Are you a doctor?........I find it hard to belive that one self confessed professional can be banned for posting medical info while another isn't. It doesn't matter to me if either of you are right or wrong. I just want to see some consistant enforcement.........one way or the other.
What happened to to Periods
- Thread starter maxx50
- Start date
I used to do the skip period thing by starting a new pack without a break, for months at a time. I just stopped because I didnt have any information on if it was a good idea or not. I never had a problem, and I think I'll start doing that, again.
BigBlue said:
tedsweettangv said:
maxx50 said:What . is that a bout .. we can talk about .. sex .. cocks .. pussies... tits .. whores..and..C*** ( maybe not that one)... and we can't post about the most natural thing.. a women having a period.. If a person is reading this board .. and posting on here .. why would they object to that.. and not everything else posted here ... If that is the way it works .. This board and most ,if not all of its post could be wiped out . in one day... I guess if i don't keep my mouth shut .. some one could object to every post I ever made .. and i would be gone ... Never existed
Isn't there some criteria .. as to what to keep and what to delete?
Randy Whorewald said:
Jodie said:
imrokhaard said:
mick_eight said:
athaire said:
OK, so by my quick count, BigBlue, tedsweettangv, maxx50, Randy Whorewald, Jodie, imrokhaard, mick_eight, athaire, and Walk Softly are all about to get banned for daring to question the mods. Oh, I guess my name will probably be on that list too for pointing this out.Walk Softly said:
I'd love for Sheik et al to prove me wrong by not banning any of us, or editing any of our expressions of discontent with the direction the board is taking. Frankly, I don't see that happening, however. The only real question in my mind is whether any explanation will be given, or if there'll be nothing but silence on the matter.
I have to admit, I missed the entire thread in question. I'm a little curious about who jjinvan's "detracter" was. I have a suspicion about that, and if my suspicion is right, it would certainly explain why the thread vanished. I don't want to go into any more detail on that, though, because it would be pure speculation and hearsay.
Perb has been steadily going downhill for months, even before Sheik's sudden coup and series of purges. Almost all of the more interesting posters (banned and not) have already found a new home elsewhere, though, so I really don't give a shit anymore.
Easy big guy.....although some of what you say rings true I for one am not ready to hang my Perb hat up. The information here and the vast membership still make it a necessary source of info. We will all become accustomed to the Moderation eventually.........or move on. Time will tell one way or the other. No one wants another "Idiot" episode.......lol.
Sirid
You would think that if some of the more conservative posters are a little peeved.. that there may be just a hint of .. " well we don't do this that often .. but this is are take on the deletion..... now that is all we are going to say .. and if you continue to be asses about it .. you will all be banned.. for questioning our authority period"
That would be nice to hear.
You would think that if some of the more conservative posters are a little peeved.. that there may be just a hint of .. " well we don't do this that often .. but this is are take on the deletion..... now that is all we are going to say .. and if you continue to be asses about it .. you will all be banned.. for questioning our authority period"
That would be nice to hear.
Hi Isabelle,Indy Isabelle said:
I just wanted to say that personally, I don't always agree with everything you write but I do enjoy reading a lot of your posts and hope that you will reconsider and continue to contribute to the forums.
So would advice from a lawyer, automechanic, arborist, roofer, plumber, electrician, chimney sweep, etc. I think for someone to follow any kind of advice they get off the net and not check it out further would be sheer idiocy.OTBn said:
Quick note to OTBn...
I'm sorry, I missed your post somehow, I wasn't avoiding answering.
As this hasn't been something I've looked into in a couple of years since it isn't an option as the pill makes me sick, I don't recall the sources I saw at the time. But my Dr did go over many many things with me as there are some health issues in my family history, so I was careful to ask about consequences.
One book I can mention is called "the Alchemy of Love & Lust" it discusses the impact of hormones on our states of mind, and various drives AND of the impact it has on the body. The research was pretty clear that the protection against cardiovascular disease and osteoperosis, that estrogens provide, were far more statistically beneficial than the incredibly small, statistically questionable, possibility of it causing reproductive and breast cancers.
I'm sorry, I missed your post somehow, I wasn't avoiding answering.
As this hasn't been something I've looked into in a couple of years since it isn't an option as the pill makes me sick, I don't recall the sources I saw at the time. But my Dr did go over many many things with me as there are some health issues in my family history, so I was careful to ask about consequences.
One book I can mention is called "the Alchemy of Love & Lust" it discusses the impact of hormones on our states of mind, and various drives AND of the impact it has on the body. The research was pretty clear that the protection against cardiovascular disease and osteoperosis, that estrogens provide, were far more statistically beneficial than the incredibly small, statistically questionable, possibility of it causing reproductive and breast cancers.
Thank you very much. That's very sweet of you to say.Man Mountain said:
Like you, I find that very often the posters I enjoy reading the most are often the ones I don't always agree with. It's always interesting to read something from another point of view or maybe about something I've never thought of, hear about or know much about. I really hope that perb can manage to keep some of the brighter bulbs on here.... before it collectively dims.
Periods..'the curse', 'a bloody mess'..not surprising the male dominated culture has turned this complex (& not yet fully understood) hormonal process into a condition that needs to be cured. And now our corporate drug driven medical system wants to eradicate it for the sake of 'convenience'. Please! This is a normal healthy function of females, a monthly cleansing. Sure it's a nuisance but hey, that's just the yin/yang of the universe keeping everything in check, imo. And in this industry where you make p/t in a month what takes most people several months of slaving, not to mention the use we subject our pussies to, just give your hard-working honey pot (& head) a well earned rest for a few days.
That explains why you deleted jjinvan's posts and those that quoted them, but why did you delete the rest of the thread? It was an animated, but civilized discussion about whether or not a SP should work during her period, as well as a poll on the subject. IMO, you should just have deleted the offending posts and left everything else.Sheik said:
Great rant!! I agree completely, and I'm male. It's a totally natural process.Very Veronica said:
Not so great rant! Lots of SPs take Depo-Provera injections not only as a birth control backup (in case of condom failure), but also as a means of suppressing their periods so they don't have to take time off. If there is a driving force behind the alleged push to eradicate periods, it comes just as much from women as men, likely more.
so I read a couple of short reviews of that book - which is quite dated now having been written in 96. The author seems to have an interesting slant in attempting to correlate love/relationships based on hormonal influences. But strictly speaking the book hardly seems to be something to hold out as a scientific/medical fact reference item.Indy Isabelle said:
more to the point, are you sure that book isn't speaking of estrogen as it normally occurs, as it's normally produced, by a woman's body? It seems quite disingenuous to speak of that book in the context of this continuous hormonal discussion where estrogen levels are much higher over the long term.
In any case the point I attempted to make (through the posts now removed) and the previous website links I provided, was that there appear to be no existing long-term studies that can speak to the safety of the continuous hormonal option.
about says it all.Very Veronica said:
The other thread (now removed) had an interesting point about the history of 21/7 - that it was strictly based on a marketing decision with some underpinning religious influence... but ya, historically male dominated... although someone else in this discussion was really determined to highlight some type of feminist agenda at work - perhaps she could elaborate on that a bit more
