What are the differences between Caucasian and Asian girls in bed?

[phreak]

Phreak.... You say women are all.. oh wait just most of North American woman are all 50 shades obsessed sluts, promote treating all women like worthless whores who are only worth the hole between their legs and a idolize a man who thinks rape on private property should be legal then claim discrimination and wonder why women might not want to take the chance on a male roomate who could be of your kind ? Give your head a shake.

BC Babe, when Roosh refers to women as 'whores', it's not just about sex, it's also about 'status whoring' and 'attention whoring'. And if we include those, here in North America we may well hit almost 100% mark. 'Status whores'/'attention whores' are childish, bizarre and ridiculous, their behaviour with men is teenage-like, grotesque and cartoonish, and typically the only 'value' they can offer is 'the hole between their legs'. It's really hard to argue with Roosh on that.

When it comes to 'rape on private property should be legal' statement, I would suggest you to read the whole article rather than repeating utterly stupid things after not-so-smart journalists: http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-stop-rape

Being a good roommate has nothing to do with person's political or any other views: it's all about very limited day-to-day issues related to living in the same household. There are plenty of women who may be awful roommates (just like males): untidy, noisy, disrespectful, abusive, etc. Denying accommodation based solely on the gender of a potential roommate is one of the worst discrimination cases one can imagine as housing is obviously something of extreme importance and the basic necessity. It is absolutely illegal to do so, and the fact that major newspapers don't mind running such ads just shows how barbaric this country is.

 

[87112]

Been working part time at some Mariners games, white women are now underrated for beauty, Its like the in thing is Asian girls. I swear you don't need to go to Russia or Ukraine to see some hot white women in this region.

 

[felixthecat]

it's also about 'status whoring' and 'attention whoring'. And if we include those, here in North America we may well hit almost 100% mark. 'Status whores'/'attention whores' are childish, bizarre and ridiculous

So what do the attention whores do, other than repeat same point over ten times on a forum?

I imagine men here are well-off, statistically paid more than their female colleagues (unfairly), and don't care about roommate setups. For those who feel unlawfully discriminated, there are options other than whining: sue, our legal system is good; move to a "better" country; join Taliban.

Roosh is at least successful in his mission, which is to make money off woman-hating losers worldwide.

And yes I read his stupid article. Stupid, as he clearly didn't think through how his beloved sister would manage if she decides to live alone. Cannot let in a plumber, that's an invitation to rape. Cannot check on a sick neighbour, as her horny nephew can come in any moment. Cannot enter a private club alone, she'd be raped on the spot, drunk or not. Oh right, she's supposed to be with a chaperon everywhere, Taliban at its finest.

 

[phreak]

So what do the attention whores do, other than repeat same point over ten times on a forum?

I imagine men here are well-off, statistically paid more than their female colleagues (unfairly), and don't care about roommate setups. For those who feel unlawfully discriminated, there are options other than whining: sue, our legal system is good; move to a "better" country; join Taliban.

Roosh is at least successful in his mission, which is to make money off woman-hating losers worldwide.


And yes I read his stupid article. Stupid, as he clearly didn't think through how his beloved sister would manage if she decides to live alone. Cannot let in a plumber, that's an invitation to rape. Cannot check on a sick neighbour, as her horny nephew can come in any moment. Cannot enter a private club alone, she'd be raped on the spot, drunk or not. Oh right, she's supposed to be with a chaperon everywhere, Taliban at its finest.

I don't know what happens 'statistically', but I've never been employed at any workplace in Canada where female employees would be paid less than their male coworkers for performing the same duties. Nor have I ever witnessed or heard about a case like that in Canada. First of all it would be against the employment standards/human rights legislation, and it would be easily and quickly resolved in court/labour board ('our legal system is good', right?) It's just another example or unsophisticated feminist propaganda.

If I need to go to court to prove that denying accommodation or charging fees based on the fact that I am a male is illegal, there is no need to 'join Taliban' - it already exists right here, in Canada. Not literally, but the society should be barbaric on Taliban level to consider this kind of discrimination as routinely acceptable and the law enforcement/legal system should be so corrupt to fail to enforce basic human rights without lengthy and expensive court battle.

As regards Roosh's article, I'm not implying that you or me or anyone else should agree with his point of view - all I'm saying is that it has nothing to do with encouraging rape. The article is actually not about legalizing rape to encourage it, but to prevent it.

Roosh is successful in his mission not due to his popularity among 'woman-hating losers', but due to the high quality of his research. I don't think there was anyone before him who invested that much time, money and dedication in any research on that issue. His pick-up guides and pretty much any advice related to women are so comprehensive, detailed and well-thought-out - I would give him a Nobel prize for that! Nobody else before him researched and explained that subject as good as he did. His research is not for losers - losers will always go after '50 shades obsessed sluts'/status/attention whores. His research is for men who still have some dignity and self-respect, and who look for women with more values than just 'the hole between their legs'.

 

[ignatiusriley]

Yes, smart ass, I know very little compare to those who use half-knowledge. The Charter is a contract between the people and the government. It prevents the government from passing laws that remove Charter rights. At the same time the Charter requires the government to uphold those rights. Through the legislation those rights get passed on to us.

'...most provincial governments have human rights and labour codes, which govern important private relationships, such as between employees and private employers. As governmental laws, these codes must be consistent with the rights and freedoms provided for under the Charter.' (http://mapleleafweb.com/features/canadian-charter-rights-and-freedoms-introduction-charter-rights).

Obviously such a basic thing like preventing gender/race/etc. discrimination has become a part of legislation/human rights and labour codes in any province/territory many years ago. So, yes, the Charter applies to everybody, not just the government, though in indirect way. If you have any doubts, open a date line/club and start collecting fees from non-white persons only, and check how fast you'll be closed down and prosecuted. But if you charge males only, well, who cares - males are trash who don't deserve any rights or respect anyway. Welcome to Canada!

Your ignorance is astounding. The Charter is part of the constitution as I previously mentioned. Good to see you finally twigged on to my hint earlier about where you might find a weak argument for your twisted ideas of discrimination. Yes Phreak! It is provincial human rights legislation. But it is not part of the constitution. It is just provincial law. And btw, much of it predates the Charter.

In case you still don't understand. The Charter only governs relationships between individuals and government. Provincial human rights legislation, much of which predates the Charter, governs discrimination in employment, housing and services generally offered to the public.

Btw. You should realize that under provincial human rights legislation you can advertise a place for women only. The reason the exception exists is logical. Men like you and your hero Roosh.

 

[felixthecat]

I don't know what happens 'statistically'

That's where Statistics Canada comes handy. Their data on income/wealth shows clearly that men are a privileged group in Canada (especially white men). Whatever the reason is, I feel like screaming of discrimination while being privileged is rather weak.
And in my anecdotal observations, I saw women being paid less in a similar capacity as men. They didn't take a legal action. But they didn't whine about it either.

Edit for laughs, for those who know: I remembered one who whined, name's Nicole Green.

If I need to go to court to prove ...

But yes you do, that's how the system works. If your legal rights are violated, you
[] complain on an internet forum
[x] go to corresponding authorities

So far many discriminated groups won their rights legally. If nobody bothers to act on it, the issue doesn't seem to be important. Of all groups, you'd think men would have some activists that get off their asses and fight for their rights in court?

The article is actually not about legalizing rape to encourage it, but to prevent it.

If He said so it must be true. But I already listed just a few of million life situations where his suggestion would encourage rape.

His research is not for losers.

You said your opinion on that, I said mine, others said theirs. Yours is in dead minority by the way, and repeating it ad nauseam won't change that.

 

[yazoo]

I like the showers as well

 

[summerbreeze]

I haven't had the opportunity to compare , so I'm curious to know what are the biggest differences between being with a Caucasian and Asian girl in bed? They don't necessarily have to be SPs but also just people from your everyday life. Some have said Asian girls may be too small or tight due to their size but I think that is just a generalization. From my observations in college, it seems Caucasian girls have more dating experience with more people while fewer Asian girls party as hard.

I find most Asian women have softer skin....

 

[phreak]

Your ignorance is astounding. The Charter is part of the constitution as I previously mentioned. Good to see you finally twigged on to my hint earlier about where you might find a weak argument for your twisted ideas of discrimination. Yes Phreak! It is provincial human rights legislation. But it is not part of the constitution. It is just provincial law. And btw, much of it predates the Charter.

In case you still don't understand. The Charter only governs relationships between individuals and government. Provincial human rights legislation, much of which predates the Charter, governs discrimination in employment, housing and services generally offered to the public.

Btw. You should realize that under provincial human rights legislation you can advertise a place for women only. The reason the exception exists is logical. Men like you and your hero Roosh.

You may wish to stop patronizing me... 'It appears you know very little.'... 'Your ignorance is astounding.'... I'm not a doormat for your low self-esteem. I know what I know and what I'm willing to learn - I don't need your evaluation of my knowledge.

I couldn't care less about legal technicalities and which legislation/charter/federal or provincial law guarantees basic human rights and protection against race/gender discrimination. The bottom line is: in any civilized society there are laws which prevent any kind of race/gender discrimination (and not just by authorities), and they are strictly enforced.

Obviously you can advertise a place for women only simply because the existence of a place for women only does not necessarily constitute discrimination of men. There are washrooms/saunas/shelters for women only, and nobody questions that. Apartments/houses/night clubs/phone chat lines are not intended for one gender only. So openly advertising shared accommodation for females only is nothing else but hate speech. Shared accommodation is not sharing one bed. Roommates have their own private rooms and on many occasions even private bathrooms. So privacy is not a concern here. A person advertising 'female only' shared accommodation is pretty much publicly saying: 'I don't want to share my apartment with men because I hate/dislike them. I hate/dislike them in general, not specific individuals with specific faults, but all men in general just for who they are. I believe they will create problems for me just due to the fact that they are... males.' This kind of ad is a typical, classic hate speech with the direct intention to discriminate (deny accommodation).

A club/chat line owner charging only males is publicly sending a message: 'Men are inferior to women and by far don't have the same value. Men should be happy we allow them to use our facilities for a fee (considering what a useless trash they are), so they will be allowed to socialize with the privileged noble part of the society.' Classic hate speech again - men are discriminated as a social group just for who they are - males. That's their only fault - they are males. How barbaric is that?

I realize that someone who is a white supremacist, for example, can still select a roommate who is white no matter what, but no civilized society would allow him to openly advertise his hatred towards people of other ethnicities, and use mass media to do so. Why hate speech against men is OK than? Is gender discrimination any better or 'more legit' than racial one?

 

[PierreCoeur]

How is it that you guys turn every thread into a pissing match?

 

[phreak]

That's where Statistics Canada comes handy. Their data on income/wealth shows clearly that men are a privileged group in Canada (especially white men). Whatever the reason is, I feel like screaming of discrimination while being privileged is rather weak.
And in my anecdotal observations, I saw women being paid less in a similar capacity as men. They didn't take a legal action. But they didn't whine about it either.

Edit for laughs, for those who know: I remembered one who whined, name's Nicole Green.


But yes you do, that's how the system works. If your legal rights are violated, you
[] complain on an internet forum
[x] go to corresponding authorities

So far many discriminated groups won their rights legally. If nobody bothers to act on it, the issue doesn't seem to be important. Of all groups, you'd think men would have some activists that get off their asses and fight for their rights in court?


If He said so it must be true. But I already listed just a few of million life situations where his suggestion would encourage rape.


You said your opinion on that, I said mine, others said theirs. Yours is in dead minority by the way, and repeating it ad nauseam won't change that.

The fact that men have higher incomes than women on average statistically is not the evidence of discrimination. As you probably know, women, unlike men, can produce babies, and that's why some of them choose to take care of bringing up kids/being a housewife rather than pursuing a career. Lots of women prefer to work part time or not to work at all and live on their husband's income (I personally know a few of those). Many women choose status whoring instead of pursuing their own career, and strangely this is applicable to many who are well educated and don't have to rely on a man to achieve higher income. It's all that simple.

I believe 'women being paid less in a similar capacity as men' is a myth: companies have certain pay rate for each position, and obviously they won't adjust it depending of new hire's gender. And what would be the purpose of doing so anyway? What's the catch? Typically the goal of employers is to exploit their employees, and exploitation works with the same success whether it's a male or a female. Both genders in Canada are equally complacent - so there is no valid reason to prefer either...

As regards my legal rights, we are not talking here about some minor dispute, but about gross violation of human rights/hate crimes. If your vehicle is stolen, you expect law enforcement to find and prosecute a thief, not try to sue him hoping to get you property back. Brazen violations which involve public disregard of basic human rights must be prosecuted on the spot. Civilized society can't just allow the public hate speech, which effects 50% of the population, to go unnoticed.

 

[ignatiusriley]

You may wish to stop patronizing me... 'It appears you know very little.'... 'Your ignorance is astounding.'... I'm not a doormat for your low self-esteem. I know what I know and what I'm willing to learn - I don't need your evaluation of my knowledge.

I couldn't care less about legal technicalities and which legislation/charter/federal or provincial law guarantees basic human rights and protection against race/gender discrimination. The bottom line is: in any civilized society there are laws which prevent any kind of race/gender discrimination (and not just by authorities), and they are strictly enforced.

Interesting evaluation of your own earlier posts that declared your alleged discrimination to be unconstitutional and something that should be dealt with by law enforcement. At one point you were an expert on the law and now you don't care. Btw, if the laws you are speaking of were so "strictly enforced" your hero Roosh would never have been allowed to cross the border. I'm happy he was though. After all, free speech is actually protected by the Charter (lot of case law on the limits of that given hate speech prohibitions in the Criminal Code). I think it is best to let the ignorant bury themselves with their own arguments though.

 

[InnocentBoy]

Asian girls might have funky breathe from what they eat but white girls sometimes straight up smell like men in the BO department. I've never had that kind of smell from an asian girl.

 

[MichaelP]

I will agree with a lot of what have been said so far: it is really difficult to group human behaviour in such a large geographical areas under a single umbrella. Just when I believe I "understand" people from a certain region, I meet somebody who changes my mind. Nowadays, instead of trying to fit them into a stereotype, rather, I try to understand what they want and, from there, give it to them (with my own twist). More often than not, they are willing to reciprocate by doing things they would otherwise won't. Quid-pro-quo. The same way there are (insert your negative connotation here), there are sweet girls who are willing to share the experience.

InnocentBoy, the keyword for a Google search here would be ABCC11. This is the gene that controls the type of earwax you would produce; however, it has been found to correlate to type type of sweat gland in the armpits. The majority of Asians has a recessive version of this gene, while the opposite is true for non-Asians. Because of this (and the bacteria in your body munching on), is the reason why some Asians tend not to have a stronger BO compared to non-Asians. The more you know? Not sure about the breath, though.

Phreak, despite I disagree with your opinion and what Roosh V says, I will respect it. Let me ask this: What would your mother say about Roosh V if she read what he has written? Likewise, if you have a sister, wife or daughter, how would they feel? The one part I will argue against is your argument about the quality of his research. It hasn't been peer reviewed, rather, it has been mostly people blindly agreeing with him. I am sure a lot of people will call it confirmation bias.

 

[ignatiusriley]

Let me ask this: What would your mother say about Roosh V if she read what he has written? Likewise, if you have a sister, wife or daughter, how would they feel? The one part I will argue against is your argument about the quality of his research. It hasn't been peer reviewed, rather, it has been mostly people blindly agreeing with him. I am sure a lot of people will call it confirmation bias.

I'm being facetius, but it's becoming clear to me that Roosh's research has been peer reviewed, but only his peers would endorse it