Why do men see low-priced girls?

[Katlyn]

You see, I've been reading reviews today and the reviews of the low priced girls (amp or not) are at least 50% negative. I do understand they're cheap, and that is the main draw, but honestly I am so confused by this because when I read these reviews all I think is wouldn't it be better to spend a bit more and have a great time than spend less and have a shitty time? If you can afford $300/mo only wouldn't you feel more fulfilled if you had one really great appointment vs 2 okay appointments? (or worse)

Some of the asian girls have really good reviews and they are consistently well-reviewed, so I get that part But what about all these girls that seem hit or miss? What makes a man choose to go see them and play russian roulette as it were rather than go to someone that he will have a much better chance of having a good time. Is it a thrill of seeing if you can be the one guy she services well? Or maybe you don't actually mind seeing girls you rate 6/7 and so once in a while getting a 4/5 is okay...?

Please do NOT turn this into a micro vs indy thread, or personal comments towards me or other indys about rates. This is not a thread about rates at all, I actually just really want to know because I am amazed by how many bad, or at least less than great, reviews there are of the lower priced girls. This is about my curiosity, and I would have had the same question if I were not an escort myself after reading all those reviews today.

And I know the argument that pooners feel hesitant to post negative reviews of indys on the boards because the girls are here too...but there are indys who are not on the boards that get reviewed and it is the same for all of us whether we are advertisers, posters, or not on the boards at all...the ratio of positive to negative reviews is much more favourable than the lower-priced girls.

 

[Miss*Bijou]

If 50% are negative experiences... the other 50% are positive. I would guess that for the amount they can save, those odds are okay for them. Someone please correct me if I'm off, but I've heard more than one pooner tell me that what they enjoyed about the experience, wasn't only the hour (or whatever) spent with the sp, but the whole time leading up to it. Searching for the girl, making the call, driving over, the nervousness and excitement of not knowing what to expect, to the moment when she opens the door... I think a lot of men want to relive that as often as they can, so the possibility of being able to do it twice as much is appealing.


I also think that the odds might have been a lot better and that this part of the market has changed a lot the last few months (or year?). It seems the increasing amount of competition within this market, has given rise to a lot of scams, that perhaps some of this new competition isn't always quite as focused on service which is why there are far more bad reviews now (it seems) as even a few months ago. Whether this might discourage some who may feel like the odds aren't as worth is as they were, who knows, obviously I can't answer that.


But I think everyone will tell you that paying $300/hr does not necessarily guaranty a good experience either. Even at that rate, it can be hit and miss. Only your 'miss' is a little more expensive than when you paid half that amount.


I don't know, I could be totally off about this..

 

[iluvdaty]

There is also the issue of why do men poon in the first place, I have a gf so when I poon I am looking at being with someone different, looks, sex, attitude, etc... So when I poon I like variety and if my budget was limited I would be looking at the cheaper SP so I could satisfy this desire while staying within my budget. That is my 2 bits on this topic

 

[timhorton]

I think it's because there is just a natural inclination towards deal-seeking. Everyone wants to find that gem at $160 without stopping to consider that there might be more value in spending more less often, and that by hedging bets they are probably spending more in the long run.

Also, the psychology of expending multiple disbursements of $150 is much easier to validate than a one time cost of $300. Incremental costs never seem as apparent and are much more attractive - hence car companies now advertising leases as $72 per week because $72 is less of a psychic barrier than $288, or condo developers doing similar.

Look at all the guys who get to the door, find it's a bait and switch or +40lbs or +15 years from what's been advertised, shrug, and head on in. Rationalism seems to take a back seat in this game.

Then there's that whole delayed gratification thing. Of the two sexes, I'm pretty sure it's guys who have the harder time saying "no".

 

[-Tommy-]

Huge market for $150 -$200/hr

Well, I think $300 is too much. Most of the guys are married, and hide $300 is tough. Most of the Asians do 45-60 min for $150, including a shower. I never had a bad experience, some of them do CIM, some BBBJ, some don't, every time it's different. Look on CL, there is a huge market out there for $150 - $200 /hr. I got burned in past by white, more expensive providers. They offered more then they were willing to deliver.
I think most of the guys out there will agree with me.

 

[napcodog]

Well, I think $300 is too much. Most of the guys are married, and hide $300 is tough. Most of the Asians do 45-60 min for $150, including a shower. I never had a bad experience, some of them do CIM, some BBBJ, some don't, every time it's different. Look on CL, there is a huge market out there for $150 - $200 /hr. I got burned in past by white, more expensive providers. They offered more then they were willing to deliver.
I think most of the guys out there will agree with me.

I would cast my vote in the AGREE with you.

 

[Pimmel]

Katlyn, given that you did a quick look, you said 50% were negative. At the same time, what if these pooners spent $300, it's not going to be 100% positive either. given the risk, it's a lot harder to get gyped at $300.

I see both the $300 sp as well as the $150 sp, it really depends on what i'm looking for and when.

you can liken this to something like buying a car, just because i can afford a Benz, doesn't mean i want to buy one, i'd rather get a neon knowing that it lacks in looks and mileage, but i'm able to go from a to b.

 

[BJhunter]

But I think everyone will tell you that paying $300/hr does not necessarily guaranty a good experience either. Even at that rate, it can be hit and miss. I don't know, I could be totally off about this..

Well, Katlyn, Miss bijou answers your question! For a pooning student, it's not just the $3 browns but we've all read bad reviews...so it's 'easier' to live w/ a crappy $1.5 experience than $3 bones, ouch...

that's why I envy the veterans like SS, valium, pantherdash, Quarter Miler, these guys spend the big bucks b/c they make the big bucks!!!

Role Models here? HAHHAHAAHA

 

[memyselfandI]

Certainly no gaurantees with the 'elite' either...I've had some shitty times with high-end girls who charge a ton, and had a great time with 160 dollar ladies...hit or miss.

Less hurtful when the cheaper ladies end up being a bust. Try shelling out 5 or 6 bills for a boring session with an uptight princess...not a good time.

 

[MrPeterNorth]

Maybe I'm just lucky but lately I've been seeing many caucasian girls on CL in the $150-200 range. Most are 8's in the looks department and some even 9's! For me it's never been about the money. I've seen $500/hr Heidi Starr, I've seen other HDH's... and I don't know... I just have better chemistry with the more unassuming girls on CL.

I used to be a frequenter of the Den. I haven't been in over a year now. I like the place, the girls are hot, and my mileage is usually very good also. But I just find it's all rehearsed. And when 60 minutes on the dot is up, it really is up. I'd rather meet them on an independent basis.

CL girls however, all bets are off. It's exciting because I have NO idea what to expect. Many are TOFTT's. I love the fact many want to hang out, get to know you, and THEN have fun. And the service is just as good and even better in most cases to $350/hr girls! Success rate is about 80%. Not really sure what to make of that honestly.

Ironically, the one time I go to see a low-priced CL girl based on 'stellar' reviews, it turns out to be my worst session ever. So now I go based on gut-instinct - and it's usually never wrong.

 

[Steven]

Quality does not eqaute to $$ . Spending $300 isn't going to guarantee that you'll be skipping out the door - easier to part with 1/2 that if u have a sub par session and move on - also price point for me is psychological, I wouldnt buy 3K worth of lottery tickets at once , but thats what I part with over a year .similarily spending an average of 1200 /mo on sp's- it's easier to dole that out @ $.60 per - if u find the 1 u click with, u get 8 visits vs 4 .

 

[Purrr VertIcal]

Why do people eat at McDonalds?

It's probably the same answer.
Ugh.

 

[HB40]

For me, I guess I'm not a shopper or looking to stretch my dollar. I know what I want and understand what it's worth.
I think the difference is some girls think they are good...and then there are the ones who know it.
You will meet some gems but I find the odds way better with the high class ladies. I'm not suggesting CL or others are lower standard, I'm saying the ladies that set up websites, travel, have a vested interest in the business and offer more varied and stylized sessions set themselves apart.
I've always found higher priced girls like that to have a better work ethic and take alot of pride in ensuring each session is memorable.
I'm not buying a car, I'm having incredible sex, there's no substitute!

 

[trooper69]

what a deal...

Guys like to shop around too. When we find a great deal, it's like winning the lottery. But it is a numbers game, you half a 50-50 chance of finding someone who's good at what they do.

 

[Aynia]

Just read through the 100's of reviews here, I am certain you will find many many negatives given about those in a higher price range, and don't fool yourself those in the $ 200 dollar range are not necessarily a waste of time

I always find it amusing when someone equates service to money- While at times it can be an indicator as it is in any other service industry, it is only ONE factor of many.

Personally, I am fine offering 200-hour and in fact garner more repeat business (which again is to my liking as I enjoy knowing who is coming, what they enjoy etc) those that are regulars know that I won't clock watch, I actually enjoy myself with them and there won't be any surprises on any side.

Also, I have recently added a 150-45 minutes and that is simply because there are many gentlemen out there with regular jobs that enjoy the menu of a "GFE' but don't necessarily want the extended chat time.

I don't think there is one "answer" but a multitude of reasoning and most important I really do not believe you can assume service will be a certain level based on price.

 

[trackstar]

For me, I guess I'm not a shopper or looking to stretch my dollar. I know what I want and understand what it's worth.
I think the difference is some girls think they are good...and then there are the ones who know it.
You will meet some gems but I find the odds way better with the high class ladies. I'm not suggesting CL or others are lower standard, I'm saying the ladies that set up websites, travel, have a vested interest in the business and offer more varied and stylized sessions set themselves apart.
I've always found higher priced girls like that to have a better work ethic and take alot of pride in ensuring each session is memorable.
I'm not buying a car, I'm having incredible sex, there's no substitute!

Not to mention that you feel more secure in their environment and aren't just waiting for a low-life pimp to come busting through the door

 

[FuZzYknUckLeS]

You see, I've been reading reviews today and the reviews of the low priced girls (amp or not) are at least 50% negative. I do understand they're cheap, and that is the main draw, but honestly I am so confused by this because when I read these reviews all I think is wouldn't it be better to spend a bit more and have a great time than spend less and have a shitty time? ...

It all boils down to this. A pig, by any other name, is still a pig.* A pussy, no matter what the price, is still a pussy. Just because one 'costs' twice that of the other doesn't make it smell better, or make it tighter, or make it anything more than the other one. So why pay any more for it? And you'd be kidding yourself if you believe that the $300 girls can't suck (pardon the expression) just as badly as the $150 ones. They can. And often, even more so, with more restrictions.

*This is just a common slang term. Don't read more into it than you should be, for fuk sakes!

 

[trackstar]

It all boils down to this. A pig, by any other name, is still a pig.* A pussy, no matter what the price, is still a pussy. Just because one 'costs' twice that of the other doesn't make it smell better, or make it tighter, or make it anything more than the other one. So why pay any more for it? And you'd be kidding yourself if you believe that the $300 girls can't suck (pardon the expression) just as badly as the $150 ones. They can. And often, even more so, with more restrictions.

*This is just a common slang term. Don't read more into it than you should be, for fuk sakes!

Yeah, but they don't smell like Joico my friend

 

[LittleAsianGuy]

I use to think like you did that why bother seeing 2-3 girls at 140.00. When you can get a caucasian hottie for 300/h for GFE. But then i thought what the hell and give some of these gals a try. Most of the korean gals even the bad review ones are better than the 300/h gfe caucasian sp. Infact so many of the 250-300/h gals ive seen are so crappy in terms of service and attitude. That's why so many guys are switching over. A few of the 300/h gals also have a 150.00 half a hour rate specials and I dont even bother with them. Cause the asians are so much better in attitude. Atleast most of them i've been with have better attitude than the more expensive ones

 

[Pantherdash]

For me, pooning is a luxury like drinking good wine. But I will NOT spend $300/session for said luxury just like I won't spend $300 on a bottle of wine at a restaurant. But I do believe there are people who feel better and enjoy the experience more if they spend more money on an SP or a bottle of wine. Of course they do, because they need some way of justifying spending such a ridiculous amount of money on a luxury.

I've tried both $300/hour SPs and $300 bottles of wine (thankfully someone else paid for the wine ) and really there are both levels of service and quality at all price points. I've spent $140 for 45 minutes with Ivy or Sheila and I had great times with both and plenty of memories for the spank-bank.

Likewise I tried a $325 bottle of Antinori Solaia 2003 and honestly I think I enjoyed more a $46 bottle of Marchese Antinori Chianti Classico 2001. I guess maybe it's guilt over spending so much on something so extravagant and unnecessary. It's not that I can't afford it, it's just that there are much better things in this world to spend that extra bit of money on. Especially knowing that with that extra bit of money you could also be helping so many poor families in need right here in your own backyard.

Have fun, but don't spend a STUPID amount of money doing it.

Panther