Yvonne on EC
- Thread starter lickalot
- Start date
Unfortunately this a problem with young and new sp's. They have to figure out how many calls they can handle per day while still providing an excellent service. I have a buddy that tells me the same story. Excellent service the first time, good service the second time, very lack lust on the third visit. He's going to take a little break for a couple of weeks.
Like I said, her thighs are Muscular. They are like thick muscular (not skinny) and of perfect built. No cellulite whatsoever, just plain muscle. Those are the kind of thighs that can leg press like 150 lbs.
I was pleasant surprised by this as this is not the feature I usually look for but it was a bonus with her.
I saw Yvonne months ago when she was new to this. It was a polarizing experience that convinced me to stop looking for young new talent and instead only see established professional providers. She is the poster child for the argument that prostitution should be legalized and regulated to make it more safe for the providers and the clients. She is a naive kid bringing strange men into her private home and when I saw her, she had no knowledge of public health issues or safe sex procedures. During our session I was offered bbfs because she did not have a condom. She said it's OK because she is clean. Hosting in her apartment, she made no preparations to remove personal effects that clearly spelled out her real identity. She seems very vulnerable. I explained to her that she must never offer full sex uncovered because she and I like all of her clients, are swimming in a very dirty pool. I should have submitted this post long ago but I presumed from her popularity that she has heeded my advice about using protection.
Absolutely NUTS! Thanks for the info because she was someone I was thinking of seeing, especially after the ad with the face pics but not anymore. These are the threads that get me questioning if this "hobby" is for me anymore! Thanks for the info but I'd definitely encourage guys to report this stuff as soon as they find out. It would make me sick to find this out after I saw someone. I know some ppl are interested in bbfs but I think it's just a death wish and I'm not playing Russian roulette with my health!
The stakes are too high to trust people on their word when they say they are clean and healthy. We need a verification process. I suggest the establishment of a program that is monitored by a public health nurse. The nurse could publish weekly a list of sanctioned providers. Sanctioning would require STI testing, perhaps once per month, and an interview with the nurse to assess working conditions to ensure the provider is not being pimped or trafficked. Clients interested in safe encounters would be drawn to sanctioned providers, thereby increasing the provider's client base and creating an incentive for the provider to participate in the process.
There are good examples in other countries where prostition is managed to optimize provider safety. More needs to be done here within the current legal framework to discourage naive girls like Yvonne from exposing themselves to the hazards of anonymous internet solicitation. The internet is not going anywhere soon and prostitution will always happen so we should protect the people who choose to participate.
There are good examples in other countries where prostition is managed to optimize provider safety. More needs to be done here within the current legal framework to discourage naive girls like Yvonne from exposing themselves to the hazards of anonymous internet solicitation. The internet is not going anywhere soon and prostitution will always happen so we should protect the people who choose to participate.
A very intelligent young lady who knows the importance of playing safe. Often there are complaints about the lack of local talent - well here is talent with sweetness!! Hopefully she doesn't get too busy and overbook and rush through sessions as have some past local young ladies have done and disappear from the landscape. Repeat clients are the gravy in this business.
I agree. BBFS was never offered when I saw this lovely young lady. She is very intelligent, sweet and beautiful. These SPs have lives outside of there chosen profession and if you think intimate relationships are not part of that you are fooling yourself. Perhaps whomever they are seeing are also seeing other people? My point is that it is up to you to protect yourself. My only concern with this lovely lady is that she gets too busy and that it will become to difficult to see her. ��
I need to weigh in again on this and ask how bad is the local scene? In the past a rumour of BBFS was enough to blacklist a provider. In this instance a client who is a reliable, long term contributor to this forum, relays the experience of being offered BBFS. In response the provider admits, on this forum, that she did not handle it correctly and even apologizes for offering BBFS. Then the client warns she is ignorant of public health and safe sex procedures. In response she confirms as much when she maintains she is safe because she offers clean towels and showers, as though soapy warm water is a cure for sti's. Finally, he worries that she is vulnerable because of her indiscretion and she confirms fears by divulging even more information about her education and life plans.
Maybe she escaped all the bad things that she invited when she started this business using no protection. Now that you know, before you see her again, ask her to produce a health report.
I'll ask again, after reading shills in support, how bad is the local scene when a pretty face on a young body will trump the common sense of avoiding a dangerous encounter?
Maybe she escaped all the bad things that she invited when she started this business using no protection. Now that you know, before you see her again, ask her to produce a health report.
I'll ask again, after reading shills in support, how bad is the local scene when a pretty face on a young body will trump the common sense of avoiding a dangerous encounter?
I don't think it really hits home until its too late. I'm old enough to remember when the Aids scare came around. Then as time went on people adjusted and then just stopped thinking about it. The porn industry jumped on condom use for a while but that seems to be almost nonexistent today. This is what young people are exposed to and use to; proper education is greatly lacking.
Also we arent seeing a decrease in birth rates so clearly people are having unprotected sex; a lot of it. Even your favorite provider that is always 100 % safe is barebacking her boyfriend (s). We know how many have kids, and how many have recently has kids.
The other side is really educate yourself on the risks, the numbers, and the most susceptible. I firmly believe in protecting yourself, but don't panic so much that it ruins the enjoyment. While it is definitely possible to get an STI , the actual numbers out there are surprisingly low.
Johnny out.
Also we arent seeing a decrease in birth rates so clearly people are having unprotected sex; a lot of it. Even your favorite provider that is always 100 % safe is barebacking her boyfriend (s). We know how many have kids, and how many have recently has kids.
The other side is really educate yourself on the risks, the numbers, and the most susceptible. I firmly believe in protecting yourself, but don't panic so much that it ruins the enjoyment. While it is definitely possible to get an STI , the actual numbers out there are surprisingly low.
Johnny out.
Some of the accusations are confusing ... where does she admit to doing bb?
She states : I DO NOT do bbfs."
Like others have stated, the onus is just as much on the client to protect himself. Some fellow-pooners will carry condoms with them and there have been instances where a lady will ask the client on the phone to stop for some on the way to see her. Wonder what motel-user did when she had no condom, have his own? or take 'advantage' of her willingness for risk in order to make some money in her early start in this profession? Also confused why the sudden urge to criticize and attempt to destroy her credibility, as he states "In the past a rumour of BBFS was enough to blacklist a provider".
I do not think blacklisting will happen here, not to such a local sweetie. I am of the same opinion as Sir Lickalot, that she will get too busy for some of us to book at times convenient to us. Hope she heeds our warning that greed can make a lady overbook and when that happens quality of service decreases even if they do not intentionally want that to happen. She states that safety procedures are 110%, so that concern should not be an issue and reviews will inform us if quality of service, QOS, remains constant. It will be the repeat clients that can testify to this. We can assume that the blacklister is unable to get a repeat session.
She states : I DO NOT do bbfs."
Like others have stated, the onus is just as much on the client to protect himself. Some fellow-pooners will carry condoms with them and there have been instances where a lady will ask the client on the phone to stop for some on the way to see her. Wonder what motel-user did when she had no condom, have his own? or take 'advantage' of her willingness for risk in order to make some money in her early start in this profession? Also confused why the sudden urge to criticize and attempt to destroy her credibility, as he states "In the past a rumour of BBFS was enough to blacklist a provider".
I do not think blacklisting will happen here, not to such a local sweetie. I am of the same opinion as Sir Lickalot, that she will get too busy for some of us to book at times convenient to us. Hope she heeds our warning that greed can make a lady overbook and when that happens quality of service decreases even if they do not intentionally want that to happen. She states that safety procedures are 110%, so that concern should not be an issue and reviews will inform us if quality of service, QOS, remains constant. It will be the repeat clients that can testify to this. We can assume that the blacklister is unable to get a repeat session.
This reads like she started up naive to say the least and admits it in a round about way. Hopefully Yvonne has this business figured out now. None of us know what goes on in any providers civilian life.
The lady is showing her intelligence and understanding and the accusations by some past client is exactly that, in the past!
Johnny D is not saying this lady has a bf and does bb in her personal life but is stating a fact about some of the young providers that have let some of us clients know about personal experiences and how their 'mate' demands certain privileges.
Maybe this thread should be closed and a proper review thread started that is unbiased.
Let's get back on track
Agreed! This thread has drifted too far from the starting point. Let's focus on quality of service, and leave the lady's personal life and history out of our discussions.
Maybe this thread should be closed and a proper review thread started that is unbiased.[/QUOTE]
I personally find this thread extremely important and informative. I don't think it needs to be taken down! I'm not trying to hate on Yvonne and I'm happy she seems to have figured out the business a bit better but I personally believe that there is no excuse for not providing condoms and offering bbfs because of it (I know she's not doing it anymore). I personally will not see her based on this info and others have the right to this info in the future to make up their mind as well.
I personally find this thread extremely important and informative. I don't think it needs to be taken down! I'm not trying to hate on Yvonne and I'm happy she seems to have figured out the business a bit better but I personally believe that there is no excuse for not providing condoms and offering bbfs because of it (I know she's not doing it anymore). I personally will not see her based on this info and others have the right to this info in the future to make up their mind as well.
