why not john mccain????

luckydog71

Active member
Oct 26, 2003
1,117
0
36
76
Washington State
smackyo said:
yeah there ya go john mckain and colin powel for vice. the intelligence level as well as credibility has shot up 300%. this is odd, i'm waiting for luckydog or dittman to argue with me on these points.
Actually it is better for conservatives to lie low for a day or two. The DEMS right now are more interested in scoring political points. There are still 10,000 plus people refusing to evacuate N.O. The are 100,000's of evacuees spread all around and liberals are more interested in attacking than fixing the problem.

When liberals get that way I have found the best approach is to let them burn themselves out. They can get media attention for only so long.

So have at it smackyo....join Nancy Pelosey (sp? I do not even want to bother looking up her name), Teddy Kennedy, and the rest of the liberal screechers.
 
Jul 11, 2005
8
0
0
Since when did this board get hijacked by Bush operatives?

luckydog71 said:
Actually it is better for conservatives to lie low for a day or two. The DEMS right now are more interested in scoring political points.
You are an idiot.

It's the White House from day one who have tried to cover their asses and avoid responsibility. It's widely reproted in the press -- Karl Rove has been telling Republicans to attack others.

"the White House organized a PR effort directed by political adviser Karl Rove, master of political attack-machine tactics. The New York Times reported Monday that the administration, alarmed at the potential political fallout of its poor performance, regrouped over the weekend and mapped out its strategy. The plan has rolled out exactly as the Times' report said it would"

Not that I expect any facts to get in the way of your ideology and your repeated attempts to make us bow to your politics; I see your kind all the time in Texas.

http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/5602234.html

Minneapolis Star Tribune September 8, 2005

Editorial: Accountability/Little to be seen on Katrina
If the human misery that followed Hurricane Katrina has been shocking and painful, the federal government's shifting explanations for its needless severity have been utterly shameful.

That assessment is not part of some political, postdisaster "blame game," but an insistence that accountability for preparing for and responding to a major U.S. disaster be placed squarely where it belongs: the federal government and its emergency-response program, FEMA.

The Bush administration's attempts to shift accountability elsewhere -- first to the victims stuck in New Orleans for not leaving, later to Louisiana officials and "bureaucrats" -- are an appalling use of political tactics in the highly inappropriate realm of human suffering and pain, of lives saved and lives lost.

That realm requires that officials accept responsibility, express true and deep understanding of the dislocation and misery being experienced, and redouble efforts to make up for a sickeningly bungled start.

While efforts have been redoubled, effectiveness is still in question; genuine, deep understanding hasn't been apparent despite two presidential visits to the area. And accountability? Accepting it would involve, at the least, making clear that critical changes will be made, and rolling appropriate heads at FEMA and its umbrella, the Department of Homeland Security.

Instead, the White House organized a PR effort directed by political adviser Karl Rove, master of political attack-machine tactics. The New York Times reported Monday that the administration, alarmed at the potential political fallout of its poor performance, regrouped over the weekend and mapped out its strategy. The plan has rolled out exactly as the Times' report said it would:

Administration officials appearing in public have downplayed the need to quickly assess failures, and have tried instead to discuss what's being done now. To the extent that they -- and allies who appear or write in their stead -- do discuss failures, it is to point the finger at local and state officials or "bureaucrats." Officials doing just that include Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff, whose accountability is right up there with FEMA director Michael Brown's.

These tactics are beyond outrageous. No state, no locality can take the lead in dealing with an emergency like Katrina. That's why FEMA was created. That is why Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco declared a state of emergency on Friday, Aug. 26, when Katrina was a Category 2 hurricane. It is why the Gulf Coast states requested help from the Pentagon that same day.

It is why the next day, as Katrina was upgraded to Category 3, Blanco asked President Bush to declare a federal state of emergency in Louisiana. It was declared. Thus FEMA had full authority and responsibility from the White House "to identify, mobilize, and provide at its discretion, equipment and resources necessary to alleviate the impacts of the emergency."

Over the following week the world watched as an even more powerful Katrina hit on Monday and victims pitifully waited for help without adequate (or often any) food, health care or water. Meager boats rescued a few as doctors pleaded for aid, as newscasters struggled to share the story -- and as ships, trucks and outside aid waited, and waited, for approval to help, frequently thwarted, incredibly, by FEMA.

Exactly what went wrong, in both the planning and the response, must be assessed in short order. The ability of the United States to prepare for and respond to disaster -- whatever the origin -- is vital to its security. No less, it is critical to America's ability to honor its shared values, which include attending to the poor, the sick, the vulnerable -- the very people who suffered most from the government's incompetence last week. Yet the White House delays the reckoning while pointing fingers at others.

Incompetence is bad enough; not taking responsibility for it is shameful. Blaming it on others is a national disgrace.
 

Dutchi

New member
Jul 11, 2005
3
0
0
Would all these US reactionaries please go off and form their own board?

I propose they use the name Circle Jerks.
 

DMZNow

Banned
Jul 11, 2005
6
0
0
smackyo said:
man looking back on it now i really wish they would have voted john mccain leader of the republicans. at least that man has a grain of sense. also having been in a war himself(unlike bush)i really doubt he would have taken the u.s. to war without just cause.
i for one hope he runs for leadership again.
He was savaged by the right wing for being a prisoner of war & a coward -- no joke! -- by those "swift vote veterans" back in 2000. That's why he lost the primaries, in S. Carolina. Just like they attacked Kerry for the audacity to get wounded and win a purple heart.

Where was Bush when McCain & Kerry were fighting a stupid war?

no one really knows... but it involved a lotta beer & a lot of white powder!
 

luckydog71

Active member
Oct 26, 2003
1,117
0
36
76
Washington State
TexasTransplant said:
Since when did this board get hijacked by Bush operatives?

You are an idiot.
Hi TT welcome to the board.

You are going to find a few dozen posters have your slant on things and are experts at Bush bashing and name callings. I am sure you will fit into that group very well.

There is another much larger group that put forward some very strong positions that are left of center. The difference is they skilled in debates and put forward concise support for their positions. You would do well to read their posts and learn from them.
 

JMBrowning

New member
Sep 7, 2005
242
0
0
lenharper said:
Yeah he turned the fabled Times Square with all it's sleaze and sex into a 360 degree advertisement for the most banal that corporate America has to offer.
Anything wrong with that?
 

smackyo

pimp supreme
May 18, 2005
1,636
4
0
your mom says hi.
lol, even if i start a good thread about republicans and its kinda good it gets hijacked and taken over by "bush people" fuck sakes people the guys a moron. how could anyone in their right mind think that bush is smarter or more credible then john maccain i will never know. i kinda like both john mccain and colin powel and though i am not a rep. i would consider voting for them if i were an american.

its not republicans i hate. they have a different point of view and thats fine. bush and his cronies in my mind do not represent the republican parties pollitical leanings.
 
Vancouver Escorts