This is a bit of an interest for me... I love the films of Stanley Kubrik... "2001" is in my all-time top 10, and "Strangelove" and "Full Metal Jacket" are way up there too. I bring up "2001" in discussion all the time as an example of a kind of film that barely exists anymore... a film that you have to think about what the director is trying to say... and what it all means. While George Lucas may have ripped-off some of the spaceship shots and modelling, "Star Wars" (a fun film) is at the exact opposite end of the spectrum of story telling (i.e., the narrative is as simple and familiar as possible). Brilliant film, "2001" in my view.With the current events, I watched 'Eyes Wide Shut' again, with Tom Cruise.
You know, about how the elites have private sex parties, and the women who speak out end up dead. Totally creative works of fiction. Ignore that Kubrik died a few weeks after the movie was released, if you don't want to go down that rabbit hole.
What was very noticeable to me was just how wooden the acting was in this movie. Cruise and Kidman were married when this movie was made, but the acting in the relationship seems forced. Tom Cruise, who is generally a great actor, was not believeable at all in this role, along with Kidman. His entire acting seemed forced. It's weird to see this now.
Wow "andmac", another great analysis. 👍👍This is a bit of an interest for me... I love the films of Stanley Kubrik... "2001" is in my all-time top 10, and "Strangelove" and "Full Metal Jacket" are way up there too. I bring up "2001" in discussion all the time as an example of a kind of film that barely exists anymore... a film that you have to think about what the director is trying to say... and what it all means. While George Lucas may have ripped-off some of the spaceship shots and modelling, "Star Wars" (a fun film) is at the exact opposite end of the spectrum of story telling (i.e., the narrative is as simple and familiar as possible). Brilliant film, "2001" in my view.
Anyway, "Eyes Wide Shut," I am not saying that you missed the point... as I feel it is all very much open to interpretation... but don't you feel like.... the narrative plays out inside of Dr. Bill Harford's (Tom Cruise's) subconscious? The whole thing is like a dream...a bad dream... a crisis dream... or a nightmare. Those kinds of nightmares where... the thing you don't want to happen... inevitably happens... crisis scenarios appear out of nowhere.... again and again... the guy on the street is following you... the people at the party know you are an imposter and an intruder.... when you show up at the gate, they are watching you, they know you are coming before you get there.... your close friend knows way more than you thought, and is in on it.....the prostitute you just had unprotected sex with is HIV positive.... and now she is deceased... and on-and-on it goes... everything unfolds like a bad dream. A subconscious riddled with guilt.
And the setting.... it looks NOTHING like New York City. It is a "New York City" like someone from the Soviet Union might imagine in the 1980s (and Kubrik was always an absolute sticker for detail). And the "doctor" is nothing like a real doctor.... the relationship with the wife is not like a real relationship.... etc. Everything plays out like a dream... a kind of tortured subconscious.
I mean... this is a hooker review website... so I am not going to write a thesis or anything... but, I always found this movie fascinating, and kind of creepy, if you take it on this level. It is not supposed to look or feel real. It's like a dream.... a subconscious reconciling itself to its own guilt.
I know Marty Scorsese... Roger Ebert... many big names... really liked this film. It is interesting if you take it on this level.
My fave Cruise movie is Top Gun: Maverick. And it's no different from any of his other movies: When he is engaged in some action sequence, he's brilliant. When he's interacting with men, he's really good. When he has a scene with women, particularly something romantic, he does seem really awkward.With the current events, I watched 'Eyes Wide Shut' again, with Tom Cruise.
You know, about how the elites have private sex parties, and the women who speak out end up dead. Totally creative works of fiction. Ignore that Kubrik died a few weeks after the movie was released, if you don't want to go down that rabbit hole.
What was very noticeable to me was just how wooden the acting was in this movie. Cruise and Kidman were married when this movie was made, but the acting in the relationship seems forced. Tom Cruise, who is generally a great actor, was not believeable at all in this role, along with Kidman. His entire acting seemed forced. It's weird to see this now.
Thanks for the positive comment!Wow "andmac", another great analysis. 👍👍
Kubrick was the king.
My fave Cruise movie is Top Gun: Maverick. And it's no different from any of his other movies: When he is engaged in some action sequence, he's brilliant. When he's interacting with men, he's really good. When he has a scene with women, particularly something romantic, he does seem really awkward.
His relationship history with women seems really strange at times. Lots of hot women in his past, but he looks like the guy who just bought that new sports car he doesn't know how to drive. So a movie like Eyes Wide Shut which requires lots of interaction with people is likely going to make Tom look rather wooden at times. I don't think he really interacts with people very well (check out his talk show appearances as well. He often looks like he is 'acting' rather than just being himself).
End of my two cents!
Maybe he has wood in real life, but with respect to onscreen romance, dude is a tin man.
The guy's got wood apparently.
I actually like some of his movies. He has a 40 year resume of some very good movies. The Firm from 1993 A few good men. Those movies didn't suck. He seemed to carry his own in both of them.Maybe he has wood in real life, but with respect to onscreen romance, dude is a tin man.
Further up this thread I mentioned being a fan of Cruise movies and Maverick being one of my favourites (as just pure unadulterated action!). But his 'action' when it comes to women seems ... eh ... a bit stiff in the wrong places.I actually like some of his movies. He has a 40 year resume of some very good movies. The Firm from 1993 A few good men. Those movies didn't suck. He seemed to carry his own in both of them.
Tom Cruise's movies have grossed over $13.3 billion at the worldwide box office, cementing his status as one of the highest-grossing actors of all time as of early 2025. His top-performing film is Top Gun: Maverick (2022), which grossed over $1.4 billion, while the Mission: Impossible franchise alone has generated nearly $5 billion.
Tom Cruise Movies List
Reading the books now, Bosh as well. Both series follow the books pretty closely. Just really good entertaining ready, kinda like trashy detective novels with classy trashy if you know what I mean. Kind of how I like my women!!Just finished watching the 4th season of Lincoln Lawyer. Great Series so far and it's coming back for a fifth season.
SSL






