HollybabyThe other things..well said:And advocating to do away with Age of Consent laws is really going to help your case![]()
Sonny Burnett™ said:Yes I would take a polygraph test.
Sonny Burnett™ said:Wait, no I would not take a polygraph test.
Sonny Burnett™ said:Hey Big Brother, FUCK you and your lie detector test.
Marvin said:I'd be interested to know what your GPA in high school was, your current GPA in university (that is if you are currently attending) and what your LSAT score is, if you have already written it.
Hollybaby said:Hmm, they don't calculate GPA for high school, or at least not the one I went to. But I got As in everything except art(B) and physics (C+)
My current GPA is 3.8, and I'm on the Dean's List.
OK, here it is.50 Mile Radius said:I am waiting for the earth shattering "KA-BEEPING"![]()
What high school doesn't calculate GPA?? How did you apply to university without a GPA? Were you home schooled?Hollybaby said:Hmm, they don't calculate GPA for high school, or at least not the one I went to. But I got As in everything except art(B) and physics (C+)
That's pretty good - where do you go, Compu College.Hollybaby said:My current GPA is 3.8, and I'm on the Dean's List.
I suppose you may do well in the reading and comprehension category but based on your posts, I would have to say that your challenge will be in scoring high in the analytical reasoning and logical reasoning categories. So, if you maintain that 3.8 GPA (provided that your university is a reputable one), then you would probably need to score in the 90th percentile to have a legitimate shot at entering law school. Oh, don't forget the references - and by that I mean from people who are somewhat known and respected.Hollybaby said:I haven't taken the LSAT, I'm not done my BA yet! I've still got 2 years to go before I do that.
BTW, lawyers and judges don't make the laws, they just interpret and enforce them. Politicians make laws. Strike one - from the getgo, your approach is flawed.Hollybaby said:The other things..well, getting rid of the bawdy house laws, solicitation laws, and all that other crap.
Hollybaby said:Marvin, why are you going out of your way to try to prove that I am stupid?
As for my high school, it was a private school. I have no idea what kind of transcripts they sent to the universities I applied to. All I know is, they never gave me the GPA. I'm sure I could figure it out if I added it up.
I don't go to "Compu College" whatever that is. But I am not telling you where I go to school, that's for sure.
"analytical reasoning and logical reasoning categories."
Oh really? I suppose that's why I got 96% in Symbolic Logic last term...
"Oh, don't forget the references - and by that I mean from people who are somewhat known and respected."
I'm sure the people I know on the BC Civil Liberties Association and my philosophy professors will do just fine.
" lawyers and judges don't make the laws, they just interpret and enforce them. Politicians make laws. Strike one - from the getgo, your approach is flawed."
Yes, but lawyers can present constitutional challenges, which is another way that laws can get changed/struck down.
To finish up, I don't know you, and I don't know why you're set on making me look bad. As far as I know, I've never done anything to you or insulted you.
I do well in school, I'm passionate about what I believe in, and I'm kind to people. What's your problem with me exactly?
50 Mile Radius said:a single.......would.........be ....................ONE.......Twirly
a double......would.........be.....................TWO......Twirly's
and a triple..............would............be............................(c'mon Marv, you anwser this one for the class...........you can do it.......c'mon now.......)....
I'll buy you a beer if you get it right......
how bout you sleep on it and get back to us? mmmmkaaayyyyyyy?






