I do, but you keep proving that you do not. You state that anal sex is 100 times more likely to transmit HIV than vaginal sex, which is a complete an utter lie and I challenge you to quote where you got that piece of crap from. What you are likely misreading is that *unprotected* anal is more risky than *protected* vaginal sex. As anyone with a brain knows, the risk of transmission is equal for all people using a condom as the rates for the condom breaking are equal regardless of how it is used. You are comparing apples and oranges, which makes you an idiot with no clue as to what you are trying to say.
Funny, you previously stated het women have a higher rate of infection than het men...how is that possible if they "just won't go for it"? Regardless, I still find it amusing that you are tying the transmission to the fact they are gay and not to the real fact that THEY ARE PROMISCUOUS! Please note that transmission rates among monogomous gays is in line with monogomous hets, so your assertion that being gay makes you higher risk is totally groundless. The fact that they are gay has nothing to do with it....it is unprotected sex with multiple partners that is the problem. Again, you are shifting the numbers to defame a group for no other reason than bias instead of stating the true story told by the numbers.
You're guessing? Didn't you read the numbers? Rates of transmission through drug use for black males is on par with hispanics and within statistical deviations of whites (black females are even half the rate of white females in drug use transmission) . It is the het sex category that push blacks upward in the stats (especially in women where the transmission through het sex is almot triple that of drug users). Why is that? It has always been an easy conclusion for statisticians because it i the same reason as in the third world: poverty leading to lack of education and resources. Again, the root cause is not getting condoms to people and teaching them the risks through education programs. Actually, if you combine the numbers for black men and women, the het sex transmission numbers are higher than all other factors. Do you know why? Promiscuity again....black men screwing multiple girls and being too cool to wear a condom.
There are studies done on this exact thing. It is the reason for people claiming BBBJ is safe because HIV is destroyed by stomach acid, but they fail to also say the study goes further to state that transmission through open wounds (as with sores and gingivitis). Of course, you can't wrap your head around the fact that gays are no more at risk than hets in respective categories of promiscuity, so I don't expect you to understand any of this either. If anyone else is curious, these reports get quoted every month or so on TERB.
Unless you are trying to say that HIV/AIDS is transmitted through unprotected sex acts and needle sharing caused by two key factors of 1) lack of resources for protection and 2) lack of education as to the risks, then we are in no way agreeing. The breakdowns by race only tell you where the two key factors are most prevalent and more effort required in getting more condoms out there and more education.
PiL
