which one and why ?

[resercher]

I I have been thinking about something lately in regards to pooning and in general socially acceptable hobbies and those that are not socially acceptable. Various addictive substances excluded . Seems to me that anything to do with sex that the government or some socially acceptable institution. Does not receive a direct monetary profit from is unacceptable. For example sex toys sex dolls going to strip bars. Seeing sex service providers learning about various sex practices one night stands etc But fishing stamp collecting so called normal non sexual hobbies. Seem to be ok . given that in mind and I am interested in what people will say about a a fictional situation


you are a human resources officer at a company the job you are interviewing for. Is one that requires a university degree and a great deal of skill and expertise in the field you have two candidates

both candidates are exactly the same with a couple of non job skill related difference's .like I said this is fictional n they both lost their job due for exactly the same reason something that was beyond their control both men have houses that have been fully paid for.
1
You interview the first candidate and you find out he is a married man in his twenty's . He has a wife who he has never cheated on. Goes to a Christian church every Sunday with his family has one daughter and one boy . The daughter goes to
ringette at the local community center . The son plays hockey both children are normal . His hobbies are he is a fan of the local sports team He likes to go fishing at the lake during the summer . The marred man makes the case that he is a stable person and that he needs the money for his family.


2
The second candidate is a single man in his 20's he he has no wife or girlfriend . Does not attend any sort of religious institution and is in fact an atheist . His hobbies are once a month he likes to see a different prostitute. As he does not want to get attached to them and appreciates when they leave . He always uses protection and always gets an STI test the next day. He is a well established member of the local BDSM club He Teaches BDSM safety . He likes to go to a cabin that is close to a nude beach in the summer. . The single man tells you that since he is not tied down to anything no wife kids to look after his schedule is very flexible . With the exception of certain nights he has promised to do a BDSM safety course and when he goes to the nude beach in the summer.

both men are in good health have never lost a day of work due to sickness
so who would you hire ?

1 The marred "normal" man

2 The single heathen pervert


why would you pick the one you did no wrong answers to this question your thoughts ?

 

[clu]

As someone who's done a fair bit of hiring, I can guarantee I would continue to dig to find a more substantive and relevant way to distinguish them.

There's a counter argument for any general rule of thumb. e.g. Single people can be more available for their jobs but married people may be motivated to be more loyal because more than just their own security is riding on it.

Comes down to personality.

Edit to add: if I had to pick one based only on the data provided here, "because I need the money" loses to the guy who offers that he can be flexible to the job's needs. First guy's statement hints at a personality where the job serves him. Second guy's comment hints at a personality where he serves the job. The latter guy would more likely be a better team player. Their personal life is otherwise irrelevant.

In reality the discussion where we pick the final candidate would include these suspicions and we might do some follow up to see if we're right or not before making anyone an offer.

 

[sdw]

As someone who's done a fair bit of hiring, I can guarantee I would continue to dig to find a more substantive and relevant way to distinguish them.

There's a counter argument for any general rule of thumb. e.g. Single people can be more available for their jobs but married people may be motivated to be more loyal because more than just their own security is riding on it.

Comes down to personality.

Edit to add: if I had to pick one based only on the data provided here, "because I need the money" loses to the guy who offers that he can be flexible to the job's needs. First guy's statement hints at a personality where the job serves him. Second guy's comment hints at a personality where he serves the job. The latter guy would more likely be a better team player. Their personal life is otherwise irrelevant.

In reality the discussion where we pick the final candidate would include these suspicions and we might do some follow up to see if we're right or not before making anyone an offer.

I've employed both types in the poll.
Married guys are generally more disciplined and reliable. Don't think that they aren't "getting any" when away from home, but they stay inside their allowance.
Single Hedonists treat everything as if it can be walked away from. They are absolutely confident that they can get another job tomorrow. So, you get an undisciplined, unreliable person that borrows from their peers between paydays and has vision problems when the bill comes to the table. About the only type that is worse is the gambler that has never seen a bet that he can lose. They steal, from everyone.

 

[BaconNeggs]

I have done, and continue to interview many people.
Sadly there was no option 3 given, to hire neither and find a better candidate.
But when forced to choose from those two only.
I would choose the single guy.
The first guy is trying to hard and full of BS if he came for an interview and told you all of that. Second question I usually ask is 'Tell me about yourself' if that was his speel he is full of it and portraying himself as some sort of Saint.
Everyone has a skeleton in the proverbial closet.
Smart people shut up about it.
But they know it exists and don't over compensate by telling the person conducting an interview all about the wife and kids. How they go to church every Sunday.
About their kids sports and such.
As an interviewer we can't ask about religion and certain other things.
So it had to be volunteered information and not because we asked.

The single guy seems a little arrogant to be talking about his hobby like that.
And how it's great when the gal leaves.
But at least he is more honest, and not portraying himself as a saint.

Given a bit of time and once a little comfortable at the work place.
Guy 1 will very likely want to become the office morality cop.
He will be telling people who have been there years how to live there life, and cause internal conflicts. I have seen it time and time again.
Then he will be talking about religion at lunch to his coworkers who don't want to hear it.
And I will be firing him.
Then he will go to the labor relations board and file a complaint.
Causing me a pile of paper work to prove I had to dismiss him and did so rightfully.

It's less likely I will have to fire the other guy.
But should I have to dismiss him it will not be a big deal.
He will tell me that I am making a mistake as he is a great employee and how dumb I am for firing him.
Grab his personal belongings and be gone in 2 minutes.
No bitching and complaining.
Most of all no file started with labor relations, and not playing morality police with my other staff and myself.

 

[Caramel]

hmmm I don't know...maybe the first one is more reliable and can stick to a routine better? 2nd one seems like the bipolar type to have moody days (like me, so I wouldn't hire ME in a 9-5 job)

 

[sevenofnine]

like shit,

how can you tell a twenty something is reliable,
I am sixty plus and worked at my job for almost forty dam years. and married for 35 seen the same hooker for over a decade, every week or every second week
for over a dam decade,
that is what I call reliable and dependable,
not some twenty year old in diapers. doesn't know shit about shit,

it would come down to personality, so much of work these days is holding someones hand, babying them, coddling them like fuck have some balls be some one,
I would want some one I could trust to do the job. ask question when he was over his head but other then that, just do the fucking job, no bull shit no drama, just do the fucking job your paid to do.
Im leaning to the unmarried guy, but I would need a face to face to be more sure.

 

[Horn_dawg]

like shit,

how can you tell a twenty something is reliable,
I am sixty plus and worked at my job for almost forty dam years. and married for 35 seen the same hooker for over a decade, every week or every second week
for over a dam decade,
that is what I call reliable and dependable,
not some twenty year old in diapers. doesn't know shit about shit,

it would come down to personality, so much of work these days is holding someones hand, babying them, coddling them like fuck have some balls be some one,
I would want some one I could trust to do the job. ask question when he was over his head but other then that, just do the fucking job, no bull shit no drama, just do the fucking job your paid to do.
Im leaning to the unmarried guy, but I would need a face to face to be more sure.

So you have been working at the same job and married almost as long since your twenties. So weren't you reliable in your twenties?

I wouldn't hire either person. There is no reason they should volunteer that much personal information if I was doing the interview. First one is probably hiding something and second one is bragging about disposable sexual partners. Wouldn't want either one on my team.