see graph# 4: what women meanThis may come as a surprise to you, but they say the same thing about men.
geez , you beat AnitaThis may come as a surprise to you, but they say the same thing about men.
And what makes you think you are right and they are wrong? After all, that is exactly what you are accusing them of.see graph# 4: what women mean
Yes, there's a companion video by the same guy, and explains why.This may come as a surprise to you, but they say the same thing about men.
jeez max - you made a funny... and a good one too. well done!!I have not found then to be a pain in the ass . as long as they use the stap-on the right way .. LOL
Actually they're more of an inspiration for me. Different folks, different strokes. :nod:I would agree 100% that women are a huge pain in the ass for men.
But not necessarily for the reasons he has outlined.
I used to have a woman friend who was openly bisexual, one day we got on the topic of her dating life. I'd assumed she spent roughly 50% of her time dating men, turns out she spent 80% of her time dating men, so I assumed she preferred men.And what makes you think you are right and they are wrong? After all, that is exactly what you are accusing them of.
The thing is, men (or women for that matter) might be straightforward with friends, but when they are dealing with someone they are intimate with, the rules change. It becomes awkward. You don't say what you mean, even if you think you are. So, you might say to your buddies, "hey, you know me! I'm allways upfront right?" and they might agree with you. Problem is, you don't behave the same way with women, especially ones you are trying to trick into having sex with you. It all starts out that way and relationships follow on from that, but typically with a deeply dysfunctional level of communication stemming from that initial need to initiate a relationship.
Exactly. She was using her male friends for sex only, there was minimal relationship so all was good. Women on the other hand, those she was trying to form a relationship with, so the issues associated with that came into play.I used to have a woman friend who was openly bisexual, one day we got on the topic of her dating life. I'd assumed she spent roughly 50% of her time dating men, turns out she spent 80% of her time dating men, so I assumed she preferred men.
Turns out she prefers women
??
Her explaination: Women are too high maintenance as GFs, they say one thing but actually mean something else, they're normal 3 weeks per month then crazy for a few days, etc. Men on the otherhand are simple. Give them sex, beer, food, and sports- everybody is happy
I learned a lot that day
LOL too funny.
Why spend time on someone you need to trick into having sex with you? Is it not better spent with someone who wants to be intimate with you? Also, this stereo type is repeated more by married men than single guys out on the prowl. Do married men have to trick their wives into having sex with them? That's not a relationship I'd want to touch with a 10 foot pole.And what makes you think you are right and they are wrong? After all, that is exactly what you are accusing them of.
The thing is, men (or women for that matter) might be straightforward with friends, but when they are dealing with someone they are intimate with, the rules change. It becomes awkward. You don't say what you mean, even if you think you are. So, you might say to your buddies, "hey, you know me! I'm allways upfront right?" and they might agree with you. Problem is, you don't behave the same way with women, especially ones you are trying to trick into having sex with you. It all starts out that way and relationships follow on from that, but typically with a deeply dysfunctional level of communication stemming from that initial need to initiate a relationship.
LOL too funny.
When it comes to male/female communication it is like this:
Women speak with a lot of subtext. The words they say aren't always what they mean, butt hey want o communicate in a way that doesn't make them appear "unladylike." At no time with men do they want to appear like they are bitches or shrews, so they communicate things like displeasure in very passive aggressive ways. They put out more non-verbal and more subtle signals in their communications with each other and with men as well.
Men are the opposite. We try to make our communications in a simple, direct, sometimes belligerent ,manner. Most of the time, the words are the message and all the body language and tone of voice and what not we use to express it is pretty self evident.
Because men communicate the way we do, we often miss the subtext of what a women communicates because we don't read into it too much. Women look for hidden meanings in our communications despite the fact there is rarely anything covert and in order to satisfy their ego, sometimes fabricate stuff to patronize themselves.
Basically, guys need to smarten up and women need to dumb it down when it comes to inter-gender relations.
Never met one....So what are your thoughts on women who communicate like a man. Direct, inappropriate, to the point. Or a woman who after an O, wants a smoke and fall alseep ? A woman who would prefer to have anonymous sex and leave the love at the door ?