Carman Fox

Who does Cleo belong with?

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,042
45
48
Ladner family distraught after finding missing dog with new owner


By Jessica Kerr, The Delta Optimist January 25, 2011


A Ladner family is looking for answers after its missing dog was found years later with a new owner.

Four years ago, Jamie Gillespie got up one morning to find his basement door open and his blue-heeler cross, Cleo, gone.

He said he called the local animal shelter and put missing dog posters up around town.

Cleo had a collar as well as an ear tattoo, so Gillespie said he assumed he would be contacted if the dog was brought to a shelter.

"I just didn't know what else to do, there was no sign of her," he said.

Last week as Gillespie was driving along Cambie Street in Vancouver he spotted a familiar looking dog tied up outside the Choices Market at 19th Avenue.

He stopped, approached the dog and said he was able to identify it as the missing Cleo by the deformed claw on its left front paw, something it had since birth.

"It was her, no question," Gillespie said.

He waited outside the store for the current owner to return and when she did, he started asking her questions about the dog.

Initially, Gillespie said the woman told him she got the dog from a friend six years ago, then he said he told her that the dog was his and had gone missing from his home four years ago.

"She didn't really want to talk to me anymore," he said.

Eventually, someone called police.

Gillespie said two officers arrived to deal with the situation and after getting his information and his side of the story, he was asked to leave the area.

The officers took the dog to a nearby vet to have the tattoo checked.

Cleo's tattoo was traced back to Gillespie's vet here in Ladner, but there was some confusion over one of the letters in the coded tattoo.

The mystery deepened when the vet's office was able to trace the dog's adoption back to an animal shelter in Abbotsford.

Gillespie said the police told him there isn't anything that can be done. The woman legally adopted the dog from the shelter.

He is hoping to find out exactly what happened to his dog and would like to get Cleo back.

"I'm very distraught at how my dog ended up in Abbotsford from Ladner," he said. "I want to know how this could happen."

Gillespie said he is considering legal action.








This is a tough one, emotionally. What do you think?
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,645
828
113
Legally I'd give the dog to the original owner, provided the issue of the tattoo was cleared up properly. However, I'd think that in the best interests of the dog it should go where it's been the longest.
 

Unpossible

A.C.A.B.
Dec 26, 2008
908
13
0
Gillespie said the police told him there isn't anything that can be done. The woman legally adopted the dog from the shelter.
Considering that the dog was tatooed how legal was it for the shelter to give it away? :confused:

They obviously knew the dog belonged to somebody else or they're too stupid to run a shelter.
 

Lancaster

Member
Oct 10, 2010
73
0
6
I think they should become friends. The dog should go back to the original owner, the woman can have weekend visitation rights, and the shelter should reimburse the money she paid to adopt. That's the way I would deal with it anyways.
Tough one, since both owners love the dog and has had it for a while. Be so much easier if it was a recently adopted dog.

As much as I say the old owner should have the dog returned.... there would be less emotional pain overall if the new owner just kept the dog. After 4 years, the previous owner probably assumed the dog would have died or whatever, so they already been through the mourning process.
Knowing the dog is alive and well should be a nice "outcome" for the unfortunate situation.

Also... the adoption place should repay the party that's been "wrong"

A couple things come to mind.

1) You all know what happens to dogs in shelters who arent claimed or adopted, right? He should happy his beloved pet was adopted.
2) What kind of message would returning Cleo to the original owners send to future potential adopters? I know I would be hesitant to adopt if I knew the owner could come claim my new family member at some point in the future.

If the dog is in a safe, happy home, and everything is on the up and up, as hard as it is for the original owners the best thing to do is likely let Cleo stay where she is. However, if something unique/shady about this case is discovered, by all means return her. I am curious as to why the lady didnt admit upfront that she adopted the dog. Does she have any ties to the shelter she could have exploited to obtain Cleo illigitimately?
For #2, I don't think any prospective owners should have anything to worry about. It's someone within the adoption place that messed up. If someone did their full diligence and checked if there were any ID of any sort, this situation wouldn't have happened.

For those wanting to adopt a dog, just make sure you know the reason on how the dog end up in the pound.
 

Unpossible

A.C.A.B.
Dec 26, 2008
908
13
0
It's someone within the adoption place that messed up.
You have to ask yourself, "If the police found the vet through the tattoo. How did the vet find where the dog was adopted from?"

It wasn't a screw up. They kept the dog and sold it.
 

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,486
8
38
on yer ignore list
yes, if i was the society that funds the shelter, i would be looking up my lawyer's number about now. the shelter workers knew the dog had an owner and sold it to the new owner anyway, and the buyer obviously knew the dog had a tattoo so she knew the dog had an owner as well, but paid the money and took the dog anyway. i wouldn't be at all surprised to find out that some cash changed hands under the table as well for everybody to wink, wink, nudge, nudge, know-what-i-mean, know-what-i-mean...

its pretty obvious that i come down on the side of the original owner

one thing i have noticed is that unless the dog was abused by the original owner, they never forget the person that raised them as a small puppy, they think of them as a parent somehow
 

Trevor2136

Member
May 20, 2004
132
0
16
It sounds a bit fishy when she originally told. Him that she got the dog 6 years earlier from a friend but it turns out to be 4 years earlier. It is implied that she got the dog from the shelter but it isn't clear if she was the one who went to the shelter. If so, her actions might indicate some complicity .

Another interesting thing is how a this thread seems to lean towards the new owner. How do you feel about Ann Pettway then?
 
Vancouver Escorts