Alot of new electronic tracks are pieced together over months, some can be banged out in maybe a few days. Heard alot of interviews over the XM radio with producers/dj's. Their remixs they may do in a short amount of time, their own tracks, they labor over. Electronic equipment is no easier to use than a guitar. Nearly anyone can play a guitar, not everyone can write/create songs which have appeal. You can have all the best equipment in the world with any sample known to man, if you cant piece it together it doesn't matter.I think that my main issue with a lot of the newer electronic music is that the modern equipment makes it so easy. When you consider the weeks that Pete Townsend spent programming the synthsizer track (not composing, just programming the machine) for one song on The Who's "Who are You" album you can appreciate that an artist chose to cause every note, tone and pause in the track. A lot of the new stuff? Not so much.
Lee Perry and King Tubby! Hank knows his stuff. Tubby invented the 'remix' in the early seventies. Electronic/dance/whatever would be very different today if it weren't for him. It's safe to call dub 'electronic'.Actually, as a music lover of all kinds, I have heard a lot of electronic music I have at least found interesting. This is an example from David Pritchard, decades ago. He was a DJ in Toronto (the kind that played records on the radio) who made music as a hobby.
I have always loved classic Jamaican dub from the likes of Lee Perry and King Tubby, where the guy with the mixing console is the musician (but he is fucking around with real music on analog tapes, so I'm not sure it counts as "electronic").
I kind of liked some of the "ambient" music that Brian Eno once did, and could see what he was doing.
I have enjoyed tracks more recently (that is, the last couple of decades) from bands like Massive Attack, Morcheeba, Portishead and others of that ilk, but could never enjoy it in album-length doses.
There is probably an old fogey element to it for me too -- I also fail to get enthused about most "indy" bands that them young folks seem to like....it just seems like warmed-over versions of things I've heard before, only watered down. I also know that if things I have missed are any good, they will stand the test of time and still be there in a few years and will likely come to my attention eventually. I am still waiting for that to happen with rap...it's only been around for 30 some years, so maybe it will grow on me....
Well then, a classic "electronic" track. Augustus Pablo recorded a bunch of sessions with a great band and different singers, including his own melodica sounds (and released a number of reggae singles from them), then gave the tapes to King Tubby to screw with. This was an international hit in 1976:Lee Perry and King Tubby! Hank knows his stuff. Tubby invented the 'remix' in the early seventies. Electronic/dance/whatever would be very different today if it weren't for him. It's safe to call dub 'electronic'.
"King Tubby truly understood sound in a scientific sense. He knew how the circuits worked and what the electrons did. That's why he could do what he did".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Tubby
Oooh perhaps we'll have to argue about books next! lol.lol no worries, I take no offense whatsoever, I used to be one of the worst book snobs around lol.
Yeah there's nothing like 14 year olds high and waving glowsticks in your face to make you want to stay home lol.I prefer seeing dj's in smaller more intimate venues that don't feel like an all ages rave.![]()
If we're gonna talk dubstep, I'd take Bassnectar over Skrillex any day.....





