I was just wondering why some pooners will see a girl and then not review her, or wait until she is the topic of discussion to do so. Why is that? What makes an encounter "review material"?
I've only seen two sps since posting my initial request for info on this board - and my reasons for not reviewing are the same as noted above by oldnwrinkled1.oldnwrinkled1 said:
To avoid a Shill attack, sounds like someone new should post a negative review first and then a good review huh?
I'm of the opposite view. If I have a really good experience then I will write a review. If the SP treated me well, the least I can do is to help her advertise. This is her job and a good review is my thanks to her. Sure I could wish that she were all mine, but I know that I'm just a client. If I can help her be successful in her chosen occupation, then a honest review can only help.adventurer said:It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that when a pooner finds a real good SP, he is probably not going to share his experience.
I thought the same way until one of my earlier experiences. I usually prefer to ask the lady if it is OK with her for me to post a review, and to my surprise (as I was VERY pleased with the SP) was asked not to. Still can't really figure out why, as she is not well known, and she couldn't really figure out why either - just said the thought of it made her uneasy, even though she knew it would be positive.This is her job and a good review is my thanks to her. Sure I could wish that she were all mine, but I know that I'm just a client. If I can help her be successful in her chosen occupation, then a honest review can only help.






