if Mulcair gets remotely close to having influence to governance even in an unholy alliance with the hair that is disguised as a Trudeau.
I have no illusions or high hopes about the baby Trudeau or Mulcair the Clown, but what is really shocking is that Canada seems to be the country of extremists: it has three major political parties, but no matter which one you vote for, you'll be supporting either fascist fanatics or organized crime or useless opportunistic losers.

That's why I believe the emphasis should be on prosecution of obviously serious criminality like in case with Peter MacKay, not on fighting with it by political means. Canada is not a democratic country per se, and has never been: its election system and political structure are inherently unfair - so fighting crime by political means is not really an option and is not the right tool anyway.
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,652
839
113
I have no illusions or high hopes about the baby Trudeau or Mulcair the clown, but what is really shocking is that Canada seems to be the country of extremists: it has three major political parties, but nor matter which one you vote for, you'll be supporting either fascist fanatics or organized crime or useless opportunistic losers.

............and you'll be voting for...????????????
 

phreak

Banned
Oct 3, 2007
367
0
0
There is an election due in October, the next government will most likely be a Liberal/NDP coalition and he knows it. He will no longer be a cabinet minister, just an ordinary MP, and that loss of power doesn't interest him.

That is the reason he quit. I imagine that there will be quite a few more from the current crop that does the same before too long.
 

Equity Market investor

energy sector
Apr 9, 2009
1,310
625
113
Regardless of who steps aside etc....this conservative bully party will NOT be getting my vote this coming election. Damage is done! They seem to be a nagging inch that never goes away! !

Sadly, the unfortunate seed has been put in place and I'm not sure it can now be removed...?
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,652
839
113
I'm going to boycott the upcoming federal elections, and suggest every responsible Canadian citizen to do the same.

..........you consider that "responsible"??? What does that kind of "responsibility" prove, or accomplish ?
 

phreak

Banned
Oct 3, 2007
367
0
0
..........you consider that "responsible"??? What does that kind of "responsibility" prove, or accomplish ?
Well, the least you can do is not support the system, which is inherently unfair, by participating in it and playing by its rules.
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,652
839
113
Well, the least you can do is not support the system, which is inherently unfair, by participating in it and playing by its rules.
Yet you continue to live here and pay taxes..................
 

phreak

Banned
Oct 3, 2007
367
0
0
Yet you continue to live here and pay taxes..................
Right, but I don't see any contradiction - if enough responsible citizens stop supporting the system, it will simply collapse. But I will clarify why I object to any participation in the upcoming federal elections.

For example, you and me want (just like the majority of Canadians) to get rig of the Conservative government, so you vote for Liberals, and I vote for NDP. We both sincerely believe that because we did NOT vote for Conservatives, our votes will definitely decrease their chances of forming the next Government. In reality the opposite will likely happen: since we voted for different parties, due to the vote splitting any of them may still get less votes than Conservatives. So as long as Conservatives get more than 38%, they can form the Government, and a bit more than 40% will allow them to form the 'majority' Government. Who cares that 60% or so voters did vote against them - they are still 'democratically' elected. And don't ask me how slightly more than 40% of votes can give you the majority - Canadians seem to have very low math grades in school.

This is not a democracy: it goes against the basic ancient law of any democracy - the rule of the majority. Canada's election system is obviously flawed and fraudulent, but the so called Opposition don't object it either. The possible reason for that - all three major political parties are the parties of extremists: it's very hard for them get overwhelming support, and they just find it easier to take advantage of the fraudulent election system hoping that sooner or later they will be on top and get their piece of the pie. None of the three major parties are truly conservative, liberal or social democratic. Instead we have fascist lunatics, mobsters and uneducated leftist demagogues. They do not have any intentions of representing Canadians - all they do is pursue their sectarian agenda.

In addition to that the most powerful politician (the Prime Minister) is not even directly elected. Why would you allow a person who at best got the majority of votes in his/her tiny riding to rule the entire country? Isn't it insane? To understand how insane it is lets recall the last BC provincial elections. Provincial elections mirror the federal system, so this would be identical on the federal level. The current BC premier Christy Clark failed elections in her own riding, forget about the province. Nobody wanted her, not even her own voters. Still she managed to become the BC Premier though she comes across as a village idiot and a puppet of foreign and domestic organized crime.

Why would you voluntarily participate in this insanity? Especially if you know your vote will likely do exactly the opposite of what you expect? The only solution I can imagine is to boycott the fraudulent and unfair system altogether.
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts