Most bullshit negative reviews (and shill reviews) are easy to spot. They are nearly always very short, poorly written and completely lacking in detail.
If a newbie wants to report a negative experience with a lady who has been reviewed favourably many times, he needs to avoid coming across like a jealous competitor posing as a hobbyist, or as someone put up to it by a jealous competitor. For example, saying "Don't see so-and-so. I had an awful time with her. She's a ripoff", is bound to be viewed with suspicion and/or hostility by the more senior members if the lady has a history of good reviews.
What reviewers (newbies and more experienced reviewers too) need to do is provide sufficient detail to prove, first of all, that they actually saw the lady. They also need to state what happened, what didn't happen that they expected to happen, and what was wrong with the encounter, without attacking the lady personally. That takes a little time and work, and if the reviewer is pissed off, it would be wise for him to wait a day or two before posting his review. Sometimes, a cooling off period is required to put things in perspective.
Newbies who take the time to write a credible negative review aren't usually attacked by other reviewers. And, if a couple of the lady's friends (male or female) attack the newbie, so what? They then become the target of the other members. People need to grow thicker skins. A couple of years ago, I posted a lukewarm review of a prominent local SP. I was dumped on by her and a couple of her male fans, both on the public board and in PMs. I'm still here. The strange thing was that I received several PMs from guys who had similar experiences to mine, but they were afraid to post them. Afraid of what? Even some prominent Winnipeg reviewers who are far from newbies are afraid to post negative reviews. I don't understand it!
I have, on occasion, questioned some posts by newbies for the reasons listed above. IHBS, I presume the Cory2000/Jade situation prompted this thread. Even though Cory2000's experience was different from mine, I didn't attack him or question his credibility because he provided sufficient evidence in my view to substantiate that he saw her. He also didn't attack her personally. I might have worded things a little less harshly, but I still didn't see anything in his review that shouldn't have been said.
Newbies shouldn't be afraid to post legitimate negative reviews, but they should learn first how to do it right.