at least it seems that he understands that there are other laws for protecting people....the fight against the nordic model is pretty huge, has heavy hitters and is based in reality not radical feminist ideology....that said, i am still worried.....they clearly didn't read my letter....
Dear Ms. Davis:
Thank you for your correspondence of February 2, 2014, concerning prostitution.
As you may know, on December 20, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its decision in Bedford v. Attorney General of Canada. The Court found that three prostitution‑related provisions in the Criminal Code were unconstitutional: the bawdy house offence with respect to the practice of prostitution; the living on the avails offence; and, the communicating for the purposes of prostitution offence.
The Court suspended the effects of this decision for one year. The Government is considering a legislative response to this judgment. You may be interested to know that the Department of Justice Canada launched an online consultation, from February 17 to March 17, 2014, to seek the views of Canadians on this issue.
We are committed to ensuring that the criminal law continues to address the significant harms that flow from prostitution to communities and to those engaged in prostitution, as well as other vulnerable persons. It is important to note that a number of other Criminal Code provisions remain in place to protect those engaged in prostitution and other vulnerable persons, including procuring offences, child prostitution offences, and human trafficking offences.
Thank you again for writing.
Yours truly,
The Honourable Peter MacKay