Even allowing the Maldives claims might be true, it still doesn't mean an international criminal cover up. In fact this article says the Maldives authorities were contacted:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ng-plead-investigators-visit-share-story.html
"The Maldvies National Defence Force released a statement in March last year which denied that there had been any aircrafts in the area at the time of the disappearance, which locals have branded as an attempt to hide the limitations of their radar facilities."
As cover ups go, this is way more believable than some deliberate multinational covert hijacking. So if you want to entertain conjecture, there are still numerous more mundane explanations. The international consortium could've been misdirected by CYA incompetence of the Maldives military not some crazy inexplicable James Bond plan to steal a plane and its passengers.
And the article does indicate locals were consulted by the media. Whether it was just in print and not on TV is really of little consequence.
But conspiracy theorist mentality can work both ways. For example, I could say "how can it be that so many people say they saw it but with cell phones etc. today no video evidence?" (We're not talking fishermen and mud huts here. They interviewed a local "IT professional".)
This avenue of thought is pointless. It's evidence only that we don't know everything, not that there's a cover up. Not knowing everything is the normal human condition. People have an overconfidence in the media's accuracy and the government's ability to execute an evil plot flawlessly. Considering how incompetent the government is at most things it astonishes me that people can expect them to suddenly be so perfect when it comes to pulling off something fiendishly complex. It boggles the mind.
It's really getting routine: if I bring up any controversial topic or voice an opinion which may not be mainstream, comments like that follow. You forgot to mention trolling though...Someone is off their meds again....
You are absolutely right from philosophical standpoint. But in this particular case we are talking about routine investigation procedures which are supposed to be followed and for some strange reasons were not followed.I'll say it one last time: You won't accept there could be more mundane explanations for "what we know" (more like what we don't know). You ascribe it to a flawlessly executed international conspiracy with no motive for stealing a conspicuous plane and its passengers when such a theoretical mastermind could've come by a plane and 200 bodies more discretely and cheaply. And still these people with limitless power and resources couldn't fake a find? You presume every action and choice is deliberate rather than the result of incompetence. You presume the plane would be found when evidence in the past says it can take years despite our technology. And how would no one (e.g. the Russians) have the technology to poke holes in this with their own surveillance? All these things require an irrational leap of logic.
Sometimes I think people leap to conspiracy theories because the truth is even more scary: we can't know everything, no one does, and that will never change. Maybe it's comforting to think someone is in control because then random things don't happen and you can fix it by exposing those in control.
Maybe it'll turn up in a few years like that French plane. In the meantime I've spent as much time on this as I'd like. (And yeah I didn't reply to all your points because I know how these conversations go. Every counterpoint yields two more and the whole conversation becomes a novel.)
The issue is not that all the details of the criminal investigation have not been released to the general public, but that the authorities simply refuse to conduct the proper investigation (e.g. interviewing witnesses, recovering victim's remains). Instead they have been deliberately trying to mislead the public for more than a year wasting 100 million of taxpayers dollars in the process.And thus you have provided the most reasonable explanation as to why your conjectures of a conspiracy are wrong.
I don't know in what world the people conducting a criminal investigation release all the details of the information that they are gathering to the general public as the investigation is underway. I have never seen this in the world that I live in.
OMG, I'm amazed that yu'all are still dickering over what happened to flight MH370.
Me - being well educated and highly intelligent, follow world news in much more depth that any of you folks do, who seem to be more interested in who got f*cked by who, who is available to get f*cked, and for how much, ----- than gathering some knowledge of what is actually happening in the world.
I've studied a broad, ..............or 2 or 3, and I religiously read escapefromstress's news reports each and every morning.
Having full knowledge of what happened to MH370, I'll share some facts with you.
The leader of North Korea, Kim Jong UN, had the plane hijacked, and ordered the hijackers to land it on a specially designed North Korea aircraft carrier that could handle the landing of that huge Boeing 777....All the passengers were forced to go for a long walk on a short plank in shark infested waters. The same day they painted the Boeing in the colours of the North Korean Air Force with military insignias, and then flew it from the carrier to an air force base just outside of Pyongyang, where it was put into a huge hangar.
The next few month were spent to completely rip out the interior, and re-design and build 12 very luxurious suites, utilizing the passenger area as well as the cavernous freight section. All of these 2 level suites equaled any 5 star hotel suites one could imagine, and would serve Kim Jong UN as a flying whore house.
After many inspections and changes to the design by Kim Jong UN, he finally approved all the suites in late April of this year. All that was left to do was to now stock those suites with the sexiest, most gorgeous women in the land. Women that would obey orders for sexual fantasies without hesitation.
So, he called his Defense Chief, General Hyon Yong Chol, and told him to find about 25 of the most beautiful women enlisted in the army, and to re-assign them to the flying whore house.
Well, General Chol was slightly less than enthused about the request from Kim Jong.....Kim Jong left the room, and within minutes General Chol was arrested.
Two days later he was executed in public at a military school with an anti-aircraft gun. Kim Jong wanted to save the expense of a funeral, and an anti-aircraft gun would ensure that there was nothing left of a body to bury..... (And the moral of that is --- don't fuck with a guy that wants to get fucked.)
So, in the 2 weeks since that execution, the jet is now fully stocked with lovelies ladies, and Kim Jon is anxiously awaiting the maiden flight with all those maidens.
They even painted the tail of the jet with Kim Jong's personal avatar --------- a very small rooster------------- signifying a very small cock.
So there you go, now you all know 'The rest of the story'....and you can stop arguing about what happened to MH370.
Well, it's no more idiotic than all the crap you've been posting throughout this thread...... As a matter of fact, it's all your laughable 'facts' that were instrumental in motivating me to write my sarcastic post.I don't think that making idiotic fun of this tragedy is a smart thing to do...
There is nothing 'idiotic' in the 'crap' I've been posting: the doubts in the official 'handshake' theory are absolutely reasonable, and my previous post has provided more info on that. It's actually exactly the other way around: only 'idiots' can believe in a bizarre tabloid-like unproven theory about some vague 'handshake' calculations as a 'solid' proof. Governments likely have sinister motives to 'trust' this theory and waste money, but this is not an excuse for you not to use your brain.Well, it's no more idiotic than all the crap you've been posting throughout this thread...... As a matter of fact, it's all your laughable 'facts' that were instrumental in motivating me to write my sarcastic post.
But, phreak, at least I can claim that there is one actual fact mentioned in my post --- which is more than I can say about your 'fantasies'---- and that is that Kim Jong UN's Defense Chief. Generak Hyon Yong Chol, on Kim Jong's order, was executed at the end of April by a anti-aircraft gun in public at a military school.
BTW, phreak, I'm always struggling with the proper pronunciation of your handle ------ and all I ever come up with is 'freak' --- . And now, after reading your posts, I think I may be bang on..![]()
It's been more than a year since it happened, but the mystery is still unsolved. Or is it? Of course we don't know what happened exactly, but we definitely know much more than a year ago. So what do we know for sure?
- MH370 never crashed into the ocean, otherwise some debris would have been already washed ashore somewhere. Remember lots of debris from Japan showing up on BC coastline within months after the earthquake? Same is true about huge wide-body jets: no debris within a year ANYWHERE - no crash. (http://time.com/3826131/mh370-malaysia-airlines-missing-jet-stop-search/), (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/16/mh370-search-may-be-in-the-wrong-place-again.html)
- MH370 has never been flown to the Southern Indian ocean - the area of the year long search. The credible evidence that it was flown over the Maldives existed a year ago, but was quickly dismissed with no reasonable explanations provided. Local residents saw a big passenger plane with white body and red stripes of Malaysia Airlines flying unusually low on the day MH370 went missing. Obviously the plane landed somewhere not far from that area due to fuel limitations. Strangely that evidence was ignored completely and mass media didn't even bother with any independent investigation. (http://www.maldives.com/destination...-flight-mh370-sighted-flying-low-maldives/542).
- Instead a new extremely unreliable evidence suddenly appeared - Inmarsat 'handshakes'. These calculations have never been seriously questioned or independently verified, but deemed credible and convincing enough to spend tens of millions of taxpayers dollars (and keep doing so) to search for the plane in the knowingly wrong area. But that 'evidence' was very handy to make sure nothing would be found. (http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/malaysia-a...umed-flight-path-says-marine-surveyor-1497043)
So why would a few governments deliberately waste millions of dollars? The only explanation is that they are directly involved in the crime (kidnapping and possibly premeditated murder of 239 people), and covering it up is needed at any cost. Whoever committed that crime, precisely calculated everything except witnesses in the Maldives and no debris washed ashore within a year. And no media outlet bothered with independent investigation though the case is so high profile. Why is that? It's not too late though to follow the true leads, solve the crime and possibly rescue some of the passengers if they are still alive.