Late to the discussion... but this has been weighing on me.
I like the idea of reviewing and supporting the community, but have not written a full review as of yet. At first it was because all newbies seem to get called 'shills' if they start off writing something nice, and even the ladies I have seen that were not my absolute faves I still found enjoyable. Even my first local lady, whose unique set of restrictions seemed like a laundry list banning most everything I love to do (nothing to do with covered/bare, incidentally), was an enjoyable experience in her own right. I have no doubt she gave it her all, and I was delighted by what we did do.
I am also a bit different from the average guy. I orgasm, but often without spilling my load. Yes, guys like us do exist. It is great for keeping going, and reaching multiple orgasms, but at least a couple ladies seemed incredulous when (honestly) I told them I had orgasmed. I did. I have never lied about it.
I am also a giver - I enjoy genuinely being with a lady whom I can satisfy, whether I orgasm or not.
So put all these together, and I enjoy the experience, no matter if I cum or not. One lady had me on the edge of orgasm for possibly 10+ minutes or so (not sure how long, but it felt much longer than 10 minutes ) - I never quite did but the experience was so excruciating but also so delightful.
So it seems awkward to write up a review from my point of view when it seems so alien to what most guys experience and indeed what most ladies seem to expect, but also because I cannot get past the idea that putting certain intangibles into words will do disservice to the experience, and potentially to all involved. I started to write up a review several times (if only to brag - Talisha Cruze and Ella Will duo yesterday! Wooooo!), but no no avail. I feel completely out of step with the approach and assumptions I see in all the other reviews.
So I opted to write this.
I like the idea of reviewing and supporting the community, but have not written a full review as of yet. At first it was because all newbies seem to get called 'shills' if they start off writing something nice, and even the ladies I have seen that were not my absolute faves I still found enjoyable. Even my first local lady, whose unique set of restrictions seemed like a laundry list banning most everything I love to do (nothing to do with covered/bare, incidentally), was an enjoyable experience in her own right. I have no doubt she gave it her all, and I was delighted by what we did do.
I am also a bit different from the average guy. I orgasm, but often without spilling my load. Yes, guys like us do exist. It is great for keeping going, and reaching multiple orgasms, but at least a couple ladies seemed incredulous when (honestly) I told them I had orgasmed. I did. I have never lied about it.
I am also a giver - I enjoy genuinely being with a lady whom I can satisfy, whether I orgasm or not.
So put all these together, and I enjoy the experience, no matter if I cum or not. One lady had me on the edge of orgasm for possibly 10+ minutes or so (not sure how long, but it felt much longer than 10 minutes ) - I never quite did but the experience was so excruciating but also so delightful.
So it seems awkward to write up a review from my point of view when it seems so alien to what most guys experience and indeed what most ladies seem to expect, but also because I cannot get past the idea that putting certain intangibles into words will do disservice to the experience, and potentially to all involved. I started to write up a review several times (if only to brag - Talisha Cruze and Ella Will duo yesterday! Wooooo!), but no no avail. I feel completely out of step with the approach and assumptions I see in all the other reviews.
So I opted to write this.





