I've edited it if it makes you feel better even though it still shows on a couple other quoted posts.“he shouldn’t of done it”
>proceeds to repost her location from the previous deleted comment
I've edited it if it makes you feel better even though it still shows on a couple other quoted posts.“he shouldn’t of done it”
>proceeds to repost her location from the previous deleted comment
You called me out for posting something that still exists on this thread which I pointed out to you.Love the attitude. Also it ain’t about how I feel there, boss.
She was new, and we don't know how familiar she was with this board. May have taken a week for her to hear about it.The post outing her area was idiotic but has anyone confirmed why she suddenly opted to retire? If it's due to the post, it's understandable but the lag between the two was about a week. I hope that it's nothing serious and that she's ok.
She retired get over it, end this thread already.
Very well said Ed.In addition to what's been discussed above, I think "Do Not Review" should be the default policy for everyone, MP and SP, until you get permission to do otherwise. Until then just stick to necessities - things relating to safety, legitimacy, fraud, cleanliness, location, general experience etc. Imagine how disconcerting it could be for someone new to the industry (or not) discover reviews outlining in graphic detail what happened in an encounter? What if this person is also using the job as an opportunity to explore their own sexuality, only to discover those experiences shared in public, rated and critiqued, and viewed by hundreds? In terms of services offered, if it's not advertised assume it doesn't exist.





